Evaluation of the Clinical Effects and Frequency of MEFV Gene Mutation in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND: The clinical and pathological features of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF) are similar. OBJECTIVE: Here, the frequency of Mediterranean Fever (MEFV) gene mutation and its effect on the outcome of IBD were evaluated. METHODS: DNA sequence analysis detected the variants on the MEFV gene in patients with IBD. The relationship between mutations and the need for steroids, immunomodulators, biologics, and surgery was assessed. RESULTS: We evaluated 100 patients with IBD (55 with ulcerative colitis (UC) and 45 with Crohn's disease (CD)) and 60 healthy individuals as controls. The frequency of MEFV gene mutation was 26.7% (n = 12) and 14.5% (n = 8) for UC and CD, respectively. No relationship was found between MEFV gene mutation and the need for steroids, immunomodulators, and biologics (p = 0.446; p = 0.708; p > 0.999, resp.); however, in UC, the need for surgery in those with mutation (p = 0.018) and E148Q mutation alone was significant (p = 0.037). CONCLUSION: The rate of MEFV gene mutations was high in patients with UC who required surgery. These patients have frequent and severe attacks, indicating that the mutations are related to disease severity. MEFV mutation as a modifier factor of IBD should be considered.

Comparison of Single Antigen Bead-Based, Cell-Based, and Solid Phase-Based Crossmatch Methods.

AIM: Antibody assessment during pretransplantation term is important to detect donor specific antibodies. These donor-specific antibodies are determined by various crossmatch methods (flow cytometric [FCXM], complement-dependent cytotoxic [CDCXM], and Luminex [LMXM]). Recently, single antigen bead (SAB) assays have been used for the assessment of hypersensitized patients. The aim of this study was to compare sensitivity and specificity of the 3 crossmatch methods in reference to the SAB method. METHOD: In this study, 69 hypersensitized patients with high class I and/or class II panel reactive antibodies were tested using the flow cytometric SAB method. Serum samples were cross-matched by 3 crossmatch methods with the cells of a volunteer healthy individual, and the results were evaluated according to HLA and cross-reactive epitope groups (CREGs). RESULTS: Sensitivity was found to be better with T FCXM (0.91) and class I LMXM (0.87). Specificity of peripheral blood lymphocyte CDCXM method (1.0) was found to be better than the other 2 methods (0.33 and 0.57, respectively). Sensitivity of class II LMXM (0.88) was found to be better than the others (0.42 for B CDCXM and 0.82 for B FCXM, respectively). The specificity of the B CDCXM, B FCXM, and class II LMXM was similar (0.44, 0.44, and 0.33, respectively). CREGs results were similar to HLA results. CONCLUSION: Although CDCXM has high specificity for the detection of anti-HLA antibodies, it has low sensitivity. To increase sensitivity, FCXM or LMXM methods may be used with the CDCXM test. These results will be beneficial for laboratories and clinicians during graft survival and patient health assessment.