Energy drinks may affect the ovarian reserve and serum anti-mullerian hormone levels in a rat model.

OBJECTIVE: Energy drinks have an impact on concentration levels, physical performance, speed of reaction, and focus, but these drinks cause many adverse effects and intoxication symptoms. The main goal of this study was to determine the effect of energy drink consumption on ovarian reserve and serum anti-mullerian hormone (AMH) levels. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Female Wistar albino rats (n=16) were included and randomized into two groups (n=8). Serum AMH levels were checked before and after energy drinks were given. Eight weeks later, the ovaries and uteruses of the rats were analyzed histopathologically. The number of follicles in the ovaries was counted. RESULTS: The total number of the preantral plus small antral follicles, which show the ovarian reserve, was decreased at the end of eight weeks in both the control group and the energy drink group. There was a statistical difference between them (p=0.021). Also, there was a statistically significant difference in the initial/final AMH (ng/mL) reduction levels between the control group and the energy drink group (p=0.002). AMH levels were decreased more in the energy drink group. CONCLUSION: The consumption of energy drinks can lead to a decrease in ovarian reserve and AMH values and may cause weight gain.

Comparison of the accuracy and reliability of the AmniSure, AMNIOQUICK, and AL-SENSE tests for early diagnosis of premature rupture of membranes.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy and reliability of the AmniSure, AMNIOQUICK, and AL-SENSE tests with conventional tests to diagnose suspected premature rupture of membranes (PROM). METHODS: A prospective cohort study of 60 pregnant women at 25-36 weeks of pregnancy with suspected PROM was conducted between January and April 2015. AmniSure (Qiagen Sciences LLC, Germantown, MD, USA), AMNIOQUICK (BIOSYNEX, Strasbourg, France), and AL-SENSE (Common Sense Ltd, Caesarea, Israel) tests were performed after conventional tests (ultrasonography, pooling, nitrazine, and fern tests) and women were followed-up for 7 days. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy, among others, were assessed and compared. RESULTS: For women with a confirmed diagnosis of PROM, the sensitivity and specificity of conventional tests were 93.7% and 100.0%, respectively; diagnostic accuracy was 98.3%. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy were all 100.0% for AmniSure. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy for AMNIOQUICK were 75.0%, 97.7%, and 91.6%, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy were 75.0%, 86.3%, 83.3%, respectively, for the AL-SENSE pad test. CONCLUSION: The AmniSure test was most sensitive and specific for diagnosing PROM compared with the other tests and is reliable and usable.

Are the skin scar characteristics and closure of the parietal peritoneum associated with pelvic adhesions?

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the abdominal scar characteristics and closure of the peritoneum were associated with pelvic adhesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who had undergone cesarean section between December 2015 and February 2016 were assessed prospectively in terms of age, gravida, body mass index, number of living children, number of cesarean sections, time passed since the last cesarean section, closure status of the peritoneum in the last cesarean section, presence of other diseases, smoking status, location of incision in the abdomen (medial, pfannenstiel) scar dimensions (length, width), scar status with respect to skin (hypertrophic, flat, depressive), scar color [color change/no color change (hyperpigmented/hypopigmented)], adhesion of bowel-omentum-uterus, omentum-anterior abdominal wall, uterus-anterior abdominal wall, uterus-bladder, bladder-anterior abdominal wall, fixed uterus, and uterus-omentum-anterior abdominal wall in abdominal exploration. RESULTS: One hundred five pregnant women who had undergone previous ceserean section surgery by the same physician, were at least in their 30th gestational week, had surgery notes about their previous operation, and had no chronic diseases were included in the study. Age, gravida, body mass index, number of children, number of cesarean sections, time passed since the previous cesarean section, closure/non-closure of peritoneum in the previous cesarean section, and smoking status had no effect on pelvic adhesions. Intraabdominal adhesion was not found to be associated with scar length [odds ratio (OR): 1.54, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1-2.2; p=0.02], depressive scar (OR: 9.3, 95% CI: 3.2-27.2; p<0.001), or hypopigmented scar [OR: 0.01, 95% CI: 0.003-0.11; p<0.001]. CONCLUSION: Adhesions following surgical operations are of great importance due to complications for the patient, complications in relaparotomy, and high costs. Depressive and hypopigmented abdominal scars may be associated with pelvic adhesions. We believe that closure or non-closure of the parietal peritoneum is not associated with pelvic adhesions.