Effect of coolant spray on rib fracture pain of geriatric blunt thoracic trauma patients: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of cryotherapy in elderly patients with rib fractures due to blunt thoracic trauma. METHODS: In this prospective randomized controlled study, geriatric patients were assigned to groups to receive either coolant spray (n=51) or placebo spray (n=50). The visual analog scale scores of all patients were recorded before starting spray application (V0), as well as at 10th (V1), 20th (V2), 30th (V3), 60th (V4), 120th (V5), and 360th (V6) minute. The mean decreases in the visual analog scale scores were calculated. RESULTS: The differences between V0 and V1, V0 and V2, V0 and V3, and V0 and V4 mean visual analog scale scores measured in the coolant spray group were found to be significantly higher (p<0.001). In V1, V2, V3, and V4 measurements, the incidence of "clinical effectiveness" in the coolant spray group was significantly higher than in the placebo group (p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Coolant spray therapy can be used as a component of multimodal therapy to provide adequate analgesia due to rib fractures in geriatric patients.

Effect of coolant spray on rib fracture pain of geriatric blunt thoracic trauma patients: a randomized controlled trial

SUMMARY OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of cryotherapy in elderly patients with rib fractures due to blunt thoracic trauma. METHODS: In this prospective randomized controlled study, geriatric patients were assigned to groups to receive either coolant spray (n=51) or placebo spray (n=50). The visual analog scale scores of all patients were recorded before starting spray application (V0), as well as at 10th (V1), 20th (V2), 30th (V3), 60th (V4), 120th (V5), and 360th (V6) minute. The mean decreases in the visual analog scale scores were calculated. RESULTS: The differences between V0 and V1, V0 and V2, V0 and V3, and V0 and V4 mean visual analog scale scores measured in the coolant spray group were found to be significantly higher (p<0.001). In V1, V2, V3, and V4 measurements, the incidence of "clinical effectiveness" in the coolant spray group was significantly higher than in the placebo group (p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Coolant spray therapy can be used as a component of multimodal therapy to provide adequate analgesia due to rib fractures in geriatric patients.

Intravenous ibuprofen versus sodium valproate in acute migraine attacks in the emergency department: A randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: Sodium valproate and ibuprofen are drugs with known efficacy in the treatment of headache associated with acute migraine attacks. In this study, our aim was to compare the efficacy of these two drugs in the treatment of acute migraine attacks when administered as a single intravenous (IV) dose in the emergency department. MATERIALS AND METHOD: This study was designed as a prospective, randomized controlled, double-blinded study and included patients aged 18 to 65 years who presented to the emergency department with acute headache and met the criteria of 'migraine without aura' according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders. The patients were randomized into two groups and given a single dose of 800 mg sodium valproate or 800 mg ibuprofen in 150 mL of normal saline by IV infusion over five minutes. Changes in pain levels were assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for pain over a two-hour period. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients (49 patients in the sodium valproate group and 50 in the ibuprofen group) completed the trial, and their data were included in the statistical analysis. The mean decrease in the post-treatment delta NRS values was statistically significantly higher in the sodium valproate group than in the ibuprofen group. The mean differences were 1.69 [confidence interval (CI): 1.02-2.37, p<0.001], the mean difference between N0 and N2 was 3.61 (CI: 2.96-4.26, p < 0.001), the mean difference between N0 and N3 was 4.11 (CI: 3.54-4.67, p < 0.001), and the mean difference between N0 and N4 was 3.92 (CI: 3.67-4.46, p < 0.001). The number of patients who achieved the primary endpoint of pain relief was significantly higher in the sodium valproate group than in the ibuprofen group (p < 0.001). According to the Kaplan-Meier analysis showing the rates of reaching the targeted endpoint, there was a significant difference in the efficacy of the two-treatment group (χ2 = 79.98, CI: 80.35-99.65; p = 0.000).

Intravenous lidocaine vs. NSAIDs for migraine attack in the ED: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study.

PURPOSE: Although different forms of lidocaine are used for migraine attack headaches, the effect of intravenous lidocaine is still limited. This study aimed to investigate the effects of intravenous lidocaine infusion for the treatment of migraine attack headaches. METHODS: A hundred patients with migraine attacks, aged between 18 and 65, were randomly divided into two groups. The lidocaine group (n = 50) received a 1.5 mg/kg lidocaine bolus and a 1 mg/kg infusion (first 30 min), followed by a 0.5 mg/kg infusion for a further 30 min intravenously. The non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) group (n = 50) received 50 mg dexketoprofen trometamol and saline at the same volume as the lidocaine at the same time intervals intravenously. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores, additional analgesia requirement, side effects, and revisits to the emergency department were recorded. RESULTS: The VAS score was significantly lower in the lidocaine group than in the NSAID group for the first 20th and 30th minutes (p = 0.014 and p = 0.024, respectively). There was no difference between the VAS scores for the remaining evaluation times (p > 0.05). In terms of secondary outcomes, rescue medication requirement was not different between the two groups at both the 60th and 90th minutes (p > 0.05). However, the number of patients revisiting ED within 48-72 h was statistically less in the lidocaine group than in the NSAID group (1/50 vs. 8/50; p = 0.031). CONCLUSION: Intravenous lidocaine may be an alternative treatment method for patients with migraine attack headaches in the emergency department.

Intradermal mesotherapy versus intravenous dexketoprofen for the treatment of migraine headache without aura: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Migraine is a prevalent disabling primary headache disorder that is classified into two major types: migraine without aura and migraine with aura. New therapeutic methods to reduce migraine headaches in the emergency department (ED) include intradermal mesotherapy. OBJECTIVE: Compare the efficacy of intradermal mesotherapy versus a systemic therapy in pain control in patients with headache related to migraine without aura. DESIGN: Prospective parallel-group randomized controlled trial. SETTING: University hospital in Turkey. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients 18 years of age and older who were admitted to the ED over a 15-month period with headache related to migraine without aura were eligible for inclusion if they had a VAS score of 4 or above. Patients were randomly allocated to one session of mesotherapy or intravenous dexketoprofen. Changes in pain intensity were measured by the score on a visual analog scale (VAS) at 30, 60, and 120 minutes and 24 hours after treatment. Efficacy was also assessed by the need for use of an analgesic drug within 24 hours, by readmission with the same complaint to the ED within 72 hours, and by adverse effect rates. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Pain intensity on the VAS scale. SAMPLE SIZE: 148 patients (154 enrolled and treated; 1 patient in the mesotherapy and 5 patients in the systemic therapy group lost to follow up). RESULTS: Pain intensity on the VAS scale decreased from a median score of 8 to 4 in the mesotherapy group and from 8 to 5 in the systemic therapy group. These differences were statistically significant from baseline for all time intervals (P=.001 to 30 minutes, P=.004 to 60 minutes, P=.005 to 120 minutes, and P=.002 to 24 hours). The need to use analgesics and the rate of readmission to the ED were higher in the systemic therapy group (P=.013 and P=.030, respectively). Adverse effect rates were minimal and similar in the study groups during the one-week follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Mesotherapy is more efficacious than intravenous dexketoprofen in the management of acute attack of migraine without aura in the ED. LIMITATIONS: Unblinded. Valid for assessing short-term pain relief, but not sufficient to predict long-term efficacy. Not generalizable because single center and small sample size. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None. REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04519346).

Comparison of ibuprofen and piroxicam gel in the treatment of trauma pain: A randomized double-blind trial of geriatric population.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of topical ibuprofen and topical piroxicam for acute musculoskeletal injuries. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blinded study, geriatric patients were assigned to groups to receive either topical ibuprofen (n = 70) or topical piroxicam (n = 69). The first dose of gel was applied in the emergency department and the remaining doses were self-administered at home by the patients thrice daily for 72 h. For each patient, the initial baseline visual analog scale (VAS) score (V 0) was compared with the VAS scores at the 60 min (V1), 120 min (V2), 24 h (V3) and 72 h (V4) time points. The decreases in VAS scores, clinical effectiveness of the treatments, and incidence of adverse events were evaluated. RESULTS: In the topical ibuprofen group, the VAS scores were significantly lower at each measurement time point compared to baseline (p < .001). The results were as follows: V0 -V: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.56-1.61; V0 -V2: 1.09, 95% CI: 0.49-1.69; V0 -V3: 1.44, 95% CI: 0.81-2.07; V0 -V4: 1.59, 95% CI: 0.91-2.26. The mean percentage decrease in the VAS scores in the topical ibuprofen group was significantly higher than that in the topical piroxicam group (p < .001). The clinical effect of treatment was found to be significantly higher for the ibuprofen gel group (p < .001). There was no substantial difference in treatment-related adverse events between the groups (p > .05). CONCLUSION: Ibuprofen gel, which is a safe treatment option for geriatric patients, is more clinically effective than piroxicam gel. Response to Reviewers.

Comparison of topical capsaicin and topical piroxicam in the treatment of acute trauma-induced pain: A randomized double-blind trial.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of topical capsaicin and topical piroxicam in acute musculoskeletal injuries. METHODS: This is a prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blinded study. The data for the 67 patients in the piroxicam group and the 69 in the capsaicin group were examined. The initial visual analog scale (VAS) scores were compared with the 60th and 120th minute as well as the 24th and 72nd hour values. Differences between the VAS scores, clinical effectiveness of the treatment and side effects were evaluated. RESULTS: In the capsaicin group, the mean difference in the delta VAS scores was significantly higher at each measurement time. The mean of the percentage of reduction in the VAS scores of the topical capsaicin group was significantly higher than that in the topical piroxicam group. The highest difference in terms of both outcomes was determined at the 72nd hour VAS change. Mean differences were 1.53 (95% CI: 0.85-2.221) and 19.7 (95% CI: 12.4-27.2) respectively (p < 0.001). In the capsaicin group, the clinical effect of the treatment was found significantly higher (p < 0.01). The difference between the clinical effectiveness of the groups regarding the treatment outcomes was also statistically significant (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the patient groups regarding the presence of side effects. CONCLUSION: Topical capsaicin can be used as an alternative to topical piroxicam initially and at follow-up in patients presenting to the emergency department with acute pain as there were no observable differences in side-effects between the two groups.

Comparison of effectiveness coolant spray and placebo in patients with acute ankle trauma prospective randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Coolant spray application in musculoskeletal injuries is an effective and harmless method to treat pain and reduce functional limitation. This study assessed the clinical value of coolant spray application on patient comfort before and during the radiographic imaging process along with its early analgesic and anti-edema effects. METHODS: A total of 155 patients, admitted to the emergency department between April 1, 2019, and June 31, 2019, were included in this study. The patients were randomly assigned to either a coolant spray or a saline spray (placebo) group. To the coolant spray group patients, Cryos ®Spray (Phyto Performance, Italy) was applied. To the placebo group patients, a normal saline solution in a bottle covered with white opaque paper and refrigerated at 4 °C was sprayed. Radiographic images of the patients were scored for appropriateness of the standard imaging characteristics. RESULTS: The mean scores were 8.13 ± 1.8 and 6.58 ± 2.2 for the coolant spray and normal saline spray groups, respectively; the differences were statistically significant between the two groups (mean difference: -1.56, 95% CI:-2.20 to -0.92; p = .000). Patients with fractures on their radiographs and treated with coolant spray received higher scores than similar patients treated with normal saline spray (mean difference:-1.92, 95% CI:-3.28 to -0.55; p = .009). The proportion of patients requesting analgesic treatment before discharge was statistically lower in the coolant spray group compared to the normal saline group (p = .025). CONCLUSIONS: The radiographic images taken after coolant spray intervention in patients with acute ankle trauma were more successful in showing the target structures.

Comparison of two scores of short term serious outcome in COPD patients.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) related visits to the emergency department have increased substantially during the past decade. An important challenge facing emergency physicians when treating COPD patients is deciding on disposition. The aim of this study was to evaluate Integrated Pulmonary Index scoring to guide the disposition decisions of emergency physicians by comparing its compatibility with Ottawa COPD Risk Score. METHODS: This is a prospective methodological study, in which we compared the accuracies of the Integrated Pulmonary Index and Ottawa COPD Risk Score in predicting of the short-term serious outcomes in patients admitted to the emergency department with COPD exacerbation. Patients who admitted to our emergency department between 01.01.2019-31.03.2019 were evaluated. THE RESULTS: Among the 208 patients, there were 154 (74.0%) short-term serious outcomes. The AUCs were 0.915 and 0.943 for Integrated Pulmonary Index and Ottawa COPD Risk Score, respectively. The difference between AUCs for two scores was not statistically significant. The best cut-off point for Integrated Pulmonary Index and Ottawa COPD Risk Score were ≤3 and >4, respectively. For these best cut-off points, the sensitivity and specificity of Integrated Pulmonary Index were 92.9 and 87.1, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of Ottawa COPD Risk Score were 99.3 and 85.2, respectively. Besides, the accuracy of Integrated Pulmonary Index was 91.3, and the accuracy of Ottawa COPD Risk Score was 95.7. CONCLUSIONS: Integrated Pulmonary Index was a potential candidate for evaluating respiratory status and prediction of short-term severe events in patients with acute COPD exacerbation in emergency departments.

Comparison of intravenous NSAIDs and trigger point injection for low back pain in ED: A prospective randomized study.

INTRODUCTION: Low back pain (LBP) is a common complaint originating from muscles Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is mainly associated with trigger points (TrP) in the muscle tissue. We compared the intravenously administered non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) and trigger point injection (TPI) in the treatment of LBP patients admitted to the emergency department due to pain caused by TrPs. MATERIAL AND METHOD: After randomization, NSAID was administered intravenously in group 1 and TPIs were performed as specified by Travell and Simons in group 2. The TrPs were identified with the anamnesis and physical examination Demographic characteristics and vital signs of the patients were recorded. Pain scores were measured with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at admission; and in minutes 5, 10, 15, 30, and 60. RESULTS: There were 32 patients in group 1 and 22 patients in group 2. The demographics, vital signs, and pain scores at admission were not statistically significantly different between the groups. The pain scores decreased significantly in the TPI group. During the 60 min' follow-up period, the mean VAS pain score decreased by 0.41 ±â€¯1.30 in the TPI group and by 2.59 ±â€¯2.37 in the NSAID group (p < 0.001). Respond the treatment was significantly higher group TPI than Group NSAID (21/22 vs 20/32 respectively, p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: In this small randomized study with several methodological limitations, TPI was superior to the intravenous NSAIDs in the treatment of acute LBP due to TrPs. TPI can be used in the emergency departments for the acute treatment of LBP in selected patients.

Elbow Posterolateral Dislocation Accompanying Flexor Group Origo Rupture without Fracture - A Case Report.

INTRODUCTION: We wished to present a case that had elbow posterolateral dislocation accompanying complete medial collateral ligament rupture(MCLR) and complete flexor group origo rupture (FGOR) without fracture. CASE REPORT: A30-year-old man came to emergency department after falling on the outstretched palm. After first physical examination and radiologic searches, elbow joint posterolateral dislocation was diagnosed. Together with sedoanalgesia, elbow dislocation was reduced, and instability evaluation by applying varus and valgus stress tests was performed. Positive valgus stress test and palpation sign which indicated soft tissue damage on the medial side of elbow were determined. Control roentgenograms showed no osseous pathology. By magnetic resonance imaging, elbow dislocation diagnosis accompanying MCLR and FGOR without fracture was confirmed. Using medial approach, ruptured MCL and elbow FGO repairing procedures were performed. CONCLUSION: The complications of elbow dislocation without fracture, which is barely seen, should be treated through appropriate treatment strategies after meticulous physical examination and radiologic evaluation. Hence, possible sequelae could be prevented or satisfactory results could be obtained.

Can we predict agitation in patients with suicide attempts in the emergency department?

BACKGROUND: The agitation in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) after suicide attempts is common and an important problem. OBJECTIVE: To establish whether we can predict agitated patients among suicide attempt patients in ED. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional observational study of adult suicide attempt events in ED. Information was collected prospectively on a specially designed data-collection form. Patients aged 16 years old and above who presented to the ED for care due to suicide attempts were included in the study. Suicide attempts were grouped as aggressive and non-aggressive attempts. RESULTS: A total of 533 patients were included. Forty-three of these patients had agitation in ED (8%). Non-aggressive suicide attempts were referred to psychiatry services more than aggressive ones (73.6%, n=345 vs 32.8%, n=21, P<0.0001). Agitation in ED and being male increased aggressive suicide attempt risk 3.5 (95% CI:1.6-7.6) and 3.2 times (95% CI:1.8-5.5), respectively. Agitation was statistically more frequent among these patients: those on antidepressant overdose, with previous suicide attempt; with aggressive suicide attempt; and those with confusion; and unconsciousness (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Patients who attempted suicide and whose risk of harm to others included those with: antidepressant overdose, aggressive suicide attempt and the unconscious. Response teams should be prepared for these subgroups.