Use of systematic reviews of randomised trials by Australian neonatologists and obstetricians.

OBJECTIVE: To determine what proportion of Australian neonatologists and obstetricians report using systematic reviews of randomised trials. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey using structured telephone interviews. SETTING: Australian clinical practice in 1995. PARTICIPANTS: 103 of the 104 neonatologists in Australia (defined as clinicians holding a position in a neonatal intensive care unit); a random sample of 145 members of the Royal Australian College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists currently practising in Australia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Information sources used in clinical practice; reported awareness of, access to and use of systematic reviews, and consequent practice changes. RESULTS: Response rates were 95% (neonatologists) and 87% (obstetricians); 71 neonatologists (72%) and 55 obstetricians (44%) reported using systematic reviews, primarily for individual patient care. Databases of systematic reviews were used with a median frequency of once per month. Among neonatologists, systematic reviews were used more commonly by those who were familiar with computers, attended professional meetings, and had authored research papers. Among obstetricians, they were used more commonly by those who were familiar with computers, had less than 10 years' clinical experience, attended more deliveries, and were full-time staff specialists in public hospitals. Of neonatologists who reported using systematic reviews, 58% attributed some practice change to this use. For obstetricians, the corresponding figure was 80%. CONCLUSIONS: There is evidence that Australian neonatologists and obstetricians use systematic reviews and modify their practice accordingly. Dissemination efforts can benefit from knowledge of factors that predict use of systematic reviews.

Antenatal HIV antibody testing in Australia.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of voluntary antenatal testing in HIV surveillance and prevention by examining antenatal HIV antibody testing practice and policy in Australia. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study using a self-administered questionnaire. SUBJECTS AND SETTING: Specialist obstetricians and gynaecologists and general practitioners (GPs) affiliated with the Royal Australian College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists and Australian public hospital antenatal clinics, August-November 1992. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The percentage of public hospital antenatal clinics and specialist and GP obstetricians in Australia who tested pregnant women for HIV antibody as part of their antenatal care, and the proportion of pregnant women in Australia who had an antenatal HIV antibody test in the 1991-92 financial year. RESULTS: Questionnaires concerning antenatal HIV antibody testing were completed by 90% (993/1108) of specialists, 87% (2134/2461) of GPs and 93% (215/230) of public hospitals surveyed. Of the 706 specialists and 1503 GPs who reported that they were currently engaged in obstetric care, approximately 60% (430/706) and 935/1503, respectively) offered antenatal HIV testing either to all pregnant women or to selected groups at risk. There were significant differences in testing patterns between States and Territories. For the 95 public hospitals with antenatal clinics, 81% (77) offered the HIV antibody test to all or selected groups of pregnant women; these percentages did not differ significantly between States and Territories. It was estimated that 25% of pregnant women seen by specialists, 29% seen by GPs and 9% seen in public hospital clinics were tested for HIV antibody as part of their antenatal care in 1991-92. CONCLUSIONS: In Australia approximately one in five pregnant women were tested for HIV antibody as part of their antenatal care in 1991-92. Voluntary HIV testing in pregnancy may provide unrepresentative data for measuring the prevalence of HIV infection in pregnant women.

Reproductive health: knowledge, attitudes and needs of adolescents.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the knowledge and attitudes of adolescents with respect to reproductive health, with particular emphasis on their knowledge of the symptoms and transmission of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), preventive strategies and sources of information. DESIGN: Questionnaire survey of a stratified random sample of Year 10 students followed by group interviews with volunteers from the sample. SETTING: The study was carried out in 33 Victorian secondary schools. PARTICIPANTS: The questionnaire was administered to a stratified random sample of 1351 Year 10 students. Group interviews were conducted with 533 volunteers from the sample. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Considerable gaps were identified in knowledge of STDs and their short-term and long-term effects on reproductive health. An STD Knowledge Score was constructed based on responses to 46 items. The mean score for the full sample was 22.7 (49.3% correct) with a standard deviation of 6.4. As a group, country students scored better than city students (mean, 23.8 v. 22.2, t = 3.97, P less than 0.001) and females better than males (mean, 23.5 v. 21.9, t = 4.21, P less than 0.001). Medical practitioners were rarely identified as a source of preventive advice. CONCLUSION: The deficiencies identified in knowledge about reproductive health suggest that young people need better access to health information. Schools and the medical profession need to work together both to provide information and to help young people develop the confidence to use available information sources.