Conservative Management of Non-Infected Diabetic Foot Ulcers Achieves Reliable Wound Healing and Limb Salvage in the Setting of Mild-Moderate Ischemia.

BACKGROUND: The Society for Vascular Surgery Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) classification system has been validated to predict wound healing among patients with critical limb threatening ischemia (CLTI). Our goal was to analyze the use of a previously reported conservative wound care approach to non-infected (foot infection score of zero), diabetic foot ulcers with mild-moderate peripheral arterial disease enrolled in a conservative tier of a multidisciplinary limb preservation program. METHODS: Veterans with CLTI and tissue loss were prospectively enrolled into our Prevention of Amputation in Veterans Everywhere (PAVE) program. All patients with wounds were stratified to a conservative approach based on perfusion evaluation and a validated pathway of care. Retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database was performed to evaluate all conservatively managed patients presenting without foot infection for the primary outcome of wound healing as well as secondary outcomes of time to wound healing, delayed revascularization, wound recurrence, and limb loss. RESULTS: Between January 2006 and December 2019, 1113 patients were prospectively enrolled into the PAVE program. A total of 241 limbs with 281 wounds (217 patients) were stratified to the conservative approach. Of these, 122 limbs (89 patients) met criteria of having diabetic foot wounds without infection at the time of enrollment and are analyzed in this report. Of the 122 limbs, 97 (79.5%) healed their index wound with a mean time to healing of 4.6 months (0.5-20 months). Wound recurrence ensued in 44 (45.4%) limbs, 93.2% of which healed again after recurrence. There were three (3.1%) limbs requiring major amputation in this group (one due to uncontrolled infection and two due to ischemic tissue loss). Of the 25 (20.5%) limbs that did not heal initially, four (16%) required amputation due to progressive symptoms of CLTI. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with diabetes and lower extremity wounds without infection in the setting of mild to moderate peripheral arterial disease, there appears to be an acceptable rate of index wound healing, and appropriate rate of recurrent wound healing with a low risk of limb loss. While wound recurrence is frequent, this can be successfully treated without the need for revascularization.

5-Item Modified Frailty Index Predicts Outcomes After Below-Knee Amputation in the Vascular Quality Initiative Amputation Registry.

Patient frailty indices are increasingly being utilized to anticipate post-operative complications. This study explores whether a 5-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5) is associated with outcomes following below-knee amputation (BKA). All BKAs in the vascular quality initiative (VQI) amputation registry from 2012-2017 were reviewed. Preoperative frailty status was determined with the mFI-5 which assigns one point each for history of diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or active pneumonia, congestive heart failure, hypertension, and nonindependent functional status. Outcomes included 30-day mortality, unplanned return to odds ratio (OR), post-op myocardial infarction (MI), post-op SSI, all-cause complication, revision to higher level amputation, disposition status, and prosthetic use. 2040 BKAs were performed. Logistic regression showed an increasing mFI-5 score that was associated with higher risk of combined complications (OR 1.22, confidence interval [CI] 1.07-1.38, P < .05), 30-day mortality (OR 1.60, CI 1.19-2.16, P < .05), post-op MI (OR 1.79, CI 1.30-2.45, P < .05), and failure of long-term prosthetic use (OR 1.17, CI 1.03-1.32, P < .05). In the VQI, every one-point increase in mFI-5 is associated with an increased risk of 22% for combined complications, 60% for 30-day mortality, nearly 80% for post-op MI, and 17% for failure of prosthetic use in BKA patients. The mFI-5 frailty index should be incorporated into preoperative planning and risk stratification.

A conservative approach to select patients with ischemic wounds is safe and effective in the setting of deferred revascularization.

OBJECTIVE: The Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection classification system has been validated to predict benefit from inmediate revascularization and major amputation risk among patients with peripheral arterial disease. Our primary goal was to evaluate wound healing, limb salvage, and survival among patients with ischemic wounds undergoing revascularization when intervention was deferred by a trial of conservative wound therapy. METHODS: All patients with peripheral arterial disease and tissue loss are prospectively enrolled into our Prevention of Amputation in Veterans Everywhere limb preservation program. Limbs are stratified into a validated pathway of care based on predetermined criteria (immediate revascularization, conservative treatment, primary amputation, and palliative care). Limbs allocated to the conservative strategy that failed to demonstrate adequate wound healing and were candidates, underwent deferred revascularization. Rates of wound healing, freedom from major amputation, and survival were compared between patients who underwent deferred revascularization with those who received immediate revascularization by univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Between January 2008 and December 2017, 855 limbs were prospectively enrolled into the Prevention of Amputation in Veterans Everywhere program. A total of 203 limbs underwent immediate revascularization. Of 236 limbs stratified to a conservative approach, 185 (78.4%) healed and 33 (14.0%) underwent deferred revascularization (mean, 2.7 ± 2.6 months). The mean long-term follow-up was 51.7 ± 37.0 months. Deferred compared with immediate revascularization demonstrated similar rates of wound healing (66.7% vs 57.6%; P = .33), freedom from major amputation (81.8% vs 74.9%; P = .39), and survival (54.5% vs 50.7%; P = .69). After adjustment for overall Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection stratification stages, deferred revascularization remained similar to immediate revascularization for wound healing (hazard ratio [HR], 1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7-3.2), freedom from major amputation (HR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.3-1.7) and survival (HR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.6-2.4). CONCLUSIONS: Limbs with mild to moderate ischemia that fail a trial of conservative wound therapy and undergo deferred revascularization achieve similar rates of wound healing, limb salvage, and survival compared with limbs undergoing immediate revascularization. A stratified approach to critical limb ischemia is safe and can avoid unnecessary procedures in selected patients.

Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus Class D Aortoiliac Lesions: A Comparison of Endovascular and Open Surgical Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical and safety outcomes between two groups of patients with Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus class D (TASC II D) aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD): those with higher-risk comorbidity who underwent endovascular reconstruction and those with lower-risk comorbidity who underwent surgical bypass. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Thirty-two consecutive patients with symptomatic TASC II D AOID who underwent surgical bypass or endovascular reconstruction from 2012 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Lesion characteristics, technical approach, survival, limb salvage, patency, and change in clinical symptoms were analyzed. RESULTS. Nineteen patients with higher comorbidity underwent endovascular reconstruction, whereas 13 patients with lower comorbidity underwent surgical bypass. Patients undergoing endovascular reconstruction had an older median age (67.0 vs 62.0 years; p = 0.007), higher rates of hypertension (94.7% vs 61.5%; p = 0.018) and coronary artery disease (26.3% vs 0%; p = 0.044), and advanced renal impairment (mean [± SD] chronic kidney disease stage, 1.4 ± 1.5 vs 0.7 ± 1.3; p = 0.005). There were no significant differences in Rutherford classification between the groups. During long-term follow-up of 2.76 years, endovascular reconstruction and surgical bypass showed equivalent rates of survival (89.5% vs 84.6%; p = 0.683), limb salvage (100.0% vs 92.3%; p = 0.219), and primary or primary-assisted patency (85% vs 85%; p = 0.98). Groups showed similar clinical improvements in walking distance, rest pain, and tissue loss at 30 days (95% vs 85%; p = 0.158) and at long-term follow-up (74% vs 62%; p = 0.599). CONCLUSION. For properly selected patients, the clinical outcomes of endovascular reconstruction versus surgical bypass for TASC II D AOID may be equivalent at 2.5 years after the procedure. The decreased operative risk associated with endovascular reconstruction suggests that it is the technique of choice for high-risk patients.

Early Surgical Referral for Penetrating Aortic Ulcer Leads to Improved Outcome and Overall Survival.

BACKGROUND: The natural history of penetrating aortic ulcer (PAU) has been variably described and clear guidelines are lacking. We reviewed our experience with PAUs in a tertiary referral center. METHODS: Imaging reports from January 2010 to December 2017 were retrospectively searched for the diagnosis of "penetrating aortic ulcer." Diagnosis was confirmed by review of imaging studies. Patient demographics, presenting symptoms, and anatomic characteristics were collected and analyzed for associations with need for surgical intervention, aortic complication, and overall survival. RESULTS: One hundred six patients with PAU were identified. Locations included 57 (53.8%) aortic arch, 24 (22.6%) descending thoracic, and 25 (23.5%) abdominal aorta. Dissection was present in 12 (11.4%) and acute rupture in 4 (3.8%) cases. At presentation, 57 (53.8%) patients were symptomatic. Forty-six (43.8%) patients were evaluated by cardiothoracic or vascular surgeons. Thirteen (12.3%) underwent surgical or endovascular repair and 10 (10.4%) had a change in medical management. Long-term follow-up (LTFU) was available in 30 patients for a mean of 36.5 ± 29.2 months. Twenty-one (70%, 21/30) demonstrated disease stability or resolution and 9 (30%, 9/30) worsened with 3 undergoing surgery. No PAU ruptured during follow-up. Patient demographics, presenting symptoms, and PAU morphology did not predict disease progression. Referral to a cardiovascular surgeon at initial presentation was associated with a 40% decreased likelihood of disease progression (P = 0.046) and a 60% survival advantage at LTFU (P = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: PAU disease progression occurs in 30% of patients at LTFU of 36.5 ± 29.2 months. All patients identified with PAU on diagnostic imaging should be referred for a surgical evaluation and follow-up, as referral to cardiovascular surgeon is associated with improved disease course.

Debranching of Supra-aortic Vessels via Femoral Artery Inflow for Late Ascending Aortic Rupture.

A 56-year-old man with a history of Marfan's syndrome, total arch replacement, descending thoracic endovascular aortic repair, and twice redo sternotomy for pseudoaneurysm repair, presented with a pulsatile chest mass secondary to a contained rupture of the ascending aorta. The patient underwent supra-aortic debranching via the superficial femoral artery and ascending thoracic stent-graft placement under continuous transesophageal echocardiography. Completion angiography demonstrated successful exclusion of the contained rupture. Postoperatively, the patient was neurologically intact, the pulsatile mass resolved, and the bypass grafts remained patent. Chronic respiratory failure and multidrug-resistant pneumonia led to late mortality. This case demonstrates that hybrid repair is effective in the emergent setting of ascending aortic rupture. Debranching of the ascending arch using the superficial femoral artery as inflow is feasible and provides adequate cerebral perfusion despite the length of the bypass. The use of transesophageal echocardiography during stent-graft deployment allows precise device placement in the high-risk area of the ascending aorta proximal to the innominate artery.