Efficacy and Safety of Microwave Ablation (MWA) for Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) in Difficult Anatomical Sites in Egyptian Patients with Liver Cirrhosis

Background and aim: Imaging guided microwave ablation (MWA) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has become a widely used method over recent years. Tumors close to the diaphragm, gastrointestinal tract, gallbladder, pancreas, hepatic hilum and major bile duct or vessels are generally considered relative contraindications for microwave ablation. This study was conducted to assess the effectiveness and safety of ultrasonography-guided MWA in treating patients with HCC in difficult anatomical sites in comparison to those in conventional sites. Patients and methods: Eighty-eight patients were included and divided into two groups: the study group of 44 with 46 lesions lying <5mm from the diaphragm, hepatic capsule, gall bladder (GB) or large vessel; and the control group of 44 patients with 50 lesions in non-risky sites. Each lesion was ablated using an ultrasound guided microwave probe using a detailed protocol. Results: Most of the patients were males, with a mean age of 57.8 years. In the study group, two patients had lesions adjacent to the GB, twelve were perivascular and 32 were subcapsular. The overall successful ablation rates were 84.8% and 92% in the study and control groups, respectively. Within the study group, ablation rates were 100%, 75% and 87.5% for lesions close to the GB, perivascular lesions and subcapsular lesions, respectively. One patient developed a subcutaneous abscess, with good outcome after proper treatment. Fever, pain and asymptomatic pleural effusion were reported after ablation without statistically significant difference between the groups or among subgroups. In conclusion: MWA for HCC in difficult anatomical sites is as effective and safe as for ordinary sites.

Evaluation of fluvastatin in combination with the standard of care therapy (PEG-IFN/Ribavirin) in Egyptian patients with hepatitis C virus.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Cholesterol biosynthesis suppresses the replication of HCV-1b replicons, thus influencing hepatitis C virus (HCV) natural history. This study aimed at comparing the efficacy and safety of fluvastatin (FLV) as an adjuvant therapy to the standard of care (SOC) therapy, i.e., pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin, for the treatment of HCV patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty HCV patients were enrolled and allocated to either group I, who received the triple therapy (fluvastatin + SOC), or group II, who received SOC; the duration for both treatments was 48 weeks. All patients were subjected to pretreatment liver biopsy and monthly biochemical tests (liver profile, CBC), and quantitative HCV-RNA test was performed at weeks 0, 4, 12, 48, and 72. RESULTS: All virological responses were higher in group I than in group II, with no statistical difference. Group I showed no manifestations of hepatotoxicity. CONCLUSION: Fluvastatin yielded a borderline, significantly higher complete early virological response than SOC; therefore, it is a safe adjuvant to the SOC therapy.