Comparison of Autologous Breast Reconstruction Complications by Type of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Regimen.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy before mastectomy helps reduce tumor burden and pathologic response in breast cancer. Limited evidence exists regarding how neoadjuvant chemotherapy impacts outcomes following microvascular breast reconstruction. This study examines the effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens and schedules on microvascular breast reconstruction complication rates and also assesses the effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on circulating immune cells related to wound healing. METHODS: Patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and microvascular breast reconstruction at Yale New Haven Hospital between 2013 and 2018 were identified. Demographic variables, oncologic history, chemotherapy regimens, and complication profiles were collected. Chemotherapy regimens were stratified by inclusion of anthracycline and order of taxane administration. Chi-square, Fisher's exact, and t tests were used for univariate analysis. Multivariate binary logistic regression was used to control for covariates. RESULTS: One hundred patients met inclusion criteria. On multivariate analysis, the administration of taxane first in an anthracycline-containing chemotherapy sequence was associated with increased complications (OR, 3.521; p = 0.012), particularly fat necrosis (OR, 2.481; p = 0.040). In the logistic regression model evaluating the effect of the taxane-first regimen on complication rates, the area under the curve was estimated to be 0.760 (p < 0.0001), particularly fat necrosis 0.635 (p < 0.05). The dosage of chemotherapy, number of days between neoadjuvant chemotherapy completion and surgery, and number of circulating immune cells did not significantly differ among patients who experienced complications. CONCLUSIONS: Taxane-first, anthracycline-containing neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens were associated with increased complications, particularly fat necrosis. The increased postreconstruction complication risk must be weighed against the benefits of taxane-first regimens in improving tumor outcome. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

A Comparison of BREAST-Q Scores between Prepectoral and Subpectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Subpectoral breast implant placement has in recent history predominated in breast reconstruction, but there has been more recent adoption of prepectoral implant reconstruction. There has been limited study to date of patient-reported outcomes comparing the two techniques. METHODS: Patients who underwent direct-to-implant breast reconstruction between 2013 and 2018 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Eligible patients were asked to complete BREAST-Q domains comparing quality of life and satisfaction. Descriptive, t test, chi-square test, and multivariate linear regression analyses were performed to compare BREAST-Q scores. Significance was defined as p ≤ 0.05. RESULTS: There were 64 patients (114 breasts) who underwent prepectoral reconstruction and 37 patients (68 breasts) who underwent subpectoral reconstruction. Among the 101 women (182 breasts), there were no significant differences between BREAST-Q scores and implant position for the Satisfaction with Breasts domain (adjusted p = 0.819), Psychosocial Well-being domain (adjusted p = 0.206), or Physical Well-being Chest domain (adjusted p = 0.110). The subpectoral implant cohort was associated with higher scores, 53 versus 47, for the Sexual Well-being module (adjusted p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing direct-to-implant breast reconstruction had comparable BREAST-Q satisfaction scores for most modules regardless of implant plane. The subpectoral implant cohort scored higher for sexual well-being.

A comparison of perioperative safety for breast augmentation in cis- vs. trans patients.

BACKGROUND: Gender-affirming surgery provides a psychosocial benefit to transgender women. However, increased medical complexity within the transgender population has limited access for some transgender women. This study compared patient population comorbidities and 30-day peri-operative safety following primary augmentation mammoplasty between cis- and transgender women. METHODS: Data were extracted from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database between 2007 and 2016. Transgender patients were identified using ICD-9 &10 codes for gender dysphoria. Categorical variables were compared using chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests while independent t-tests were used for continuous variables. Statistical significance was set at P<0.05. RESULTS: There were 4,234 breast augmentations identified in cisgender women and 137 in transgender women. Transgender women had a higher frequency of ASA-II and ASA-III patients (P<0.001), diabetes (P<0.001), hypertension (P=0.006), and active smoking status (P<0.001). Despite the higher comorbidity burden and routine use of hormonal therapy, there were no significant differences between populations in major or minor peri-operative complication rates. CONCLUSIONS: Top surgery improves quality of life in transgender women. Despite the more complex pre-operative risk profile in the transgender population, there is no difference in peri-operative safety profiles. Plastic surgeons treating this patient population should consider more liberal surgical indications for reconstructive top surgery compared with cosmetic breast augmentation.

Long-Term Neurocognitive Outcomes of Spring-Assisted Surgery versus Cranial Vault Remodeling for Sagittal Synostosis.

BACKGROUND: A long-term neurocognitive comparison of patients with sagittal synostosis who underwent spring-assisted surgery or cranial vault remodeling has not been performed. METHODS: Patients with sagittal synostosis who underwent spring-assisted surgery or cranial vault remodeling were recruited from Wake Forest School of Medicine and Yale School of Medicine, respectively. Cognitive tests administered included an abbreviated intelligence quotient, academic achievement, and visuomotor integration. An analysis of covariance model compared cohorts controlling for demographic variables. RESULTS: Thirty-nine spring-assisted surgery and 36 cranial vault remodeling patients were included in the study. No significant differences between cohorts were found with respect to age at surgery, sex, race, birth weight, family income, or parental education. The cranial vault cohort had significantly older parental age (p < 0.001), and mean age at testing for the spring cohort was significantly higher (p = 0.001). After adjusting for covariates, the cranial vault cohort had significantly higher verbal intelligence quotient (116.5 versus 104.3; p = 0.0024), performance intelligence quotient (109.2 versus 101.5; p = 0.041), and full-scale intelligence quotient (114.3 versus 103.2; p = 0.0032). When included patients were limited to intelligence quotients from 80 to 120, the cranial vault cohort maintained higher verbal (108.0 versus 100.4; p = 0.036), performance (104.5 versus 97.7; p = 0.016), and full-scale (107.6 versus 101.5; p = 0.038) intelligence quotients. The cranial vault cohort had higher visuomotor integration scores than the surgery group (111.1 versus 98.1; p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in academic achievement. CONCLUSIONS: Sagittal synostosis patients who underwent cranial vault remodeling had higher intelligence quotient and visuomotor integration scores. There were no differences in academic achievement. Both cohorts had intelligence quotient scores at or above the normal range. Further studies are warranted to identify factors that may contribute to cognitive outcome differences. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, II.

Spring-Assisted Strip Craniectomy Versus Cranial Vault Remodeling: Long-Term Psychological, Behavioral, and Executive Function Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists regarding the optimal surgical approach for non-syndromic sagittal synostosis. This study provides the first comparative analysis of the long-term behavioral, psychological, and executive function outcomes for patients who underwent either cranial vault remodeling (CVR) or spring-assisted strip craniectomy (SAS). METHODS: Thirty-six CVR patients and 39 SAS patients were evaluated. Parents and caregivers completed the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) and the Behavior Assessment System for Children, Second Edition (BASC-2) to evaluate behavioral, emotional, social, adaptive, and executive functioning skills. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the CVR and the SAS groups (P > 0.05) in any of the BRIEF areas of function. Furthermore, the BASC-2 battery illustrated no significant differences in all areas analyzed except one. Among the 2 groups, the CVR group was rated as having fewer social withdrawal symptoms on the BASC-2 (47.00 ±â€Š10.27) compared to the SAS cohort (54.64 ±â€Š10.96), F = 6.79, P = 0.012, Cohen d = 0.688. However, both means were still within the normal range. CONCLUSIONS: Children undergoing SAS and CVR procedures for isolated sagittal synostosis were not rated as having clinically significant behavioral, emotional, social, adaptive, or executive functioning problems on parental forms.

Worse overall health status negatively impacts satisfaction with breast reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: BREAST-Q is a validated measure of patient satisfaction and health-related quality of life following breast surgery. Limited evidence exists with regard to the influence of preoperative overall health status on BREAST-Q outcomes. The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification is representative of preoperative overall health and its impact on patient-reported outcomes can be assessed. METHODS: Patients who received breast reconstruction at Yale New Haven Hospital between 2013 and 2018 and completed the BREAST-Q were enrolled in the study. Associations between BREAST-Q scores within modules and between modules and ASA were analyzed. Pearson's correlation and Spearman's Rho were used to characterize correlations between patient factors and BREAST-Q scores. Significantly correlated factors were entered into a general linear model (GLM) to control for confounding variables and isolate the effect of ASA on BREAST-Q scores. RESULTS: A total of 1136 patients underwent breast reconstruction of whom 489 patients completed the BREAST-Q. Increasing ASA indicative of worsening overall health was associated with a decreased BREAST-Q score for all modules except Physical Well-being of the Abdomen (p<0.01 to p = 0.029). In a GLM controlling for relevant covariates, ASA remained a significant contributor for all modules except Physical Well-being of the Chest (p<0.01 to p = 0.021). BREAST-Q scores decreased by approximately twice as much from ASA 1 to 2 compared to ASA 2 to 3. CONCLUSION: ASA classification is an independent predictor of BREAST-Q patient-reported outcomes following breast reconstruction. Communicating the potential impact of overall health may help reduce the discrepancy in postoperative satisfaction across ASA classifications.

Comparison of Neurocognitive Outcomes in Postoperative Adolescents with Unilateral Coronal Synostosis.

Unilateral coronal nonsyndromic craniosynostosis is associated with asymmetric skull growth, which may influence cerebral long-term function. Twenty affected adolescents who underwent cranial vault remodeling at a mean age of 8.2 months (12 from the Yale Craniofacial Clinic and eight from the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia) all completed a double-blinded neurodevelopmental assessment at an average age of 12.1 years. The study cohort included 55 percent female and 50 percent right-sided craniosynostosis. Mean verbal intelligence quotient was highest at 117.3, and mean performance intelligence quotient was 106.4, for a mean full-scale intelligence quotient of 112.5. Patients performed above the national average on all academic achievements except for numerical operations, which was significantly lower than word reading (p = 0.022). Patients performed below average on all Beery-Buktenica visual motor tests; motor-coordination was poorer than both visual motor integration and visual perception (p = 0.027 and p = 0.005). Significant positive correlations existed between paternal education/visual perception (r = 0.450; p = 0.046) and household income/verbal intelligence quotient (r = 0.628; p = 0.004). Patients with right unilateral coronal nonsyndromic craniosynostosis had improved spelling compared with left-sided patients on multivariate regression (p = 0.033). Female patients had higher motor coordination (p = 0.024). Breast-fed patients had better performance intelligence quotient (p = 0.024), visual motor integration (p = 0.014), and visual perception (p = 0.031). Adolescents who underwent cranial vault remodeling at two institutions had above average intelligence quotient scores, but worse mathematical and visual motor achievement compared with control subjects. Left-side craniosynostosis patients performed worse in spelling than right-side patients. Breast-feeding was an independent predictor for improved performance intelligence quotient, visual motor achievement, and visual perception performance. Study findings are limited by the cohort size. A larger population study is required, which could validate or modify the study conclusions.

Outcomes of Endoscopic Versus Open Spring Assisted Surgery for Sagittal Craniosynostosis.

Spring-assisted surgery (SAS) has been shown to be an effective technique for correction of isolated sagittal craniosynostosis in patients less than 6 months of age. At their institution, the authors adopted a minimally invasive technique in 2010, using a shorter incision and an endoscope. A retrospective chart review of 101 patients with isolated, nonsyndromic, sagittal craniosynostosis, who underwent SAS, was performed in order to compare perioperative and clinical outcomes of the open (n = 51) and minimally-invasive (n = 50) approaches. Surgeries were performed by 2 neurosurgeons and 3 plastic surgeons, between 2005 and 2018. The pre and postoperative cephalic indices were not significantly different in both groups. Minimally-invasive spring placement required a longer operative time than the open approach, with the mean minimally-invasive operative time at 65 minutes, compared to 53 minutes (P < 0.0001). Spring removal operative time was not significantly different, with the minimally-invasive operative time at 31 minutes versus 29 minutes (P = 0.48). There were no significant differences in major or minor complications when comparing the open and minimally-invasive approaches. In conclusion, both the open and the minimally-invasive SAS techniques are effective for early correction of isolated sagittal craniosynostosis, although the minimally-invasive approach requires a longer operative time for spring placement.

Patients with psychiatric illness report worse patient-reported outcomes and receive lower rates of autologous breast reconstruction.

Psychiatric well-being impacts on general satisfaction and quality of life. This study explored how the presence of psychiatric diagnoses affects patient-reported outcomes in breast reconstruction and on selection of reconstructive modality. Patients who received breast reconstruction at a tertiary hospital between 2013 and 2018 and completed the BREAST-Q survey were included. BREAST-Q module scores were compared between patients who had a psychiatric diagnosis at presentation and the remaining cohort using t tests. General linear models (GLMs) were used to control for confounding factors. A chi-squared test was used to assess the effect on reconstructive modality, and binary logistic regression was used to control for confounding factors. Of the 471 patients included, 93 (19.7%) had at least one psychiatric diagnosis. Cohorts did not differ significantly by age, BMI, race, ASA classification, or insurance status. Patients with a psychiatric diagnosis experienced a decrease in BREAST-Q scores for the Psychosocial Wellbeing (B = 9.16, P = .001) and Sexual Wellbeing (B = 9.29, P = .025) modules. On binary logistic regression, patients with a psychiatric diagnosis were less likely to receive autologous reconstruction compared with implant reconstruction (OR = 0.489, P = .010). The presence of psychiatric diagnoses is an independent predictor of decreased BREAST-Q. Furthermore, there is a significant disparity in modality of reconstruction given to patients with psychiatric diagnoses. Further study is needed to evaluate interventions to improve satisfaction among at-risk populations and evaluate the reason for low autologous reconstruction in this population.

Long-Term Outcomes of Spring-Assisted Surgery for Sagittal Craniosynostosis.

BACKGROUND: Spring-assisted surgery is an accepted alternative to cranial vault remodeling for treatment of sagittal craniosynostosis. The long-term safety and efficacy profiles of spring-assisted surgery have not been established. METHODS: This study is a retrospective examination of all patients treated with spring-assisted surgery (n = 175) or cranial vault remodeling (n = 50) for sagittal craniosynostosis at the authors' institution from 2003 to 2017. Data collected included demographic and operative parameters, preoperative and postoperative Cephalic Indices, and complications. Whitaker grades were assigned blindly by a craniofacial surgeon not involved in patients' care. RESULTS: The mean age at surgery was significantly lower for the spring-assisted surgery group compared with the cranial vault remodeling group (4.6 months versus 22.2 months; p < 0.001). Even when combining spring placement with spring removal operations, total surgical time (71.1 minutes versus 173.5 minutes), blood loss (25.0 ml versus 111.2 ml), and hospital stays (41.5 hours versus 90.0 hours) were significantly lower for the spring-assisted surgery cohort versus the cranial vault remodeling group (p < 0.001 for all). There were no differences in infection, reoperation rate, or headaches between the groups. The percentage improvement in Cephalic Index was not significantly different at 1 (p = 0.13), 2 (p = 0.99), and 6 (p = 0.86) years postoperatively. At 12 years postoperatively, the spring-assisted surgery group had persistently improved Cephalic Index (75.7 preoperatively versus 70.7 preoperatively). Those undergoing spring-assisted surgery had significantly better Whitaker scores, indicating less need for revision surgery, compared with the cranial vault remodeling group (p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Compared with the authors' cranial vault remodeling technique, spring-assisted surgery requires less operating room time and is associated with less blood loss, but it has equivalent long-term Cephalic Indices and subjectively better shape outcomes. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Radiographic Severity of Metopic Craniosynostosis Correlates with Long-Term Neurocognitive Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Reports of neurodevelopmental delays in adolescents with metopic craniosynostosis have ranged from 15 to 61 percent. Previously, event-related potentials have correlated preoperative radiographic severity with language deficiencies in infancy. This study sought to characterize neurocognitive testing at cranial maturity and correlate outcomes to preoperative radiographic severity. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with metopic craniosynostosis who underwent surgical correction in infancy completed a neurodevelopmental battery evaluating age-normalized intelligence quotient, academic achievement, and visuomotor integration. Data were stratified by preoperative endocranial bifrontal angle (moderate, >124 degrees; severe, <124 degrees). Multiple variable regression was used to control measured intelligence and achievement for age at surgery, age at testing, parental education, and income. Significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Twenty patients completed neurodevelopmental testing. Mean intelligence quotient was 111.7 ± 13 and academic achievement was similar to national averages (word reading, 53.4 percent; reading comprehension, 53.4 percent; reading composite, 53.5 percent; spelling, 44 percent; and math, 52.9 percent). Radiographic measurements revealed 36 percent of patients with moderate phenotype and 64 percent with severe. Patients with severe phenotypes had lower intelligence quotient measures and scored more poorly in every academic measure tested. Word reading (113 versus 95; p = 0.035) and reading composite (109 versus 98; p = 0.014) reached significance. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, cranial mature patients with metopic craniosynostosis had above average intelligence quotient and academic achievement near the national mean. Long-term neurocognitive function was correlated to preoperative radiographic severity in metopic craniosynostosis, with more severe cases performing worse. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, II.

Impact of socioeconomic status on psychological functioning in survivorship following breast cancer and reconstruction.

Socioeconomic status (SES) remains an important population health risk factor and impacts a patient's experience of care during breast cancer. This study explored the relationship between SES and quality of life and satisfaction in survivorship following breast cancer and reconstruction. All patients underwent breast reconstruction at a single academic center from 2013 to 2017. Patients completed the five quality of life and satisfaction domains of the BREAST-Q, a validated patient-reported outcome measure. Estimated home value using a web-based real estate website was used to approximate a patient's socioeconomic status. Correlations were evaluated using Pearson's correlation methods, where appropriate, as well as analysis of covariance. Data were stratified for comparison utilizing t tests and linear regression models. Significance was defined as P ≤ .05. Four hundred patients underwent 711 breast reconstructions during the study time period. Satisfaction with the breast (P = .038) and psychosocial well-being (P = .012) had significant positive correlations with increasing socioeconomic status. When stratifying patients' socioeconomic status into thirds, the upper third had significantly higher psychosocial well-being (P = .001), satisfaction with breasts (P = .010), and physical well-being of the chest (P = .001) than the lower third. Significance persisted even after controlling for cancer stage, treatment, complications, and baseline comorbidities. Higher socioeconomic status is associated with greater satisfaction with breast reconstruction and psychosocial well-being following breast cancer treatment. Providing added social, psychological, and emotional support networks may be beneficial long after the initial cancer treatment and reconstruction are complete. Patients of lower socioeconomic status may benefit from additional resources.

Assessing Facial Asymmetry in Postoperative Patients With Unilateral Coronal Craniosynostosis.

BACKGROUND: Despite surgical correction of unilateral craniosynostosis (ULC), complex cranial base angulation can result in partial reversion to preoperative deformity with growth and time. Using 3-dimensional imaging, dysmorphic facial features of ULC in school-age patients were quantified and related to how they contribute to overall facial asymmetry and patient-reported outcomes. METHODS: Children who underwent surgical correction of ULC were recruited from Yale University and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. The 3D photographs were analyzed utilizing a Procrustes analysis of shape. Pearson's correlation was used to determine dysmorphic features' impact on overall asymmetry. Patients were stratified into "moderate" and "severe" asymmetry. Finally, asymmetry was correlated to patient-reported outcome scores. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS-25 with P < 0.05 as statistically significant. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were included with average age at analysis of 12.3 years. Fifty-seven percent of patients had right-sided fusion. The overall Procrustes analysis indicated a root mean square difference of 2.21 mm. Pearson's correlation indicated that the facial middle 3rd (P ≤ 0.001), orbital dystopia (P < 0.001), chin point deviation (P = 0.011), and nasal root angulation (P = 0.019) contributed most to overall asymmetry. Patients in the severe asymmetry cohort had greater facial middle-third asymmetry (P < 0.001) and orbital dystopia (P < 0.001). Asymmetry did not correlate with patient-reported outcomes. CONCLUSION: Patients with ULC have persistent facial asymmetry at school-age with the greatest levels of asymmetry in the facial middle-third, orbit, and nasal root. Beyond the cranial dysmorphology, initial skull base angulation in unilateral coronal craniosynostosis manifests in long-term mid and lower-third facial asymmetry.

Impact of Insurance Payer on Type of Breast Reconstruction Performed.

BACKGROUND: The impact of insurance and socioeconomic status on breast reconstruction modalities when access to care is controlled is unknown. METHODS: Records for patients who underwent breast reconstruction at an academic medical center between 2013 and 2017 were reviewed and analyzed using chi-square analysis and logistic regression. RESULTS: One thousand six hundred eighty-three breast reconstructions were analyzed. The commercially insured were more likely to undergo microvascular autologous breast reconstruction (44.4 percent versus 31.3 percent; p < 0.001), with an odds ratio of 2.22, whereas patients with Medicare and Medicaid were significantly more likely to receive tissue expander/implant breast reconstruction, with an odds ratio of 1.42 (41.7 percent versus 47.7 percent; p = 0.013). Comparing all patients with microvascular reconstruction, the commercially insured were more likely to receive a perforator flap (79.7 percent versus 55.3 percent versus 43.9 percent), with an odds ratio of 4.23 (p < 0.001). When stratifying patients by median household income, those in the highest income quartile were most likely to receive a perforator flap (82.1 percent) (p < 0.001), whereas those in the lowest income quartile were most likely to receive a muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap (36.4 percent) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients at the same academic medical center had significantly different breast reconstruction modalities when stratified by insurance and household income. Despite similar access to care, differences in insurance types may favor higher rates of perforator flap breast reconstruction among the commercially insured. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, II.

National Patterns in Surgical Management of Syndactyly: A Review of 956 Cases.

Purpose: Being one of the most common congenital hand malformations, syndactyly is repaired by orthopedic, plastic, and fellowship-trained general surgeons. Limited multi-institutional outcomes analyses regarding incidence, timing, and type of repair exist. Methods: All syndactyly cases performed over a 5-year period from 2012-2016 were isolated from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric database. Patient demographics, surgical factors, perioperative outcomes, and risk factors were analyzed using χ2, Fisher exact, and t-test analysis. Results: A total of 956 patients who underwent syndactyly repair were identified. Most cases were simple syndactyly with nearly even case distribution among plastic and orthopedic surgeons. Most patients were men and Caucasian. Mean age at the time of surgery was 2.6 years. Most cases were performed as outpatient surgery. Patients of plastic surgeons had significantly more airway abnormalities and shorter operative times. Patients with complex syndactyly had significantly more ventilator dependence, tracheostomy, and comorbidities when compared with those with simple syndactyly. Cases with complex syndactyly also had longer operative times and a higher rate of superficial surgical site infections. Conclusions: Syndactyly repair is a safe procedure with few major or minor reconstructive complications regardless of the surgical specialty or syndactyly type. Patients with complex syndactyly have significantly more preoperative comorbidities with comparable outcomes. orthopedic surgeons have significantly longer operative times than plastic surgeons, likely due to caring for increased number of patients with complex syndactyly.

Secondary Cleft Rhinoplasty in 1720 Patients: Are National Practices Consistent With Guidelines?

OBJECTIVE: To assess the timing, type, and associated adjunct procedures for secondary cleft rhinoplasty nationally. DESIGN: Data were extracted from a national database of all secondary cleft rhinoplasty procedures (Current Procedural Terminology [CPT] codes 30460 and 30462). Frequency statistics were utilized to analyze demographics, comorbidities, surgical procedures, and timing. Chi-squared analysis and Fisher exact test were used for analysis. SETTING: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric Database. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1720 patients met inclusion criteria for secondary cleft rhinoplasty repair. INTERVENTIONS: No relevant intervention. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Age, demographics, comorbidities, and associated procedures. RESULTS: Over 5 consecutive years, 1720 patients underwent secondary cleft lip rhinoplasty nationally. Mean patient age was 9.3 ± 5.3 years. Unilateral cleft rhinoplasty patients were older (9.0 years) than bilateral patients (7.8 years; P = .001). Rib grafting was performed in 6.3% of patients at a mean age of 10.6 years with a higher proportion of Asian and female patients. Auricular grafts were more commonly performed by otolaryngology than plastic surgery. The most common adjunct procedures included secondary cleft lip revision (33.1%) and tympanostomy tube placement (10.2%). When subdividing by type of cleft rhinoplasty, tip rhinoplasty was performed at a mean age of 7.3 years compared to rhinoplasty with osteotomies and a major septal component at 12.1 years (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals that a large proportion of cleft rhinoplasties are performed in skeletally immature patients. Although patients undergoing rib grafting, nasal osteotomies, and a major septal component were older, these procedures are still performed in a large proportion of patients who are younger than expected.

SMAD6 Genotype Predicts Neurodevelopment in Nonsyndromic Craniosynostosis.

BACKGROUND: De novo or rare transmitted mutations in the SMAD6 gene affect 7 percent of midline nonsyndromic synostosis patients. This study aimed to determine the neurocognitive sequelae of SMAD6 synostosis. METHODS: Nonsyndromic synostosis patients 6 years or older with SMAD6 mutations and non-SMAD6 nonsyndromic synostosis controls were recruited. All patients completed a double-blinded neurodevelopmental battery (i.e., Wechsler Fundamentals, Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence, Beery-Buktenica Developmental test), and parents/guardians completed behavioral surveys (Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function and Behavior Rating System for Children). RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients participated: 10 known SMAD6 patients (average age, 10 years; 1 female; eight metopic and two sagittal; nine treated with cranial vault remodeling and one treated with strip craniectomy) and 18 non-SMAD6 controls (age, 9.5 years; three female; 12 metopic and six sagittal; 17 treated with cranial vault remodeling and one treated with strip craniectomy). There were no differences between any demographics. Testing age, surgical age, parental education, and household income correlated with cognition (p < 0.05). After controlling for these factors, SMAD6 patients performed worse on numerical operations (p = 0.046), performance intelligence quotient (p = 0.018), full-scale intelligence quotient (p = 0.010), and motor coordination (p = 0.043) compared to age/race/gender/synostosis/operation-matched controls. On behavioral surveys, SMAD6 patients scored worse on 14 assessments, including aggression, communication, and behavior. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective double-blinded study revealed that neuropsychiatric development of nonsyndromic synostosis may be under genetic control. SMAD6 mutations led to poorer mathematics, performance intelligence quotient, full-scale intelligence quotient, and motor coordination, even after controlling for exogenous factors. Genetic testing may be critical for advocating early adjunctive neurodevelopmental therapy. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, II.

Veau III and Veau IV Cleft Palate: Do Peri-Operative Complications Differ?

OBJECTIVE: The Veau classification represents the most commonly used system for characterizing cleft palate severity. Conflicting evidence exists as to how increasing Veau classification affects outcomes. This study compared perioperative outcomes between Veau III and IV cleft palate repairs. METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric (NSQIP-P) database was used to identify cleft palate repairs between 2012 and 2016 using CPT codes. Patients with alveolar bone grafts were excluded. Veau III (unilateral) and Veau IV (bilateral) cleft palate repairs were identified using International Classification of Disease code 9 and 10 (ICD-9 and -10 codes. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and adverse events were compared between the cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 5026 patients underwent cleft palate repair between 2012 and 2016. Of the 2114 patients with identifiable Veau classification, 1302 had Veau III cleft palates and 812 had Veau IV cleft palates.The Veau IV cleft palate patient population was older (377.8 versus 354.1 days, P < 0.001) and had significantly more comorbidities including a higher incidence of chronic lung disease (P = 0.014), airway abnormalities (P = 0.001), developmental delay (P = 0.018), structural central nervous system deformities (P < 0.001), and nutritional support (P < 0.001). Veau IV cleft palate repairs also had longer operative times (153.2 versus 140.2 minutes, P < 0.001). Despite significant differences in comorbidities and perioperative factors, there were no differences in 30-day complications, readmissions, or reoperation rates between Veau III and IV cleft palate repairs. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing Veau IV cleft palate repair have a significantly greater number of comorbidities than Veau III cleft palate repairs. Despite differences in patient populations, 30-day surgical outcomes are comparable between the cohorts.

Complication Profiles by Mastectomy Indication in Tissue Expander Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Two-stage implant breast reconstruction is the most commonly performed breast reconstruction procedure. Limited data exist regarding reconstruction complication rates examined by mastectomy indication. METHODS: Patients who underwent two-stage implant breast reconstruction at Yale New Haven Hospital from 2011 to 2017 were included in the study. Perioperative complications were compared. Chi-square analysis, t tests, and Fisher's exact tests were used to determine significant associations. A binary logistic regression was used to determine variables with a significant impact on the likelihood of mastectomy flap necrosis. RESULTS: Between 2011 and 2017, complete perioperative records were available for 141 patients who underwent 226 mastectomies followed by two-stage tissue expander/permanent implant reconstruction. Of the 226 mastectomies, 134 were therapeutic and 92 were prophylactic. On regression analysis, there were no significant differences in demographics, comorbidities, or mastectomy and reconstructive details between the two breast groups except for there being more modified radical mastectomies in therapeutic breasts (p = 0.003). When comparing complications, there was a significantly higher risk of mastectomy flap necrosis in the therapeutic group (p = 0.017). Therapeutic mastectomies had a 9.5 times higher risk of mastectomy flap necrosis than prophylactic mastectomies when adjusted for confounding variables. There were no significant differences in other reconstructive complications between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing therapeutic mastectomies have a significantly higher risk of mastectomy flap necrosis than those undergoing prophylactic mastectomies. Although the underlying cause still needs to be determined, differences in technique may be related to mastectomy flap necrosis. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, II.

Chronic steroid use as an independent risk factor for perioperative complications.

BACKGROUND: Corticosteroid use continues to rise nationally. Studies have evaluated the impact of chronic steroid use on surgical outcomes in smaller populations. This study investigated the impact of chronic steroid use on perioperative surgical outcomes in a surgical cohort of more than 5 million surgical patients, using a statistically rigorous methodology. METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database was queried 2008-2016 to evaluate chronic steroid use. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and outcomes were compared, using χ2 and t test analysis, and then repeated after propensity score matching. Finally, a double-adjustment logistic regression was utilized, yielding odds ratios to assess the effect of chronic steroids on perioperative outcomes within the matched population. RESULTS: Between 2008 and 2016, a total of 5,244,588 patients met inclusion criteria, of whom 181,901 (3.5%) were taking steroids for a minimum of 30 days before surgery. Patients on chronic steroids had significantly more comorbidities compared with the remaining population. After propensity score matching and double-adjusted logistic regression, chronic steroid use was found to be associated with increased surgical complications and poorer surgical outcomes. Chronic steroid use significantly increased a patient's risk of having a hospital stay longer than 30 days by 19%, risk of readmission within 30 days by 58%, risk of reoperation by 21%, and risk of death by 32%. CONCLUSION: After controlling for differences in comorbidities and demographics, patients on chronic steroids have significantly poorer perioperative outcomes. Chronic steroid use should be evaluated and, if possible, addressed before surgery, given their significant impact on surgical outcomes.