Long-term outcomes in patients with polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis receiving adalimumab with or without methotrexate.

OBJECTIVES: Long-term safety and efficacy of adalimumab among patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) was evaluated through 6 years of treatment. METHODS: Children aged 4-17 years with polyarticular JIA were enrolled in a phase III, randomised-withdrawal, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial consisting of a 16-week open-label lead-in period, 32-week randomised double-blind period and 360-week long-term extension. Patients were stratified by baseline methotrexate use. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored, and efficacy assessments included JIA American College of Rheumatology (JIA ACR) 30%, 50%, 70% or 90% responses and the proportions of patients achieving 27-joint Juvenile Arthritis Disease Activity Score (JADAS27) low disease activity (LDA, ≤3.8) and inactive disease (ID, ≤1). RESULTS: Of 171 patients enrolled, 62 (36%) completed the long-term extension. Twelve serious infections in 11 patients were reported through 592.8 patient-years of exposure. No cases of congestive heart failure-related AEs, demyelinating disease, lupus-like syndrome, malignancies, tuberculosis or deaths were reported. JIA ACR 30/50/70/90 responses and JADAS27 LDA were achieved in 66% to 96% of patients at week 104, and 63 (37%) patients achieved clinical remission (JADAS27 ID sustained for ≥6 continuous months) during the study. Attainment of JIA ACR 50 or higher and JADAS27 LDA or ID in the initial weeks were the best predictors of clinical remission. Mean JADAS27 decreased from baseline, 22.5 (n=170), to 2.5 (n=30) at week 312 (observed analysis). CONCLUSIONS: Through 6 years of exposure, adalimumab was well tolerated with significant clinical response (up to clinical remission) and a relatively low retention rate.

Juvenile dermatomyositis resembling late-stage Degos disease with gastrointestinal perforations successfully treated with combination of cyclophosphamide and rituximab: case-based review.

Dermatomyositis (DM) is a multi-system disease that results in chronic inflammation principally of the skin and striated muscle. Small blood vessel injury in the GI tract has been described in dermatomyositis, manifesting as bleeding, ulceration, pneumatosis intestinalis, and ultimately perforation. Recent histopathological studies have shown deposits in the capillaries of the skin, gastrointestinal tract, and brain of patients with dermatomyositis similar to that found in patients with Degos disease, suggesting these disease processes are closely related or represent varying degrees of severity on the same pathologic spectrum. We report a case of juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) resembling late-stage Degos disease with gastrointestinal perforations successfully treated with combination rituximab and cyclophosphamide therapy. We systematically reviewed the literature detailing the medical and surgical treatments for gastrointestinal perforation in dermatomyositis, Degos-like dermatomyositis, and Degos disease. In addition to our case, as of October 2019, we identified 36 cases describing gastrointestinal perforation in patients with underlying dermatomyositis, 5 cases of Degos-like dermatomyositis and 17 cases of idiopathic Degos disease. Corticosteroid therapy was used widely for dermatomyositis and Degos-like dermatomyositis, while antiplatelet and anticoagulant medications were chiefly used for patients with idiopathic Degos disease. However, there were no cases that detailed the successful treatment of dermatomyositis or Degos disease with gastrointestinal perforation with rituximab alone or combined with cyclophosphamide. We report that rituximab, in combination with cyclophosphamide, can be used as a novel adjunctive therapy to successfully treat dermatomyositis with Degos-like gastrointestinal perforation.

Evaluation of Rapid vs Standard Infliximab Infusions in the Pediatric Population.

BACKGROUND: Rapid 1-hour infliximab infusions have been safely implemented in adults, but studies of these rapid infusions in pediatric patients are limited. This study's primary objective was to determine the safety of 1-hour infliximab infusions compared with standard 2- to 3-hour infusions in children with inflammatory bowel disease and other autoimmune disorders. METHODS: We conducted an institutional review board-approved prospective study using an unmatched historical control group at a freestanding children's hospital comparing rapid vs standard infusion rates of infliximab and the use of premedications and immunomodulatory agents on the frequency of early and delayed infusion reactions. RESULTS: There were 50 subjects with 540 total standard (2- to 3-hour) infusions in the retrospective group and 66 subjects with 545 total rapid (1-hour) infusions assessed in the prospective group. Although the prospective group received a significantly higher infliximab dose, was significantly less likely to receive premedication, and was significantly more likely to receive another immunomodulatory agent, only 2 instances of potential infusion reactions occurred in the 545 rapid infusions (0.36%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.22%-11.01%; 3% of patients) administered in the prospective group compared with 1 documented infusion reaction (0.19%; 95% CI, 0.0%-11.47%; 2% of patients) in the retrospective group (odds ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.01-12.93; P = 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that rapid infusion of infliximab over 1 hour is not associated with an increased risk of infusion reactions when compared with standard 2- to 3-hour infusions and can be safely used in children with no previous reaction to standard infusions to treat inflammatory bowel disease and other autoimmune diseases.