Safety and immunogenicity of an investigational quadrivalent meningococcal tetanus toxoid conjugate vaccine (MenACYW-TT) co-administered with routine pediatric vaccines in infants and toddlers: A Phase II study.

BACKGROUND: The MenACYW-TT conjugate vaccine is approved for prevention of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) as a single dose in individuals ≥2 years of age in the United States and ≥12 months in EU and some other countries. This Phase II study evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of this vaccine and of concomitant pediatric vaccines in infants/toddlers (6 weeks-15 months of age). METHODS: Five schedules of the MenACYW-TT conjugate vaccine were evaluated in the United States: 2, 4, 6, and 12 months; 2, 4, 6, and 15 months; 2, 4, and 12 months; 6 and 12 months; and 12 months alone. Routine pediatric vaccines (DTaP-IPV/Hib, PCV7/PCV13, MMR, and varicella) were administered per approved schedules. Proportions of participants with serum bactericidal antibodyassay with human complement (hSBA) titers ≥1:4 and ≥1:8, SBA with baby rabbit complement (rSBA) titers ≥1:8 and ≥1:128, and immune responses against concomitant vaccines were determined. RESULTS: Tenderness and irritability were the most frequent solicited injection site and systemic reactions. Similar proportions of participants achieved an hSBA titer ≥1:8 for all four serogroups regardless of whether 2 or 3 doses were administered in the first year of life. Following a second-year dose, 91-100% of participants achieved the threshold for all 4 serogroups in all schedules regardless of the number of doses in the first year of life. Similar responses were seen with rSBA. Immunogenicity and safety profile of concomitant vaccines was similar whether the MenACYW-TT conjugate vaccine was administered or not. CONCLUSION: MenACYW-TT conjugate vaccine administered with pediatric vaccines is safe and immunogenic regardless of the schedule and does not affect the immunogenicity or safety of the concomitant vaccines. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY: NCT01049035.

Efficacy and safety of spinosad and permethrin creme rinses for pediculosis capitis (head lice).

OBJECTIVE: Studies compared spinosad creme rinse and permethrin lice treatment under "actual-use" conditions for pediculosis capitis (head lice). SUBJECTS AND MATERIALS: Two phase-3, multicenter, randomized, evaluator/investigator-blinded studies compared 0.9% spinosad without nit-combing to 1% permethrin with combing (according to product instructions) in 1038 males and females aged > or =6 months. Spinosad-with-combing groups were included for descriptive, noninferential purposes only. Within 391 households, youngest members having > or =3 live lice were designated primary participants. All household members with lice received the same treatment. Participants administered product 1 to 2 times during the 21-day home-use period on the basis of complete lice eradication after a single use or the presence of lice requiring a second treatment. Scalp evaluations were performed at baseline, day 7, and day 14 (and day 21 for participants treated twice). The primary end point was the proportion of lice-free primary participants 14 days after last treatment. RESULTS: A total of 84.6% (study 1) and 86.7% (study 2) of spinosad-treated participants were lice free versus 44.9% and 42.9% permethrin-treated participants (P < .001). Most spinosad-treated participants required 1 application, whereas most permethrin-treated participants required 2 applications. Few adverse events were reported, but those occurring were mild to moderate, including eye irritation (permethrin), ocular hyperemia, and application-site erythema/irritation (both medications). No laboratory measure changed significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Spinosad, which did not require nit combing, was significantly more effective than permethrin in 2 studies reflecting actual-use conditions, and most spinosad-treated participants required only 1 application. Spinosad is a more convenient and effective treatment for pediculosis capitis.