RESUMO
The objective of this study was to improve the sensitivity of ABR recordings in newborns via a procedure that utilizes the ear canal as a recording site. Conventional recordings were compared to ear canal recordings of the ABR in 45 normally-hearing newborns who passed their newborn hearing screening. Responses were obtained at stimulus levels of 80, 60, 40, and 20 dBnHL using forehead (+) to ear canal (-), versus forehead (+) to mastoid (-) electrode configurations. ABR parameters evaluated included measurement of component amplitudes of wave I and V, absolute latencies of I and V, the I-V interwave interval, and amplitude ratio. At stimulus levels of 80, 60, and 40 dBnHL, wave I amplitude was significantly larger using the ear canal configuration. This investigation shows that the amplitude of wave I is significantly larger and easier to identify when the ear canal is used as one of the recording sites in comparison to more conventional scalp (mastoid) recordings.
