Availability of Primary Care Physicians and Racial Disparities in Colorectal Cancer-Related Mortality in the United States.

INTRODUCTION: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States (US), however racial disparities in outcomes persist. We sought to assess the correlation of availability of primary care physicians (PCPs) and racial disparities in CRC-related mortality. METHODS: We studied the correlation between age-adjusted incidence and mortality rates of CRC among all 50 states and the District of Columbia (D.C.) from the Center for Disease Control (CDC) Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (WONDER) with the number of actively practicing PCPs in all 50 states and D.C. from the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) State Physician Workforce Data Report. Pearson's coefficient was used to study correlations and the two-sample t test was used for comparing state-level PCP/CRC ratios between the two groups. Statistical analysis was performed using VassarStats. RESULTS: The mean AAMR per 100,000 population for CRC was significantly higher among AA versus White populations (t = 5.79, p < 0.001). Higher state-wide PCP per CRC case ratio correlated with lower state-wide CRCrelated mortality (r = -0.36, p = 0.011). The mean PCP per CRC case ratio was significantly lower among AA compared to White populations (t = -15.95, p < 0.0001). Higher PCP per CRC case ratio correlated with lower CRC-related mortality among both White (r = -0.64, p < 0.0001) and AA (r = -0.57, p = 0.0002) populations. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that racial disparities in CRC-related mortality may at least in part be related to lower availability of PCPs. Efforts focused on the development of strategies focused on improving access to primary care may help bridge racial disparities in CRC-related outcomes.

Assessing the Educational Value of Pancreatic Cancer Videos on YouTube®.

Online resources such as YouTube® can serve as the go-to resource for patients and their caregivers after a life-changing diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. There is a need to analyze the content and educational value of these videos for patients with pancreatic cancer. The top 100 most viewed videos on pancreatic cancer on YouTube® were assessed and data were collected on various variables such as views, likes, dislikes, and comments. Videos categorized as patient educational videos were further analyzed for their content, source, and educational value. Videos uploaded by patients were the most discussed (p = 0.014) and liked (p = 0.0028) videos on YouTube®. The content of the videos (personal experience, advertisement, patient education, medical professional education, alternative treatments, and increased pancreatic cancer awareness) varied depending on the uploader (patients, healthcare providers, professional societies, media) of the videos (p = 0.0007). Patient education videos were poor in being comprehensive on their education of pancreatic cancer based on our rubric (mean score of 7.67 ± 2.63 of 20 possible points). The current study shows that the educational values of YouTube® videos related to pancreatic cancer remain limited. There is significant room for healthcare providers to use the platform to develop and share comprehensive videos that can be used as more effective sources of patient education.

National trends in hospitalizations among patients with colorectal cancer in the United States.

Colorectal cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States, with a rising incidence, especially in young adults. Care for patients with colorectal cancer is associated with significant healthcare costs and expenditures. We retrospectively interrogated the National Inpatient Sample for admissions in patients with colorectal cancer from 2007 to 2017. A total of 1,962,705 admissions were identified: 50.2% were men, 64.4% were white, and the median age was 68. Most admissions (47.8%) that were coded for anatomical location of malignancy were for ascending colon cancer. The average in-hospital mortality was 4.9%, with a lower mortality in admissions with ascending colon cancer (2.9, P < 0.001). The median length of stay was 5 days, with a longer stay in admissions with transverse colon cancer (9 days, P < 0.0001). The median cost of hospitalization was $12,295 and was significantly higher for patients with descending colon malignancy ($16,369, P < 0.0001). The number of annual hospitalizations stayed steady overall but increased by 98.6% for rectosigmoid cancer. Our findings highlight the high costs of hospitalization and the overall economic burden associated with inpatient admissions among patients with colorectal cancer.

Cardiovascular complications associated with novel agents in the chronic lymphocytic leukemia armamentarium: A pharmacovigilance analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Over the last few years, improved outcomes in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) have been credited to the introduction of novel agents for its treatment. However, the overall cardiovascular safety profile of these agents has not been studied adequately. METHODS: We searched the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database for adverse events reported for several of these novel agents: ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, venetoclax, and idelalisib. RESULTS: A total of 6074 cardiac adverse events were identified; ibrutinib (4832/36581; 13.2%) was found to have the highest risk of cardiac adverse events. The frequency of atrial fibrillation was highest (41.5%) in the ibrutinib group, while the idelalisib and acalabrutinib groups had the highest reported frequencies of heart failure (25.1%) and myocardial infarction (13.6%), respectively. Hypertension was noted to be relatively higher in the acalabrutinib (25.6%) and venetoclax (11.8%) groups. Overall reported mortality associated with cardiac events was highest in the venetoclax (29.4%) and idelalisib (27.1%) groups. CONCLUSION: Novel agents in the CLL armamentarium have been associated with several cardiovascular adverse events. Further studies are needed to identify high-risk groups that would benefit from robust cardiovascular surveillance after initiation of treatment with these novel agents.