RESUMO
PURPOSE: Results of the low-dose radiation therapy (LDRT) in patients with pneumonia due to COVID-19 has been presented. METHODS: Fifteen patients received a single-fraction radiation dose of 1 Gy to the bilateral lungs due to pre-ARDS pneumonia in the course of COVID-19. Follow-up was performed on days 1, 3, 5, 7, 14 after LDRT. RESULTS: Eleven patients (73%) were released up until day 28. Median hospitalization was 20 days; 28-day mortality was 13%. Median O2 saturation improved within 24 h after LDRT in 14/15, with median SpO2 values of 84.5% vs. 87.5% p = 0.016, respectively. At day 14 of hospitalization, 46% did not require oxygen supplementation. Significant decline in CRP and IL-6 was observed within 24 h post LDRT. No organ toxicities were noted. CONCLUSION: LDRT is feasible, well tolerated and may translate to early clinical recovery in patients with severe pneumonia. Further studies are needed to determine optimal candidate, time and dose of LDRT for COVID-19 patients with pneumonia.
RESUMO
Background: To properly configure a treatment planning system, a measurement data set is needed, which consists of the values required for its configuration. The aim is to obtain a dosimetric model of the beam that is as compatible as possible with the measured values. The set of required data can be supplemented with optional values. The aim of the study was to assess the influence of optional measurement data on the compliance of the calculations with the measurements. Materials and methods: Dosimetric measurements, model configuration and dose distribution calculations were performed for the photon radiation beams generated by the VMS TrueBeam® linear accelerator. Beams were configured on an Eclipse™ v. 15.6 system using the Acuros v. 15.6 algorithm. The measured and calculated data were entered into the Alfard™ software for comparison with the calculated dose distributions. In the last stage, the absolute dose values at the designated points were also compared. The obtained data were statistically analysed with Statistica™ v. 13.3. Results: The work showed that the differences in the shape of the beam profile, depth dose and the dose value in points were not related to the use of optional data. Differences in dose distributions are within the tolerance. It cannot be determined under which conditions the use of optional data has a more favourable effect on the reflection of the actual dose values. Conclusions: The use of optional data in modelling photon radiation beams does not significantly improve the compliance of the calculated and measured dose values.
