Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Lab Anim ; 47(2): 122-6, 2013 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23563365

RESUMO

Pharmacokinetics of drugs may differ between small and large mammals (including humans); therefore, drug testing in animal models must be carefully designed. Sprague-Dawley rats were used in cardiac experiments, during which the lopinavir concentration in serum had to match human therapeutic levels (4-10 µg/mL). Lopinavir was administered as a co-formulated drug of lopinavir and ritonavir. It was found that after a single administration of a standard human peroral dose (lopinavir 13.3 mg/kg of body weight), the serum concentration of lopinavir was only one-tenth of the target level. It remained below the minimum target level even after 10-fold the standard dose was administered. After initial pilot tests, a dose escalation study was conducted with oral doses 10- and 15-fold the standard clinical dose of lopinavir (i.e. 133 and 200 mg/kg, respectively). A second administration 2 h later effectively increased and maintained higher concentrations during the experimental ischaemia and reperfusion periods. A dose-dependent increase in serum concentration of the drug was observed. Thus, the target therapeutic serum level of lopinavir in the rats was achieved by administrating 10- to 15-fold the standard human dose twice, separated by a 2 h interval.


Assuntos
Inibidores da Protease de HIV/farmacocinética , Lopinavir/farmacocinética , Isquemia Miocárdica/tratamento farmacológico , Reperfusão Miocárdica/métodos , Ritonavir/farmacocinética , Animais , Cromatografia Líquida de Alta Pressão , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Combinação de Medicamentos , Inibidores da Protease de HIV/administração & dosagem , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/administração & dosagem , Injeções Intraperitoneais , Lopinavir/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Pentobarbital/administração & dosagem , Ratos , Ratos Sprague-Dawley , Ritonavir/administração & dosagem , Especificidade da Espécie
2.
Scand J Lab Anim Sci ; 37(4): 253-259, 2010.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23180906

RESUMO

The purpose of this study was to ascertain if prophylactic ingestion of a diet rich in vitamin E would prevent or impede the development of ulcerative dermatitis in mice on a C57BL/6 background. Mice were fed either a standard mouse diet, vitamin E (99 IU/kg), or a mouse diet fortified with vitamin E (3000 IU/kg) after weaning. Cases of ulcerative dermatitis were recorded by individuals unmasked to the diet assignment. The incidence of ulcerative dermatitis in a retrospective cohort of mice on standard diet was compared with the group on the diet fortified with vitamin E. Age was associated with ulcerative dermatitis in standard diet and vitamin E fortified diet groups, r = 0.43, p-value < 0.0001 and r = 0.18, p-value < 0.02, respectively. The average age of incidence for ulcerative dermatitis in the mice fed the standard diet was 89 weeks and for the mice fed the vitamin E diet it was 41 weeks. The unadjusted odds ratio comparing the incidence of ulcerative dermatitis between the two diet groups was 4.6 with a 95% confidence interval of (2.44, 8.58), χ(2) p-value < 0.0001. Therefore, there was an association between the diets and ulcerative dermatitis, with the mice on the vitamin E fortified diet having almost five times the odds of having ulcerative dermatitis compared with mice on the standard diet. Incidence of ulcerative dermatitis was not influenced by sex or genotype. Our study results show that a diet fortified in vitamin E initiated at weaning does not prevent or impede the development of ulcerative dermatitis in mice on a C57BL/6 background and may accelerate development when administered to young mice.

4.
Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci ; 40(2): 37-9, 2001 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11300687

RESUMO

Swine have supplanted dogs and other large animal species in many biomedical applications and have become the model of choice for numerous areas of research. Anatomic, behavioral, and handling concerns often require pigs to be surgically instrumented for many procedures. Oral dosing in pigs can be accomplished by feeding substances in a palatable substrate, temporarily placing an oral or nasal gastric tube, or permanent surgical placement of an esophagostomy or gastrostomy tube. Oral and nasal gastric tube placement is difficult in conscious, unrestrained animals and is suitable only for short-term enteral access. Placing esophagostomy and gastrostomy tubes is suitable for long-term enteral access and allows easy and rapid administration of substances directly into the stomach. However, these methods frequently require major surgical manipulation for placement. Nonendoscopic percutaneous gastrostomy tube placement is used in companion animals to establish permanent or temporary enteral access. We successfully have adapted this procedure in swine as a method for short-term enteral access. This technique has several advantages over the traditional surgical method for gastrostomy tube placement. It is minimally invasive, results in less animal pain and distress, requires less procedural and recovery time, and is inexpensive. Disadvantages include the potential for splenic entrapment, splenic penetration, perforation of the esophagus, and other complications related to misplacement of the tube or applicator. This paper describes the equipment, technique, and potential complications for placing a nonendoscopic percutaneous gastrostomy tube in swine.


Assuntos
Endoscopia Gastrointestinal/veterinária , Nutrição Enteral/veterinária , Gastrostomia/veterinária , Suínos/cirurgia , Bem-Estar do Animal , Animais , Nutrição Enteral/métodos , Gastrostomia/efeitos adversos , Gastrostomia/métodos , Masculino , Modelos Animais
5.
Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci ; 39(2): 8-13, 2000 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11487232

RESUMO

This study was designed to determine the magnitude and duration of the analgesic effect of three commonly used opioids: buprenorphine (0.5 mg/kg for rats; 2.0 mg/kg for mice), butorphanol (2.0 mg/kg for rats; 5.0 mg/kg for mice), and morphine (10 mg/kg for rats and mice). We used two standard tests, the hot plate and tail flick assays, to measure opioid analgesia in 62 male, 200 to 300 g Sprague-Dawley rats and 61 male, 25 to 35 g ICR mice. We obtained five baseline measurements then administered the drugs subcutaneously. Morphine gave the highest analgesic effect and was intermediate in duration (2 to 3 h in rats and mice) of analgesia. Butorphanol provided the lowest level of and shortest (1 to 2 h in rats and mice) analgesia. Buprenorphine had an intermediate analgesic effect and the longest duration (6 to 8 h in rats and 3 to 5 h in mice). In light of our results, we recommend the use of morphine (with frequent redosing) for severe pain, butorphanol for mild pain of short duration, and buprenorphine for mild to moderate pain of increased duration. The dosing intervals suggested by our study are 2 to 3 h for morphine in both rats and mice, 1 to 2 h for butorphanol in both rats and mice; and 6 to 8 h in rats and 3 to 5 h in mice for buprenorphine.


Assuntos
Analgesia/veterinária , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Bem-Estar do Animal , Buprenorfina/administração & dosagem , Butorfanol/administração & dosagem , Morfina/administração & dosagem , Dor/veterinária , Animais , Esquema de Medicação , Injeções Subcutâneas , Masculino , Camundongos , Camundongos Endogâmicos ICR , Dor/prevenção & controle , Medição da Dor , Limiar da Dor/efeitos dos fármacos , Ratos , Ratos Sprague-Dawley , Cauda/efeitos dos fármacos , Cauda/fisiopatologia , Fatores de Tempo
6.
Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci ; 39(6): 18-23, 2000 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11487247

RESUMO

This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of several analgesic regimens for use after intraperitoneal implantation of telemetry transmitters in mice. The lengths of time required for postoperative recovery of food and water intake, locomotor activity, and core temperature of mice that did not receive postsurgical analgesic medication were compared to those of mice that were given either an analgesic in the drinking water or buprenorphine injections. Many measured variables were not substantially altered by analgesic medications. However, ibuprofen-treated mice demonstrated significantly greater locomotor activity on days 2 through 5 after surgery and a more rapid return to stable postsurgical levels of activity and water intake as compared to those in untreated mice. These changes are consistent with potential analgesic efficacy of the ibuprofen treatment regimen. Buprenorphine injections elicited hyperactivity, hyperthermia, and reduced food and water intake during both the immediate postsurgical recovery period and after apparent recuperation from surgery, as compared to effects observed in saline-treated mice. Evaluating the effect of analgesic regimens on postsurgical changes in physiologic and behavioral variables can be useful in assessing the efficacy of analgesic treatments, but some changes may indicate pharmacologic effects that do not reflect pain relief.


Assuntos
Abdome/cirurgia , Analgesia/veterinária , Dor/veterinária , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/veterinária , Analgesia/métodos , Bem-Estar do Animal , Animais , Masculino , Camundongos , Camundongos Endogâmicos C57BL , Dor/prevenção & controle , Próteses e Implantes/veterinária , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA