Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Drug Res (Stuttg) ; 63(11): 551-7, 2013 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23780504

RESUMO

An open-label, 2-treatment, 3-sequence, 3-period, single-dose, partial replicate crossover studies under fasting (n=48), fed (n=60) and fasting-applesauce (n=48) (sprinkled on one table spoonful of applesauce) modalities were conducted in healthy adult male volunteers to evaluate bioequivalence between 2 formulations of lansoprazole delayed release capsules 30 mg. In all the 3 studies, as per randomization, either test or reference formulations were administered in a crossover manner with a required washout period of at least 7 days. Blood samples were collected adequately (0-24 h) to determine lansoprazole plasma concentrations using a validated LC-MS/MS analytical method. To characterize the pharmacokinetic parameters (Cmax, AUC0-t, AUC0-∞, Tmax, Kel and T1/2) of lansoprazole, non-compartmental analysis and ANOVA was applied on ln-transformed values. The bioequivalence was tested based on within-subject variability of the reference formulation. In fasting and fed studies (within-subject variability>30%) bioequivalence was evaluated with scaled average bioequivalence, hence for the pharmacokinetic parameters Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-∞, the 95% upper confidence bound for (µT-µR)2-θσ2 WR was ≤0, and the point estimates (test-to-reference ratio) were within the regulatory acceptance limit 80.00-125.00%. In fasting-applesauce study (within-subject variability<30%) bioequivalence was evaluated with average bioequivalence, the 90% CI of ln-transformed data of Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ were within the regulatory acceptance limit 80.00-125.00%. Based on these aforesaid statistical inferences, it was concluded that the test formulation is bioequivalent to reference formulation.


Assuntos
Lansoprazol/farmacocinética , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/farmacocinética , Adolescente , Adulto , Cápsulas , Estudos Cross-Over , Preparações de Ação Retardada , Ingestão de Alimentos , Jejum , Humanos , Lansoprazol/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/administração & dosagem , Equivalência Terapêutica
2.
Drug Res (Stuttg) ; 63(5): 250-7, 2013 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23526241

RESUMO

The present study evaluated the bioavailability and bioequivalence of fixed dose combination test formulation (atorvastatin 10 mg and aspirin 150 mg capsule) against marketed reference formulations (Lipitor® tablets 10 mg and Nu-Seals tablets 75 mg). This study was an open label, balanced, randomized, 2-treatment, 2-period, 2-sequence, single dose, crossover trial in 80 healthy adult human volunteers under fasting conditions. Plasma concentrations of atorvastatin, aspirin and salicylic acid were quantified using LC-MS/MS method. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by noncompartmental model and mean pharmacokinetic parameters were comparable between test and reference formulations. The mean pharmacokinetic parameters (AUC0-t, AUC0-∞, Cmax, Cmax /AUC0-t and Cmax/AUC0-∞) for atorvastatin test and reference formulations were (52.69 ng.h/mL, 55.64 ng.h/mL, 9.45 ng/mL, 0.18 1/h and 0.17 1/h) and (52.20 ng.h/mL, 55.38 ng.h/mL, 10.25 ng/mL, 0.20 1/h and 0.19 1/h) respectively; and for aspirin were (1 378.62 ng.h/mL, 1 383.90 ng.h/mL, 1 022.18 ng/mL, 0.75 1/h and 0.75 1/h) and (1 314.17 ng.h/mL, 1 314.50 ng.h/mL, 985.90 ng/mL, 0.75 1/h and 0.75 1/h) respectively. Where as for salicylic acid, above parameters were (42 357.57 ng.h/mL, 44 139.47 ng.h/mL, 9 820.15 ng/mL, 0.24 1/h and 0.23 1/h) and (40 217.08 ng.h/mL, 42 032.44 ng.h/mL, 9 569.18 ng/mL, 0.24 1/h and 0.24 1/h) respectively for test and reference formulations. The 90% confidence intervals of atorvastatin and salicylic acid for AUC0-t, AUC0-∞, Cmax, Cmax /AUC0-t and Cmax/AUC0-∞ parameters were found to be within the acceptable regulatory bioequivalence limits. In conclusion, the new fixed dose combination test formulation was bioequivalent to the reference formulations under fasting conditions.


Assuntos
Aspirina/farmacocinética , Ácidos Heptanoicos/farmacocinética , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/farmacocinética , Pirróis/farmacocinética , Adulto , Área Sob a Curva , Aspirina/administração & dosagem , Atorvastatina , Cápsulas , Estudos Cross-Over , Combinação de Medicamentos , Ácidos Heptanoicos/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Masculino , Pirróis/administração & dosagem , Equivalência Terapêutica
3.
J Drug Assess ; 2(1): 21-9, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27536434

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed relative bioavailability of a new subcutaneous formulation, test (T) (dalteparin sodium 95000 IU/3.8 mL) with the branded product (R) in healthy subjects to meet the regulatory requirements of bioequivalence in the US. METHODS: This was an open label, randomized, single dose, two-sequence, two-period cross-over study under fasting conditions. A total of 88 healthy adult volunteers were randomized to either of the treatment arms (T or R) separated by a washout period of 7 days. Pharmacodynamic surrogates, namely anti-Xa and anti-IIa activity, heparin clotting assay (heptest), and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) were used as a tool to establish bioequivalence between these two formulations. Blood samples were collected up to 36 h post-dose to characterize the primary pharmacokinetic parameters A max, AUC0- t , and AUC0-∞ for anti-Xa and anti-IIa and heptest; parameters (Δt )max and AU(Δt ) for aPTT. RESULTS: For anti-Xa activity, the means (SD) of A max (IU/mL) were 1.34 (0.25) [range = 0.59-2.03] and 1.39 (0.35) [range = 0.65-2.69]; AUC0- t (IU•h/mL) values were 11.4 (2.76) [range = 2.89-19.5] and 12.1 (2.87) [range = 2.52-21.30]; AUC0 - ∞ (IU•h/mL) values were 13.1 (3.59) [range = 3.15-28.2] and 14.5 (4.97) [range = 2.79-36.1] for test and branded formulations, respectively. For anti-IIa activity, the means (SD) of A max (IU/mL) were 0.34 (0.12) [range = 0.14-0.72] and 0.34 (0.13) [range = 0.11-0.84]; AUC0- t (IU•h/mL) values were 2.05 (0.72) [range = 0.61-4.69] and 2.11 (0.76) [range = 0.84-4.80]; AUC0 - ∞ (IU•h/mL) values were 2.47 (0.80) [range = 0.76-6.29] and 2.61 (0.86) [range = 1.31-5.36], for test and branded formulations, respectively. The 90% CI for all the primary pharmacokinetic parameters of all the pharmacodynamic surrogates tested met the regulatory bioequivalence criterion of 80.00-125.00%. CONCLUSION: The test product met the US regulatory criteria of bioequivalence relative to the branded product in this single dose bioequivalence study. Study limitations include open-label single dose design.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...