Efficacy and safety of galantamine in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease: multicentre randomised controlled trial. Galantamine International-1 Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of galantamine in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. DESIGN: Randomised, double blind, parallel group, placebo controlled trial. SETTING: 86 outpatient clinics in Europe and Canada. PARTICIPANTS: 653 patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease. INTERVENTION: Patients randomly assigned to galantamine had their daily dose escalated over three to four weeks to maintenance doses of 24 or 32 mg. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Scores on the 11 item cognitive subscale of the Alzheimer's disease assessment scale, the clinician's interview based impression of change plus caregiver input, and the disability assessment for dementia scale. The effect of apolipoprotein E4 genotype on reponse to treatment was also assessed. RESULTS: At six months, patients who received galantamine had a significantly better outcome on the 11 item cognitive subscale of the Alzheimer's disease assessment scale than patients in the placebo group (mean treatment effect 2.9 points for lower dose and 3.1 for higher dose, intention to treat analysis, P<0.001 for both doses). Galantamine was more effective than placebo on the clinician's interview based impression of change plus caregiver input (P<0.05 for both doses v placebo). At six months, patients in the higher dose galantamine group had significantly better scores on the disability assessment for dementia scale than patients in the placebo group (mean treatment effect 3.4 points, P<0.05). Apolipoprotein E genotype had no effect on the efficacy of galantamine. 80% (525) of patients completed the study. CONCLUSION: Galantamine is effective and well tolerated in Alzheimer's disease. As galantamine slowed the decline of functional ability as well as cognition, its effects are likely to be clinically relevant.

Compliance in depressed patients treated with fluoxetine or amitriptyline. Belgian Compliance Study Group.

Two dimensions of compliance (drop-outs and adherence) were investigated in patients treated with antidepressant drugs. Efficacy, compliance and its determinants were investigated in 66 patients suffering from major depressive disorder and treated in a double-blind manner with fluoxetine 20 mg/day or amitriptyline 150 mg/day for 9 weeks. Overall effectiveness [50% decrease in the initial Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D)] was similar in both groups (62.8% for fluoxetine, 58.1% for amitriptyline). The dropout rate due to side effects was 35.5% for amitriptyline and 5.7% for fluoxetine. A logistic regression analysis revealed that the initial HAM-D score was not predictive for dropping out, but this outcome was instead determined by sex (increased risk for males), age (increased risk for being younger) and occurrence of severe side effects. Adherence was estimated using electronic Medication Event Monitoring System and defined as the percentage of days when the correct dose was taken out of the medication container. Of the patients studied 37% had an adherence of less than 70%. There was no relationship between adherence and efficacy and adherence was similar in patients on fluoxetine or amitriptyline. Side effects were not predictive of being adherent or not, but a higher initial HAM-D score predicted a higher adherence to the medication regimen. The demographic variables had no significant effect. The present study suggests that the link between efficacy, side effects and compliance or adherence is more complex than is generally believed and that early termination and non-adherence seem to be determined by different factors.

Human immunodeficiency virus infection and human African trypanosomiasis: a case-control study in Côte d'Ivoire.

To assess the association between human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and human African trypanosomiasis (HAT) in Côte d'Ivoire, West Africa, a cross-sectional case-control study was conducted on 301 HAT patients recruited in the main foci of the country. For each HAT patient, 3 controls, matched for sex, age and residence, were selected. Data relating to socio-demographic factors and potential risk factors for Trypanosoma brucei gambiense and HIV infections were obtained, and serum samples were collected for HIV-1 and HIV-2 tests. A positive test consisted of enzyme immunoassay reactive to HIV-1, HIV-2 or both and confirmed by a synthetic peptide test or Western blot. Data were analyzed using conditional logistic regression with EGRET software. No statistically significant difference was found between the prevalence of HIV infection in HAT patients and controls (4.3% and 3.5% respectively; crude odds ratio (OR) 1.28, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65-2.50). In multivariate analysis, allowance for 5 covariates did not change the association between the 2 infections (adjusted OR 1.27, 95% CI 0.64-2.52). Although this study had limited statistical power, no significant association was found between HIV infection and T.b. gambiense infection in rural Côte d'Ivoire. Studies are needed to determine whether HIV infection influences the clinical course of HAT, a question not addressed in the present study.