RESUMO
Biofilm formation is a common adaptation enabling bacteria to thrive in various environments and withstand external pressures. In the context of host-microbe interactions, biofilms play vital roles in establishing microbiomes associated with animals and plants and are used by opportunistic microbes to facilitate survival within hosts. Investigating biofilm dynamics, composition, and responses to environmental stressors is crucial for understanding microbial community assembly and biofilm regulation in health and disease. In this study, we explore in vivo colonization and in vitro biofilm formation abilities of core members of the honey bee (Apis mellifera) gut microbiota. Additionally, we assess the impact of glyphosate, a widely used herbicide with antimicrobial properties, and a glyphosate-based herbicide formulation on growth and biofilm formation in bee gut symbionts as well as in other biofilm-forming bacteria associated with diverse animals and plants. Our results demonstrate that several strains of core bee gut bacterial species can colonize the bee gut, which probably depends on their ability to form biofilms. Furthermore, glyphosate exposure elicits variable effects on bacterial growth and biofilm formation. In some instances, the effects correlate with the bacteria's ability to encode a susceptible or tolerant version of the enzyme inhibited by glyphosate in the shikimate pathway. However, in other instances, no such correlation is observed. Testing the herbicide formulation further complicates comparisons, as results often diverge from glyphosate exposure alone, suggesting that co-formulants influence bacterial growth and biofilm formation. These findings highlight the nuanced impacts of environmental stressors on microbial biofilms, with both ecological and host health-related implications. IMPORTANCE: Biofilms are essential for microbial communities to establish and thrive in diverse environments. In the honey bee gut, the core microbiota member Snodgrassella alvi forms biofilms, potentially aiding the establishment of other members and promoting interactions with the host. In this study, we show that specific strains of other core members, including Bifidobacterium, Bombilactobacillus, Gilliamella, and Lactobacillus, also form biofilms in vitro. We then examine the impact of glyphosate, a widely used herbicide that can disrupt the bee microbiota, on bacterial growth and biofilm formation. Our findings demonstrate the diverse effects of glyphosate on biofilm formation, ranging from inhibition to enhancement, reflecting observations in other beneficial or pathogenic bacteria associated with animals and plants. Thus, glyphosate exposure may influence bacterial growth and biofilm formation, potentially shaping microbial establishment on host surfaces and impacting health outcomes.
RESUMO
While foraging for nectar and pollen, bees are exposed to a myriad of xenobiotics, including plant metabolites, which may exert a wide range of effects on their health. Although the bee genome encodes enzymes that help in the metabolism of xenobiotics, it has lower detoxification gene diversity than the genomes of other insects. Therefore, bees may rely on other components that shape their physiology, such as the microbiota, to degrade potentially toxic molecules. In this study, we show that amygdalin, a cyanogenic glycoside found in honey bee-pollinated almond trees, can be metabolized by both bees and members of the gut microbiota. In microbiota-deprived bees, amygdalin is degraded into prunasin, leading to prunasin accumulation in the midgut and hindgut. In microbiota-colonized bees, on the other hand, amygdalin is degraded even further, and prunasin does not accumulate in the gut, suggesting that the microbiota contribute to the full degradation of amygdalin into hydrogen cyanide. In vitro experiments demonstrated that amygdalin degradation by bee gut bacteria is strain-specific and not characteristic of a particular genus or species. We found strains of Bifidobacterium, Bombilactobacillus, and Gilliamella that can degrade amygdalin. The degradation mechanism appears to vary since only some strains produce prunasin as an intermediate. Finally, we investigated the basis of degradation in Bifidobacterium wkB204, a strain that fully degrades amygdalin. We found overexpression and secretion of several carbohydrate-degrading enzymes, including one in glycoside hydrolase family 3 (GH3). We expressed this GH3 in Escherichia coli and detected prunasin as a byproduct when cell lysates were cultured with amygdalin, supporting its contribution to amygdalin degradation. These findings demonstrate that both host and microbiota can act together to metabolize dietary plant metabolites.
Most plants produce chemicals that are toxic to at least some animals. Whether or not the toxins are harmful to a particular animal depends on how much they consume and the specific biochemistry that occurs during digestion. The enzymes produced in the gut both by the animal and by the microbes that reside there often help break down toxic substances into less harmful molecules. However, some products of this breakdown can be toxic themselves. While these products can harm the animal, they may also be detrimental to parasites living in the gut, resulting in an overall positive effect. Almonds and their pollen are consumed by humans and bees without apparent harmful effects. However, almonds contain amygdalin, a molecule that can produce the highly toxic compound hydrogen cyanide upon digestion. Although amygdalin can be toxic to bees in high doses, the amount usually found in almond nectar is not harmful, and indeed, it may protect bees from parasites. Motta et al. wanted to know how amygdalin is digested in the gut of bees, and whether gut microbes have a role in this digestion. To answer these questions, Motta et al. compared the effects of consuming amygdalin on normal bees and bees lacking gut microbes. Bees without gut microbes broke down amygdalin into a harmless substance called prunasin. However, only bees with gut microbes could further break down prunasin into hydrogen cyanide. Interestingly, the full metabolism of amygdalin had no detectable effect on whether the bees survived for longer times or on which microbes were found in the gut. Motta et al. also found some gut bacteria in bees that can break down amygdalin and release hydrogen cyanide, and identified the enzyme responsible for the process. When the gene encoding this enzyme was inserted into a different species of bacteria, the second species gained the ability to break down amygdalin. The findings of Motta et al. explain a role of gut microbes in processing amygdalin in bees. In the future, this may be the key to understanding how humans and other creatures process plant toxins. Future work on the relationship between animals and microbes living in their guts could help scientists understand how to manipulate the digestion and processing of toxins, nutrients, or drugs to benefit human health.
