Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Prosthet Orthot Int ; 2024 Jun 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38896536

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the cultural adaptation and validation in Italian of the Seated Postural Control Measure for Adults 2.0 (SPCMA 2.0). METHODS: The original scale was translated and culturally adapted from French to Italian using the "Translation and Cultural Adaptation of Patient Reported Outcomes Measures-Principles of Good Practice" guidelines. Its internal consistency and test-retest reliability were examined. Its concurrent validity was evaluated using Pearson correlation coefficients with the Italian version of the Wheelchair use Confidence Scale and Wheelchair Skills Test 4.2. RESULTS: Fifty-nine people were evaluated and re-evaluated after 48 h. Most of the items and subscale totals were stable in the 2 evaluations as they reported an intraclass correlation coefficient value of >0.77. The test-retest analysis of the dynamic evaluation was performed on the same patients 48 h apart. The analysis for construct validity showed statistically significant correlations with Wheelchair use Confidence Scale and Wheelchair Skills Test 4.2. CONCLUSIONS: Seated Postural Control Measure for Adults 2.0 is one of the few tools that allow researchers to perform a quantitative and standardized posture assessment in a cost-effective and time-saving way. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that it is an easy-to-administer scale and requires readily available tools. The limitations of this study highlighted above and the need to use quantitative and qualitative tools in clinical practice imply the need to conduct future studies.

2.
Disabil Rehabil ; 27(16): 951-9, 2005 Aug 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16096248

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Clinical measures of seated postural control in adults are not standardized and most are derived from in-house tools. The purpose of this study is to adapt a pediatric instrument to evaluate seated postural control in adult wheelchair users. METHOD: The new instrument is called the Seated Postural Control Measure for Adults (SPCMA) 1.0. Five preliminary versions were pretested with some 20 adults by two raters and a group of experts. RESULTS: This instrument comprises three sections: Section 1, level of sitting scale for adults (1 item, 7-point ordinal scale); Section 2, static postural alignment (22 items, 7-point ordinal scale); and Section 3, postural alignment after a dynamic activity, propulsion of the wheelchair on flat terrain and an incline (22 items, 7-point ordinal scale). CONCLUSIONS: The SPCMA for Adults 1.0 improves the quality and uniformity of evaluations done by different raters, which facilitates more rigorous follow-up of clients over time, communication between professionals, and objective verification of the attainment of intervention objectives.


Assuntos
Pessoas com Deficiência/reabilitação , Postura/fisiologia , Cadeiras de Rodas , Atividades Cotidianas , Adulto , Fenômenos Biomecânicos , Desenho de Equipamento/normas , Humanos , Mecânica , Qualidade de Vida , Quebeque , Cadeiras de Rodas/normas
3.
Disabil Rehabil ; 27(24): 1479-91, 2005 Dec 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16421073

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate the test-retest and interrater reliability of the Seated Postural Control Measure for Adults 1.0 (SPCMA 1.0). METHOD: The participants were evaluated first by two raters and then, 3 weeks later, by one rater. Section 1 (one item, seven-point scale) evaluates the adult's overall ability to control its posture in a sitting position. Sections 2 and 3 (22 items each, scored on a seven-point scale), evaluate the adult's postural alignment in a static position and the changes in postural alignment induced by a dynamic activity. RESULTS: For the test-retest reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of section 1 was excellent (0.95) and moderate to good for sections 2 and 3 (0.60 - 0.62) and their subsections (0.47 - 0.78). For interrater reliability, the three sections had good to excellent ICCs (0.68 - 0.93) and their subsections had moderate to good ICCs (0.41 - 0.69). A large range was observed in Kappa coefficients (test-retest and interrater reliability) for the item analysis of the sections 2 and 3, due to a lack of variability in some items. CONCLUSIONS: The results confirm that the SPCMA is reliable as a whole. Suitable information has been obtained for the development of the SPCMA 2.0 and, although further psychometric testing is needed, the latter should improve clinical evaluation of seated postural control in adult wheelchair users.


Assuntos
Pessoas com Deficiência/reabilitação , Postura/fisiologia , Cadeiras de Rodas/normas , Atividades Cotidianas , Desenho de Equipamento , Análise Fatorial , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Destreza Motora , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Análise e Desempenho de Tarefas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...