Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms Larger than 4 cm: A Retrospective Observational Study of Surgery, Histology, and Outcome.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNENs) are often detected as large primary lesions, even with distant metastases, and their prognosis may be difficult to predict. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we retrieved data of patients treated for a large pNEN in our Surgical Unit (1979-2017) to evaluate the possible prognostic role of clinic-pathological features and surgery. Cox-proportional hazard regression models were used to find possible associations among some variables (clinical features, surgery, and histology) and survival at univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Among 333 pNENs, we identified 64 patients (19%) with a lesion > 4 cm. Patients' median age was 61 years, median tumor size was 6.0 cm, and 35 (55%) patients had distant metastases at diagnosis. There were 50 (78%) nonfunctioning pNENs, and 31 tumors localized in the body/tail region of the pancreas. Overall, 36 patients underwent a standard pancreatic resection (with 13 associated liver resection/ablation). Regarding histology, 67% of pNENs were N1, and 34% were grade 2. After a median follow-up of 48 months (up to 33 years), 42 patients died of disease. Median survival after surgery was 79 months, and six patients experienced recurrence (median DFS 94 months). At multivariate analysis, distant metastases were associated with a worse outcome, while having undergone radical tumor resection was a protective factor. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, about 20% of pNENs have a size > 4 cm, 78% are nonfunctioning, and 55% show distant metastases at diagnosis. Nevertheless, a long-term survival of more than five years may be achieved after surgery.

Genetically Determined Telomere Length Is Associated with Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms Onset.

INTRODUCTION: Telomere length (TL) is a potential indicator of cancer predisposition; however, the multitude of techniques used to measure it causes the results to be heterogeneous and, in some cases, controversial. In the last years, several studies adopted a strategy based on TL-associated genetic variants to generate a polygenic score, often referred as teloscore, used in lieu of direct TL measurement. For pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNEN), this strategy has not been attempted yet. METHODS: A teloscore was generated using 11 SNPs (NAF1-rs7675998, ZNF676-rs409627, TERC-rs10936599, CTC1-rs3027234, PXK-rs6772228, DHX35-rs6028466, OBFC1-rs9420907, ZNF208-rs8105767, ACYP2-rs11125529, TERT-rs2736100, and ZBTB46-rs755017), and 291 PanNEN cases and 1,686 controls collected by the PANcreatic Disease ReseArch (PANDoRA) consortium were genotyped to analyse the association of the teloscore and its individual SNPs with the risk of developing PanNEN. RESULTS: An association between genetically determined long telomeres and the risk of developing PanNEN (OR = 1.99, CI: 1.33-2.98, p = 0.0008) for highest versus median (third) quintile was observed. In addition, two novel SNPs associated with PanNEN risk were identified: ZNF676-rs409627 (ORC/C_vs_G/G = 2.27, CI: 1.58-3.27, p = 8.80 × 10-6) and TERT-rs2736100 (ORC/A_vs_C/C = 2.03, CI: 1.42-2.91, p = 1.06 × 10-4). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, this study provides for the first time a clear indication of the association between long genetically determined telomeres and increased risk of developing PanNEN.

Pancreatic solid pseudopapillary neoplasm in male patients: systematic review with three new cases.

Pancreatic solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (pSPN) is a rare exocrine neoplasm, which generally occurs in young women. This study analyses the clinical characteristics of pSPN in male patients through a systematic review of the literature, adding three new cases from our institution. We reviewed our experience in Pspns, and we performed a systematic review of pSPN of all articles published in English in PubMed and SCOPUS from 1980. Using the final included articles, we evaluated clinic-pathological features, surgical treatment and prognosis of male patients affected by pSPN. From the literature review and our cases, we collected 246 male patients with a proven pSPN. Mean age was 34.3 (range 4-78) years, with 26.2% patients younger than 18 years. Patients were asymptomatic in 35.9% of cases, despite a mean tumour size of 6.3 cm. In 63.7% of cases, the pSPN was located in the body-tail region. Distant metastases were reported at diagnosis in only 10 (4.1%) patients. A correct pre-operative diagnosis (including cytopathology) was provided in 53.6% of patients, with only 40 fine-needle aspiration/biopsy performed. Standard pancreatic resections represented 90.4% of surgical procedures. Beta-catenin and progesterone receptors were positive at immunostaining in 100% and 77.8% of cases, respectively. Fourteen (7.2%) patients relapsed after a mean disease-free survival of 43.1 months. After a mean follow-up of 47 (range 4-180) months, 89.5% of patients were alive and disease-free. Although rare, when dealing with a solid-cystic pancreatic mass, even in asymptomatic male patients, a pSPN should be considered as a possible diagnosis.