Liver resection versus ablation in geriatric populations - Does one method impart improved in-hospital mortality?

Objectives: This study aimed to compare surgical resection versus ablation for managing liver malignancies in patients 65 and older. Material and Methods: Cases with liver tumors were extracted from the NSQIP database for patients aged ≥65 years. Following propensity score matching, multivariate Cox regression was used for 30-day morbidity and mortality for liver resection and ablation. Results: Following a propensity score matching, 1048 patients were 1:1 matched for comorbid conditions. Patients stayed in the hospital three days longer after resection (p<0.001). Mortality was lower after ablation (p= 0.013). This difference was more prominent in patients with primary liver tumors (p= 0.008). Group A had a 10-fold lower risk of developing an abdominal abscess, a fourfold decrease in hospital-associated pneumonia (p= 0.001) and reintubation, a 10-fold reduction in bleeding requiring transfusion (p<0.001), and a three-fold decrease in risk of developing sepsis (p<0.001). Conclusion: Despite being a generally sicker patient population with worse underlying liver function, ablative techniques were associated with a lower risk of adverse outcomes when compared to more aggressive resection of primary malignant tumors of the liver.

An assessment of perioperative outcomes for open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy in New York State.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive techniques for pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) are increasing in practice, however, data remains limited regarding perioperative outcomes. Our study sought to compare patients undergoing open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) with those undergoing laparoscopic (LPD) or robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD). METHODS: Patients who underwent PD during 2016-2018 were identified from the New York State Planning and Research Cooperative System database. RESULTS: Of the 1954 patients identified, 1708 (87.4%) underwent OPD, 165 (8.4%) underwent LPD, and 81 (4.2%) underwent RPD. The majority of patients were White (63.8%), males (53.3%) with a mean age of 65.4 years. RPD patients had a lower median Charlson Comorbidity Index (2) than OPD (3) or LPD (3, p = 0.01) and had a lower 30-day rate of complications (35.8% vs. 48.3% vs. 43.6% respectively, p = 0.05). After propensity-score matching, however, there were no differences between the groups regarding overall complications, surgical site infections, anastomotic leaks, or mortality (p = NS for all). OPD demonstrated a longer length of stay (median 8 days) compared to LPD (7 days) or RPD (7 days, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing LPD and RPD have a shorter length of hospital stay compared to OPD and there was no difference in overall morbidity or mortality when matched to similar patients.

Analysis of the National Cancer Database Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) has been poorly studied, approached with therapeutic nihilism, and likely undertreated. We studied the impact of clinical and patient factors on the survival of ESCC in the United States. METHODS: We selected patients with stage I to III ESCC from 2004 to 2013, using the National Cancer Database. Patients were categorized into the following treatment modalities: (1) definitive chemoradiation therapy (CR), (2) neoadjuvant therapy followed by esophageal resection (ER), (3) ER alone, and (4) ER followed by adjuvant therapy. Our main outcome measure was overall survival. RESULTS: We identified 11,229 patients with ESCC undergoing definitive CR (78.6%); neoadjuvant therapy followed by ER (8.5%), ER alone (10.1%), and ER followed by adjuvant therapy (2.6%). Compared with neoadjuvant therapy, both ER alone and definitive CR were associated with substantially increased mortality. Patients treated at high-volume centers (>20), regardless of whether they underwent ER, had improved survival compared with facilities that performed 10 to 19, 5 to 9, and less than 5 ERs per year. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated at high-volume facilities were more likely to receive neoadjuvant therapy, and there was a marked inverse relationship between annual surgical volume and long-term survival for both surgically and non-surgically treated patients with stage I to III ESCC.

Patient outcomes related to the daytime versus after-hours surgery: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: It has been investigated in multiple subspecialties that surgery timing may have an impact on patient outcomes, yet no definitive evidence is reached. OBJECTIVES: To analyze current literature on this topic and investigate whether day versus after-hours surgery may have an effect on postoperative outcomes. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies reporting on the surgery timing as well as postoperative mortality and morbidity were included. PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS: There were 119,213 and 46,196 surgery cases that occurred during daytime and after-hours shifts, respectively. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: Thirteen studies (12 retrospective case controls and 1 prospective study) published in English between February 2003 and May 2018 were scrutinized by two reviewers. The odds ratio (OR) for each clinical outcome data was presented with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Pooled estimates of effects were calculated using random-effect models. RESULTS: Among the included studies, 10 reported morbidities and 10 reported death rates. The pooled OR was 0.67 (95% CI: 0.51-0.89; p = 0.005) for postoperative mortality and 0.71 (95% CI: 0.53-0.94; p = 0.02) for overall postoperative complications in patients who underwent daytime versus after-hours surgery. CONCLUSION: After-hours surgery was associated with significantly increased postoperative mortality and morbidity, which might be related to state of urgency, availability of resource and/or fatigue factor of the personnel.

Perioperative and Survival Outcomes Following Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX versus Gemcitabine Abraxane in Patients with Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

CONTEXT: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is increasingly used in borderline resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer to facilitate surgical resection. OBJECTIVE: To compare progression free survival and overall survival in patients receiving neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX with those receiving gemcitabine/abraxane. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: University of Colorado Hospital from 2012-2016. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. INTERVENTIONS: Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine/abraxane. OUTCOME MEASURES: Perioperative outcomes, progression free survival, and overall survival were compared between groups. A multivariate Cox proportional hazard model was applied to evaluate survival outcomes. RESULTS: We identified 120 patients: 83 (69.2%) FOLFIRINOX and 37 (30.8%) gemcitabine/abraxane. The FOLIFRINOX group was younger and had a lower ECOG performance status (p<0.05). Patients in the FOLFIRINOX group were more likely to undergo surgical resection compared to gemcitabine/abraxane (66.3% vs. 32.4%, p=0.002). Among all patients, median follow up was 16.9 months and FOLFIRINOX was associated with improved PFS (15.3 vs. 8.2 months, p=0.006), but not overall survival (23.5 vs. 18.7 months, p=0.228). In these patients, insulin-dependent diabetes was associated with a worse progression free survival and overall survival and surgical resection was protective. Among surgically resected patients, median follow up was 21.1 months and there was no difference in progression free survival (19.5 vs. 15.1 months) or overall survival (27.4 vs. 19.8 months) between the FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine/abraxane groups, respectively (p>0.05). Insulin-dependent diabetes and a poor-to-moderate pathologic response was associated with worse progression free survival and overall survival. CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX may improve progression free survival by increasing the proportion of patients undergoing surgical resection. Improved understanding of the role for selection bias and longer follow up are needed to better define the impact of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX on overall survival.

Perioperative outcomes and survival following neoadjuvant stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To compare outcomes in patients receiving neoadjuvant stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with those receiving intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. METHODS: We analyzed patients receiving neoadjuvant SBRT for borderline resectable (BRPC) and locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) (2012-2016). Differences in baseline characteristics, perioperative outcomes, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared. RESULTS: Seventy-five (82.4%) patients received SBRT and 16 (17.6%) received IMRT. There were no differences in surgical resection rates in the SBRT (n = 38, 50.7%) and IMRT (n = 11, 68.8%) groups (P = 0.188). Among resected patients, there was no difference in postoperative outcomes or pathologic outcomes including lymph node status, margin status, lymphovascular and perineural invasion, or pathologic response to neoadjuvant treatment (P > 0.05). Among all patients, median PFS and OS were 9.9 and 23.5 months in the SBRT group, respectively, and 15.3 and 21.8 months in the IMRT group, respectively (P > 0.05). Similarly, there was no difference in PFS or OS between groups when stratified by BRPC, LAPC, and surgically resected patients (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In the neoadjuvant setting, SBRT and IMRT appear to have similar rates of resection, perioperative outcomes, and survival outcomes, but additional studies with increased sample size and longer follow up are needed.

SPECT/CT Adds Distinct Lymph Node Basins and Influences Radiologic Findings and Surgical Approach for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Head and Neck Melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Planar lymphoscintigraphy (PL) has a lower detection rate of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in head and neck melanoma compared with other sites. We assessed situations when single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) identified nodes not seen by PL. We also evaluated the impact of SPECT/CT on surgical approach and oncologic outcomes. METHODS: Patients who underwent SLN biopsy (SLNB) for head and neck melanoma with PL and SPECT/CT between November 2011 and December 2016 were included. Surgeons and radiologists completed a real-time survey inquiring about the utility of SPECT/CT. Patients were divided into two groups: patients with nodal basins identified by both PL and SPECT/CT ('PL + SPECT/CT'), and patients in whom SPECT/CT identified additional nodal basins not seen on PL ('SPECT/CT only'). Patient demographics and long-term outcomes including follow-up duration, recurrence, and survival are described. RESULTS: In the PL + SPECT/CT group, 73 (61.9%) patients were included and 45 (38.1%) patients were included in the SPECT/CT-only group. SPECT/CT added 51 basins to those seen on PL, primarily in the supraclavicular region (43.1%). Eighteen patients had positive node(s) in the PL + SPECT/CT group compared with two patients in the SPECT/CT-only group. Surgeons reported that 81% of the time, SPECT/CT influenced the location of incision for SLNB. CONCLUSIONS: SPECT/CT influences the location of incision and contributes most to identification of nodes in the supraclavicular region. It also detects additional SLN basins when compared with PL. Further studies are necessary to determine when these additional basins require sampling.

Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: changing the management of ampullary neoplasms.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to present the largest reported series comparing open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) to total laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (TLPD) in patients with ampullary neoplasms. METHODS: Patients undergoing OPD or TLPD for ampullary neoplasms from June 2012 to August 2016 were retrospectively identified. Perioperative outcomes were compared using a Wilcoxon rank-sum test, Student's t test, and Chi square analysis where appropriate. Kaplan-Meier estimates for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between the groups using the log-rank test. RESULTS: We identified 47 patients with ampullary neoplasms (adenocarcinoma n = 36, neuroendocrine tumor n = 7, undifferentiated n = 1, adenoma n = 3) undergoing OPD (n = 25) and TLPD (n = 22). The proportion of patients being offered TLPD has progressively increased every year over 5 years: 0% (2012) to 50% (2015). There were no differences in baseline variables between the two groups. TLPD was associated with less blood loss (300 vs. 500 mL, p < 0.001) and shorter operative times (314 vs. 359 min, p = 0.024). No patient required conversion to an open procedure and there were no perioperative deaths in either group. TLPD was associated with lower rates of intra-abdominal abscess (0 vs. 16.0%, p = 0.049), but there were no differences in rates of pancreatic fistula, bile leak, delayed gastric emptying, wound infection, length of stay, and readmission (all p > 0.05). Among patients with adenocarcinoma, there was no difference in pathological features between the two groups (p > 0.05) and all patients had negative margins. At a median follow up of 25 months, there was no difference in PFS or OS between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: TLPD in patients with ampullary neoplasms results in improved perioperative outcomes while having equivalent short and long-term oncologic outcomes compared to the traditional open approach.

Comparison of laparoscopic to open pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of the study is to compare perioperative and survival outcomes in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) to those undergoing open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD). METHODS: Patients aged ≥ 75 years with pancreatic adenocarcinoma undergoing LPD or OPD were identified from the NCDB (2010-2013). Baseline characteristics and perioperative outcomes were compared using a χ 2 and Student's t test. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to generate survival curves, and differences were tested using a log-rank test. A multivariate cox proportional hazard model was applied to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) of LPD on overall survival (OS). RESULTS: We identified 1768 patients aged ≥ 75 years who underwent LPD (n = 248, 14.0%) or OPD (n = 1520, 86.0%). The majority of patients in the LPD group had their surgery at facilities performing less than 5 LPDs per year (n = 165, 66.5%). 90-day mortality was significantly lower in the LPD compared to the OPD (7.2 vs. 12.2%, p = 0.049). The laparoscopic conversion rate was 30% (n = 74) and was associated with higher readmission rates (13.5 vs. 8.1%), 30-day mortality (8.0 vs. 3.8%), and 90-day mortality (10.4 vs. 6.0%), but these did not reach statistical significance. Median OS was significantly longer in the LPD group (19.8 vs. 15.6 months, p = 0.022). After adjusting for patient and tumor-related characteristics, there was a trend towards improved survival in the LPD group (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.69-1.03). CONCLUSION: The vast majority of the NCDB participating facilities perform less than 5 LPD cases per year, which was associated with an increased risk of perioperative mortality. Overall 90-day mortality was significantly lower in the LPD group and there was a trend towards improved OS in the LPD group compared to the OPD group after adjusting for patient and tumor-related characteristics. Studies with increased sample size and longer follow-up are needed before definitive conclusions can be made.

Implications of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Perfusion-Related Hyperglycemia.

BACKGROUND: Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) administration can be associated with hyperglycemia during perfusion. Little is known about this effect, and no previous studies have examined patient characteristics associated with perfusion-related hyperglycemia. METHODS: We retrospectively identified consecutive patients at a single institution treated with HIPEC from 8/2003 to 10/2016 who had intraoperative blood glucose measured. Hypertonic 1.5% dextrose-containing peritoneal dialysate was used as carrier solution in all patients. Comparisons were made using parametric [Student's t test, analysis of variance (ANOVA)], and nonparametric tests (χ 2, Kruskal-Wallis) where appropriate. RESULTS: There were 85 patients identified, with average age of 53 ± 12 years, 69 (81%) with appendiceal or colorectal peritoneal cancer. Most patients were perfused with mitomycin C (69%) or oxaliplatin (24%). Intraoperative hyperglycemia (> 180 mg/dL) affected the majority of patients (86%), with values up to 651 mg/dL. Insulin was required for treatment in 66% of patients. Peak hyperglycemia occurred within an hour of perfusion in 91%, and resolved by postoperative day one in 91% of patients. Glucose > 309 mg/dL (highest quartile) was associated with longer operating time (p = 0.03) and with use of oxaliplatin compared with mitomycin C (p = 0.01). No association was found with other comorbidities, peritoneal carcinomatosis index score, or postoperative outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients experience hyperglycemia during HIPEC. This is not clearly associated with patient factors, and may be due to use of dextrose-containing carrier solution. Since perioperative hyperglycemia has potential negative impact, use of dextrose-containing carrier solution should be questioned and is worth investigating further.

Evaluation of the efficacy of dasatinib, a Src/Abl inhibitor, in colorectal cancer cell lines and explant mouse model.

BACKGROUND: Dysregulation of the Src pathway has been shown to be important at various stages of cancer. Dasatinib is a potent Src/Abl inhibitor and has demonstrated to have anti-proliferative and anti-invasive activity in many preclinical models. The objective of this study was to determine the anti-tumor activity of dasatinib using in vitro and in vivo preclinical colorectal (CRC) models. METHODS: CRC cell lines and patient-derived tumor explant (PDX) models were used to investigate the efficacy of dasatinib. We treated 50 CRC cell lines with dasatinib for 72 hours and proliferation was assayed by a sulforhodamine B (SRB) assay; an IC50 ≤ 0.08 µmol/L was considered sensitive. We treated 17 patient-derived CRC explants with dasatinib (50 mg/kg/day, administered once-daily) for 28 days to determine in vivo efficacy. Tumor growth inhibition (TGI) ≥ 50% was considered sensitive. RESULTS: We found that 8 out of 50 CRC cell lines reached an IC50 ≤ 0.08 µmol/L with dasatinib treatment. In addition, of 17 CRC explants grown in the xenograft mouse model, 2 showed sensitivity to dasatinib. The anti-tumor effects observed in this study were a result of G1 cell cycle arrest as the dasatinib sensitive CRC cell lines exhibited G1 inhibition. Moreover, those CRC cell lines that were responsive (0.08 µmol/L) to treatment demonstrated a significant baseline increase in Src and FAK gene expression. CONCLUSION: Dasatinib demonstrated significant anti-proliferative activity in a subset of CRC cell lines in vitro, especially in those with increased Src expression at baseline, but only showed modest efficacy in CRC explants. Dasatinib is currently being studied in combination with chemotherapy in patients with advanced CRC, as its use as a single agent appears limited.

Impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiation on perioperative outcomes in patients with rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer is associated with lower local recurrence rates. The objective of this study is to assess the impact of neoadjuvant therapy on perioperative complications in patients with rectal cancer. METHODS: Using the ACS-NSQIP database (2005-2012), a propensity score was used to match 3592 patients with rectal cancer receiving neoadjuvant therapy to 3592 patients undergoing surgery alone. The association between neoadjuvant chemoradiation and perioperative outcomes was evaluated. RESULTS: Among all patients, overall morbidity was significantly higher in the neoadjuvant therapy group (n = 1170, 29.9%) compared to the surgery alone (n = 2350, 26.4%; P < 0.0001), but 30-day mortality was lower in the neoadjuvant group (n = 27, 0.7%) compared to the surgery alone group (n = 112, 1.3%; P = 0.0043). However, in propensity-matched patients, there was no difference in overall morbidity (OR 0.912, 95% CI 0.825-1.008) or 30-day mortality (OR 0.639, 95% CI 0.38-1.05). Overall morbidity and 30-day mortality were 29.3% (n = 1054) and 0.7% (n = 25) in the neoadjuvant group, respectively, compared to 31.3% (n = 1124) and 1.1% (n = 39) in the surgery alone group, respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients with newly diagnosed rectal cancer could be evaluated for neoadjuvant therapy prior to surgical resection without the fear of upfront therapy causing a significant increase in perioperative complications.

Is Chemical Pyloroplasty Necessary for Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy?

BACKGROUND: Many centers use botulinum toxin for chemical pyloroplasty in minimally invasive esophagectomies as prophylaxis against delayed gastric emptying. No previous studies have compared botulinum toxin injection with no pyloric intervention for patients treated with a combined laparoscopic and thoracoscopic approach. The authors hypothesized that chemical pyloroplasty does not improve outcomes for these patients. METHODS: The study investigated patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomies from September 2009 to June 2015. Delayed gastric emptying was defined as inability to tolerate a soft diet by postoperative day 10, as corroborated by esophagram, upper endoscopy, or both. Data were compared using Student's t test, χ 2 analysis, and Mann-Whitney U test where appropriate. RESULTS: The study identified 71 patients treated with minimally invasive esophagectomy: 35 patients with chemical pyloroplasty treated from September 2009 to January 2014 and 36 patients without pyloric intervention from February 2014 to June 2015. The groups were statistically similar in age, gender distribution, T stage, percentage of patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy, body mass index, preoperative weight loss, preoperative serum albumin, and preoperative placement of feeding tubes (all p > 0.05). The overall incidence of delayed gastric emptying was low in both groups: 8.6% (3/35) of the patients with chemical pyloroplasty versus 5.6% (2/36) of the patients with no pyloric intervention (p = 0.62). The two groups also did not differ significantly in the development of aspiration pneumonia or the need for pyloric intervention. CONCLUSIONS: In a well-matched cohort study with a historical control group, use of botulinum toxin for chemical pyloroplasty in minimally invasive esophagectomies was not associated with improved outcomes related to the pylorus versus no pyloric intervention. Although preliminary, these data suggest that chemical pyloroplasty is not necessary in minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Implications of Sentinel Lymph Node Drainage to Multiple Basins in Head and Neck Melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for head and neck melanoma is challenging due to unpredictable drainage. We sought to determine the frequency of drainage to multiple lymphatic basins and asked if this was associated with prognosis in a large, single-center cohort. METHODS: We queried patients diagnosed with head and neck melanomas who had a SLNB performed from January 1998 to April 2016. Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared using Student's t test, Pearson chi-square analysis, log-rank test, Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test, and Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: We identified 269 patients with head and neck melanoma that had SLNBs performed in the following locations: 223 neck, 92 parotid/preauricular, 29 occipital/posterior auricular, 1 axilla. There were 68 (25%) patients who had drainage to multiple basins. These patients were similar to those with single basin drainage in age, gender distribution, Breslow depth, and percent with a positive SLNB (all p > 0.05). Fewer patients with drainage to multiple basins had a completion lymph node dissection (CLND, p = 0.03). A trend toward increased 3-year locoregional recurrence was seen for patients with drainage to multiple basins in univariate analysis (27% vs. 18%, p = 0.10) but was lost in multivariate analysis (p = 0.49), possibly because of higher recurrence rates in patients with positive nodes but no CLND (p = 0.02). No difference was detected for distant recurrence or overall survival based on SLN drainage. CONCLUSIONS: Head and neck melanoma SLNB drainage to multiple basins is common. Drainage to multiple basins does not seem to be associated with increased sentinel lymph node positivity, locoregional recurrence, distant recurrence, or survival.

Impact of Facility Type and Surgical Volume on 10-Year Survival in Patients Undergoing Hepatic Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have demonstrated improved in-hospital mortality after hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at teaching hospitals. The objective of this study was to evaluate if resection of HCC at academic cancer programs (ACP) is associated with improved 10-year survival. STUDY DESIGN: Using the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) (1998 to 2011), we evaluated patients undergoing hepatic resection for HCC at ACPs, comprehensive community cancer programs (CCCPs), and community cancer programs (CCPs). High volume cancer programs (HVCPs) were defined as performing 10 or more hepatectomies per year. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models by stepwise selection were applied to estimate hazard ratios (HR) of predictors of survival. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to generate survival curves at each facility type, and survival rates were compared using the log-rank test. RESULTS: We identified 12,757 patients undergoing hepatic resection for HCC at ACPs (n = 8,404), CCPs (n = 483), and CCCPs (n = 3,870). Sixty-two percent (n = 5,191) of patients treated at ACPs were at high volume institutions compared with 11.6% (n = 446) and 0% of CCCPs and CCPs, respectively (p < 0.0001). On multivariable analysis, patients undergoing hepatic resection at transplant centers (p < 0.0001) and HVCPs had significantly improved survival (p < 0.0001). Adjusted 10-year survival rates were 28.7% at high volume ACPs, 28.2% at high volume CCCPs, 24.9% at low volume CCCPs, 25.1% at low volume ACPs, and 21.3% at CCPs (p ≤ 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing hepatic resection for HCC at HVCPs had a significantly improved 10-year survival. Regionalization of HCC treatment to HVCPs may improve long-term survival.

The Multidisciplinary Approach to GI Cancer Results in Change of Diagnosis and Management of Patients. Multidisciplinary Care Impacts Diagnosis and Management of Patients.

BACKGROUND: The multidisciplinary approach to GI cancer is becoming more widespread as a result of multimodality therapy. At the University of Colorado Hospital (UCH), we utilize a formal multidisciplinary approach through specialized clinics across a variety of settings, including pancreas and biliary cancer, esophageal and gastric cancer, liver cancer and neuroendocrine tumors (NET), and colorectal cancer. Patients with these suspected diagnoses are seen in a multidisciplinary clinic. We evaluated whether implementation of disease-specific multidisciplinary programs resulted in a change in diagnosis and/or change in management for these patients. METHODS: Data from 1747 patients were prospectively collected from inception of each multidisciplinary program through December 31, 2015. Change in diagnosis was defined as a change in radiographic or endoscopic findings that resulted in a change in cancer stage or clinical diagnosis and/or a change in pathologic diagnosis. Reports of incidental findings unrelated to primary diagnosis on radiographic evaluation were also assessed, but not included in overall change in diagnosis findings. We further evaluated if patients had a change in the management of their disease compared with outside recommendations. RESULTS: Of 1747 patients evaluated, change occurred in 38 % (pancreas and biliary), 13 % (esophageal and gastric); 22 % (liver and NET), and 16 % (colorectal). Change in management for each multidisciplinary program occurred in 35 % (pancreas and biliary), 20 % (esophageal and gastric), 27 % (liver and NET), and 13 % (colorectal). CONCLUSIONS: The use of a multidisciplinary clinic to manage GI cancer has a substantial impact in change in diagnosis and/or management in more than one-third of patients evaluated.

A matched-cohort analysis of 192 pancreatic anaplastic carcinomas and 960 pancreatic adenocarcinomas: A 13-year North American experience using the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB).

BACKGROUND: Anaplastic pancreatic carcinoma (APC) is a rare and poorly characterized disease. We sought to compare the clinical characteristics and outcomes of APC to pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS: The American National Cancer Data Base was queried for patients with resected APC and PDAC using histologic and operative codes. APC cases were matched 1:5 with PDACs based on age, sex, pathologic tumor stage, operative margin status, lymph node positivity ratio, and use of adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: After 1:5 matching, 192 APCs and 960 PDACs were analyzed. When comparing APC vs PDAC the median tumor size was 45 mm (interquartile range, 33-60) vs 30 mm (interquartile range, 23-40; P < .001), and metastatic nodal disease was present in 40.6% and 38.0% of the cases (P = .25), respectively. APC cases were distributed equally between the head and the body/tail region of the pancreas (50%), while PDAC cases were located mainly in the head of the pancreas (75%; P < .001). Although the resected APC group had a lesser survival during the first year after the diagnosis (51% vs 69%; P = .029), the overall survival was similar in the 2 groups, with 21.6% vs 17.4% alive at 5 years, respectively for APC and PDAC (P = .32). Subgroup analysis of patients with APC with (n = 18) versus those without (n = 80) osteoclastlike giant cells showed a greater 5-year survival (50% versus 15%, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Patients with resected APC tend to present with large tumors equally distributed between the head and body/tail of the pancreas. While APC is thought to have a more aggressive biology, our matched analysis showed similar overall survival compared with PDAC. The presence of osteoclastlike giant cells portends a significantly better prognosis compared with other histologic features of APCs.