Tumour-free distance from serosa is a better prognostic indicator than depth of invasion and percentage myometrial invasion in endometrioid endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prognostic performance of tumour-free distance (TFD) compared with depth of invasion (DOI) and percentage of myometrial invasion (MI). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Regional gynaecological oncology centre. POPULATION: All women identified with stage I-III endometrioid endometrial carcinoma from January 2000 to December 2007, who had surgery at the Northern Gynaecological Oncology Centre (NGOC). METHODS: Surgicopathological, follow-up and survival data were collected. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed comparing TFD, DOI and MI with known prognostic factors. The prognostic accuracy of TFD was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses, and an optimum cut-off was proposed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Death from disease, recurrence and pelvic lymph node involvement. RESULTS: A total of 288 women were identified. The median follow-up time was 67 months, with 40 recurrences and 32 disease-related deaths. When TFD, DOI and MI were separately examined in multivariate analyses with other covariates, TFD was an independent predictor of death from disease (HR 1.22; 95% CI 1.00-1.48; P = 0.05). In multivariate analyses including all three measures together (TFD, DOI and MI), TFD was an independent predictor of death from disease (HR 1.49; 95% CI 1.03-2.16; P = 0.04) and recurrence (HR 1.39; 95% CI 1.01-1.91; P = 0.05). TFD was also an independent predictor of lymph node involvement when examined separately (OR 0.74; 95% CI 0.56-0.96; P = 0.03), and together with DOI and MI (OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.49-0.92; P = 0.01), in women who had pelvic lymphadenectomy (n = 86). A TFD cut-off of 1.75 mm showed good prognostic performance. CONCLUSIONS: The TFD measure may be a more accurate method of representing myometrial invasion in the staging for endometrial cancer.

Interventions for reducing anxiety in women undergoing colposcopy.

BACKGROUND: Before cervical cancer develops the cells of the cervix become abnormal. Following an abnormal cervical smear colposcopy is performed. Colposcopy is the visualisation of the cervix using a binocular microscope. Women experience high levels of anxiety and negative emotional responses at all stages of cervical screening. High levels of anxiety before and during colposcopy can have adverse consequences, including pain and discomfort during the procedure and high loss to follow-up rates. This review evaluates interventions designed to reduce anxiety levels during colposcopic examination. OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of various interventions aimed at reducing anxiety during colposcopic examination in women. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), (Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2006) MEDLINE (1951-2006), EMBASE (1980-2006), CINAHL (1982-2006), Psych Lit and CancerLit, NHMRC Clinical Trials Register, UKCCCR Register of Cancer Trials, Meta-Register and Physician Data Query Protocols. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi randomised controlled trials of interventions to reduce anxiety during colposcopic examination. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: One author searched the citations and reference lists. Studies that appeared to meet inclusion criteria were retrieved and assessed independently by the remaining three authors. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group's methodological quality criteria (van Tulder 2003). MAIN RESULTS: Eleven trials were included, these trials used various interventions to reduce anxiety. These examined 1441 women's anxiety levels after different types of intervention. These included: Information leaflets - (proved not to be associated with anxiety reduction). Counselling: pre-colposcopic counselling was not associated with anxiety reduction. Information leaflets and information video and pre-colposcopy counselling was not associated with a reduction in anxiety levels. Listening to music during colposcopy: this intervention was associated with reduction in anxiety levels (p < 0.002). Video colposcopy was associated with reduction in anxiety levels, and the reduction in anxiety was significant (p < 0.0002). Information using graphs and verbal information and information video versus information only when sought: There was no significant reduction in the level of anxiety in the intervention group. Information leaflets and information video versus information leaflets only: There was a reduction in anxiety levels in the intervention group compared to the control group (p < 0.00001). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Anxiety appears to be reduced by playing music during colposcopy, showing information videos prior to colposcopy and viewing video colposcopy during the procedure. Although information leaflets did not reduce anxiety levels, they did increase knowledge levels and so are useful in obtaining clinical consent to the colposcopic procedure.

A randomized controlled study of peritoneal closure at cesarean section.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the benefits or problems that may be associated with peritoneal closure at cesarean section. METHODS: A randomized-controlled study of women undergoing cesarean section in Sultan Qaboos University Hospital Maternity Unit. After the decision is taken for cesarean section, women were randomized to either repair of peritoneum using standard technique or non-repair of peritoneum. Duration of operation, maternal morbidity, blood loss assessed by post-operative hemoglobin change and requirement of transfusion, post operative infection, thromboembolic disease, and length of hospital stay were analyzed in 2 groups of patients. Sixty women were randomized into the study, 30 group A, had peritoneal closure and 30, group B, and had non-closure. RESULTS: The average duration of operation for group A was 61.9+/-12.734, and for group B was 53.56 +/-11.209 (p< 0.01 statistically significant). There was no statistically significant difference in the length of stay, estimated blood loss, the mean drop in hemoglobin, postoperative pyrexia, and wound infection rate between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our study has confirmed the previous study findings, and has shown that there are no advantages in suturing of the peritoneum in terms of blood loss, blood transfusion, operation duration, postoperative pyrexia and wound infection. In fact non-suturing of the peritoneum was associated with shorter operation duration (p< 0.01 significant), and reduced cost.