Effects of fluvastatin treatment on lipid profile, C-reactive protein trend, and renal function in dyslipidemic patients with chronic renal failure.

The purpose of this trial was to evaluate the effects of fluvastatin on the lipid pro-file and on renal function, as measured by creatinine clearance, in dyslipidemic patients with chronic renal failure. In this 8-month prospective, open-label, randomized, parallel-group trial, 130 patients (70 men and 60 women), after a 2-month washout period following previous lipid-lowering treatments, were randomly assigned to fluvastatin XL 80 mg given once daily (80 patients) or to standard treatment (50 patients). Mean total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and triglyceride values after 3 and 6 months of treatment with fluvastatin showed statistically significant improvement compared with standard treatment. Improved renal function, as measured by creatinine clearance, was observed at the end of the 6-month treatment period in approximately 65% of patients treated with fluvastatin. The increase in creatinine clearance consistently reached 10% to 15% of baseline values. A statistically significant reduction in C-reactive protein (CRP) over baseline values was observed in approximately 75% of patients treated with fluvastatin. Furthermore, mean values of CRP for the fluvastatin standard treatment groups, respectively, were 6.78 and 10.19 at 3 months and 4.47 and 11 at 6 months. Both treatments were well tolerated. No major adverse events were noted. Results of this study suggest that fluvastatin treatment in patients with chronic renal failure is effective in improving the lipid profile, and it demonstrates good safety and tolerability. Furthermore, fluvastatin may contribute to improved nephroprotection in this patient population.

Surgery versus interventional radiology in the management of thrombosed vascular access for hemodialysis.

Thrombosis is the most frequent complication occurring in vascular access (VA). The two widely used treatment strategies for thrombosed VA are surgical and endovascular. Which is the best and whether different approaches should be used on proximal versus distal VA, is still debated. This is a retrospective study. Over a three years period, we studied among a population of 475 dialysis patients, 54 VA thromboses in 46 patients. Surgical procedure was successful in 14/17 (82%) distal artero-venous fistulas (AVF) while, in 9 proximal AVF, it led to initial success in 6 patients (66%), with a six months primary patency respectively of 93% and 84%. Radiological procedure resolved 6/10 distal AVF (initial success 60%) with primary patency of 66%, and was successful in 16/18 proximal AVF (initial success 89%) with primary patency of 81%. Taking our data all together, no differences are found between two thrombolitic (surgical and endovascular) procedures. But results were different in thrombosed proximal VA (where endovascular treatment should be preferred) versus distal ones (where surgery seems better).

Late symptomatic venous stenosis in three hemodialysis patients without previous central venous catheters.

It is well known that catheters placed in the subclavian or internal jugular veins may develop stenosis in the vein in which the catheter lies. Because the arteriovenous fistula (AVF) relies on good venous outflow, patients with ipsilateral central venous stenosis are subject to the malfunctioning of AVF. Until now, no data were published on patients showing central vein stenosis (CVS) without a previous central venous catheter (CVC) or a pacemaker. In this article, we report on 3 hemodialysis patients manifesting CVS ipslateral to AVF. None of these patients previously had undergone CVC. The stenosis observed had characteristics and symptoms similar to those observed in stenoses consequent to CVC. We concluded that CVS also may occur in subclavian or axillary veins proximal to a working AVF in hemodialysis patients who have never had a CVC and in the absence of compressive phenomena.

Plasmapheresis in severe forms of myasthenia gravis.

In this study we introduce a new combination treatment of plasma exchange (PE) and high daily doses of prednisone for severe forms of myasthenia gravis (MG). The clinical efficacy of the combined therapy has been tested in 18 patients suffering from severe forms of MG. The protocol included 5 sessions of PE, performed in a range of 15 days, 1 session every 3 days, with concurrent administration of oral prednisone (1 mg/kg of body weight), starting at the first session of PE and given daily for at least 3 months. At the end of the entire cycle of PE, almost complete recovery (more than 90% of the initial clinical score) was obtained in 8 of 18 patients while an improvement between 60 and 90% of the initial score was achieved in 9 of 18 patients. An early improvement was noted 24 h after the beginning of plasmapheresis in 11 of 18 patients. No recurrence of symptoms was reported after 36 months of follow-up for 17 patients. The administration of steroid therapy was never followed by an early exacerbation of myasthenic symptoms as reported when it is administered in the absence of concomitant PE. According to our results, we can conclude that high doses of oral prednisone therapy in simultaneous association with PE lead to successful control of severe forms of MG, significantly superior to the therapeutic strategies until now adopted and reported in literature.