The clinical significance of antibodies to human vascular endothelial cells after cardiac transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Vascular endothelial cells are primary targets for injury during both cellular and humoral allograft rejection (AR). In cardiac transplantation, the role of humoral immunity in mediating AR has not been extensively characterized. METHODS: Antibodies against human vascular endothelial cells (AECA) were measured using a cellular ELISA developed from human umbilical vein endothelial cells in 80 consecutive patients after cardiac transplantation. The aim was to determine the incidence of AECA formation after transplantation and their association with different types of AR, graft survival, and development of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV). At least eight serum samples obtained from each patient were examined for AECA and an endomyocardial biopsy was performed at regular intervals during the first year after transplantation. RESULTS: Of the 80 patients examined, 31 were AECA (+) and 49 patients were AECA (-). There were no significant differences between the AECA (+) and (-) groups when examined for age, sex, and pretransplantation ischemia time. A significant correlation was found between the presence of AECA and humoral AR (P<0.015). AECA positivity did not correlate with the presence of cellular AR or the number of rejection episodes. In addition, allograft survival at 2 years after transplantation was significantly better in the AECA (-) group compared with that in the AECA (+) group (89.8% vs. 71.0%, P<0.0004). The persistence of AECA positivity during the first year after transplantation was also associated with a significantly greater incidence of CAV when compared with the patients who were AECA (-) (25.8% vs. 14.3%, P<0.004). CONCLUSIONS: AECA may be important in the mediation of humoral AR, may decrease allograft survival, and may identify a high-risk group for CAV.

Cytomegalovirus infection induces anti-endothelial cell antibodies in cardiac and renal allograft recipients.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection represents a significant morbidity factor for transplant recipients. CMV infection has an association with the development of allograft rejection (AR) through graft endothelial cell (EC) damage, but the mechanisms are not yet clear. There are few reports addressing the role of humoral immunity in vascular EC injury mediated by CMV infection whereas many reports are available regarding the mechanism(s) of CMV-associated allograft EC injury mediated by cellular immunity. Here we examine the incidence of CMV infection in 40 cardiac and 25 renal allograft recipients using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques. We also monitored sera for the development of anti-EC antibodies (AECA) using an ELISA with human umbilical vein ECs as targets, and IL-2 levels using an ELISA. AECA levels (immunoglobulin-G and immunoglobulin-M) were significantly elevated in allograft recipients who demonstrated CMV-PCR positivity when compared with the CMV-PCR negative group (IgG: 23.1 +/- 16.4 vs 4.7 +/- 4.5, p < 0.0001; IgM: 47.0 +/- 53.6 vs 7.0 +/- 11.2, p < 0.0001). Serum AECA (IgG and IgM) levels increased one to four weeks after CMV DNA was detected and elevated AECA levels persisted for at least one to two months, and sometimes for several months. Elevated AECA levels correlated well with serum IL-2 levels. These results suggest that CMV infection is associated with an increased humoral immune response to EC antigens, which may be a risk factor for vascular rejection, chronic rejection and decreased allograft survival.

Correlation of cytomegalovirus DNA levels with response to antiviral therapy in cardiac and renal allograft recipients.

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection represents a significant morbidity factor for transplant recipients. A rapid, sensitive, specific, and reliable test is desirable for early detection of CMV infection and for monitoring the efficacy of antiviral therapy. METHODS: We examined the incidence of CMV infection in 95 cardiac and 25 renal allograft recipients followed for up to 3 years using qualitative and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques. Results were subsequently correlated with clinical findings. Of the 236 samples analyzed by the CMV PCR, 84 and 20 were also analyzed by blood buffy coat culture and anti-CMV antibody IgM assays, respectively. RESULTS: The sensitivity of the CMV PCR was found to be superior to that of the other assays, although the specificity of the blood buffy coat culture is as good as that of the CMV PCR, which is higher than that of the anti-CMV antibody IgM assay. CMV infection was detected by the CMV PCR in 17 of 95 cardiac and 9 of 25 renal transplant recipients. Clinical symptoms were observed when > or =500 copies of CMV DNA/1 microg of total DNA were detected by a quantitative CMV PCR assay using an external control CMV plasmid; however, some patients had symptoms when 50-100 copies were present. The levels of CMV DNA detected varied (50-1000 copies) in patients who developed asymptomatic CMV infection. The CMV DNA levels decreased to 50-100 copies 1-2 weeks after antiviral therapy was initiated and correlated well with disappearance of clinical symptoms. CMV DNA levels decreased to < or =5 copies at 4-7 weeks after treatment. This contrasts with patients who were unresponsive to anti-CMV therapy, in whom high levels of CMV DNA (> or =500 copies) persisted for at least 5 weeks and significant levels of CMV DNA (50-100 copies) were detected for several months afterward, despite multiple courses of anti-CMV therapy. Clinical symptoms also did not disappear during this period of observation. CONCLUSIONS: (1) The CMV PCR represents a rapid, sensitive, specific, reliable test for detection of CMV infection, especially for detection of virus replication in an incipient phase. (2) The quantitative CMV PCR is useful for monitoring the efficacy of antiviral therapy to distinguish patients who respond to therapy from those who do not. (3) CMV DNA levels > or =500 copies/1 microg of total DNA analyzed by the quantitative CMV PCR can be used to differentiate CMV infection from other infections and rejection.

Selective expression of the interleukin-2 gene discriminates between the auto- and allo-mixed lymphocyte reaction.

The in vitro mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) is a useful model to study alloresponsiveness to histocompatibility antigens. Secretion of different cytokine proteins in the supernatant of allo-MLR cultures has been reported in a few studies with no reference to results in auto-MLR. Since most cytokines are autocrine factors, their levels in the supernatant may not reflect the actual intracellular production. Therefore, we studied cytokine gene expression in auto- and allo-MLR by Northern dot blotting and reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis. mRNA for IL-beta and IL-8 was detected in both auto- and allo-MLR by Northern dot blotting. mRNA for IL-2, gamma-IFN, TNF-alpha, IL-4, IL-10 and IL-2 receptor (IL-2R) was not found by Northern dot blotting and could only be detected by RT-PCR. Expression of mRNA for IL-4, IL-10, TNF-alpha, gamma-IFN and IL-2R by RT-PCR analysis was seen in both auto- and allo-MLR. There was slightly increased expression of gamma-IFN, IL-2R and TNF-alpha in allo-MLR in comparison to auto-MLR. However, IL-2 was exclusively expressed in allo-MLR and was detected as early as 5 h of initiation of culture. These results indicate that mRNA expression for a number of cytokines can be seen in both auto- and allo-MLR using RT-PCR analysis. However, the consistent expression of IL-2 in the allo-MLR indicates that it is an important cytokine which discriminates an allo- from an autoresponse. These findings suggest that detection of IL-2 gene expression by RT-PCR may be useful for immune monitoring of allograft rejection.

Immunologic monitoring of OKT3 induction therapy in cardiac allograft recipients.

OKT3 induction therapy was monitored in 31 cardiac allograft recipients during the 1st year posttransplant. Serum level of OKT3, anti-OKT3 antibodies, and interleukin-2 (IL-2) were monitored during the first 2 months posttransplant. These values were retrospectively correlated with allograft rejection episodes which occurred during the 1st year posttransplant and allograft survival rates over a 3-year observation period. We found that OKT3 induction therapy (10-14 days) was not associated with the development of anti-OKT3 antibodies manifest by dropping OKT3 levels during OKT3 therapy, and is not associated with the development of vascular rejection in our patient population. Patients with high titer ant-OKT3 antibodies, erratic serum OKT3 levels, and/or high serum IL-2 levels (> or = 5 ng/ml) during the first 2 months posttransplant showed a higher incidence of allograft rejection (predominantly cellular rejection) during the 1st year posttransplant and showed lower allograft survival rates. We also showed that a concomitant elevation of serum IL-2 levels was found in patients who developed anti-OKT3 antibodies. CD3+ T-cell levels were not predictive of inefficacy of OKT3 therapy. We conclude that immunologic monitoring of serum OKT3, anti-OKT3 antibody, and possibly serum IL-2 levels is critical for identification of patients who develop early, OKT3-resistant rejection episodes and for the identification of patients who may be more susceptible to allograft rejection and decreased allograft survival long after completion of OKT3 therapy.

Serum cytokine levels in heart allograft recipients: correlation with findings on endomyocardial biopsy.

The ability to detect rejection of human cardiac allografts depends on endomyocardial biopsy diagnosis. Because cytokines are known to mediate allograft rejection events, we chose to examine serum levels of specific cytokines and receptors (interleukin-2 [IL-2], IL-2 receptor [IL-2R], and tumor necrosis factor alpha [TNF-alpha]) and to correlate those levels with findings on endomyocardial biopsy. Sequential sera samples from 23 cardiac allograft recipients were examined for the cytokine levels mentioned, and data correlated with findings on endomyocardial biopsy. Briefly, no statistically correlation of serum cytokine or receptor levels with the stage of allograft rejection was found. When sequential serum cytokine levels were determined in patients experiencing humoral and cellular allograft rejection events, the levels of TNF-alpha appeared to correlate well with endomyocardial biopsy findings. IL-2 and IL-2R levels in two patients who never experienced rejection were elevated on occasion, but TNF-alpha levels were always negative. In summary, measurement of serum cytokine (IL-2, IL-2R) levels in cardiac allograft recipients does not appear to correlate with findings on endomyocardial biopsy; however, elevated levels of TNF-alpha appear to predict more severe humoral allograft rejection episodes and may be helpful in this regard.