RESUMO
BACKGROUND: This study investigates whether early clozapine use is associated with improved responses in different clinical domains, including positive and negative symptoms, functioning, and well-being. METHODS: Data from 254 clozapine-treated patients at Cambridgeshire and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust (CPFT) were analysed. Among them, 231 (90.9 %) had a diagnosis of schizophrenia, 21 (8.3 %) schizoaffective disorder, and 2 (0.8 %) had other diagnoses. The International Classification of Diseases-Mortality and Morbidity Statistics criteria (ICD-10) were employed (World Health Organization, 1992). The cohort was assessed using the positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS), the Brief Negative Symptom Scale (BNSS), Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF), and the short version of Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (SWEMWBS). Logistic regression models (for positive and negative symptom remission) and linear regression (for functioning and well-being) were utilized to assess the influence of time to clozapine initiation (TCI), age at the first episode of psychosis (AFE), duration of clozapine treatment (DCT), and gender. RESULTS: Early clozapine treatment (within the first three years after the first episode of psychosis) was associated with increased negative symptom remission (exp (B) = 0.38; p = 0.02) and higher functioning scores (ß = -0.12, p = 0.046). However, no effect of time to clozapine initiation was found on positive symptom remission rates or well-being scores. CONCLUSIONS: Initiating clozapine treatment within the first 3 years of the first episode of psychosis may lead to reduced severity of negative symptoms and improved functioning in clozapine-treated patients. The time to clozapine initiation did not influence its effect on positive symptom remission rates.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: During the last few years, the continuous emergence of new psychoactive substances (NPS) has become an important public health challenge. The use of NPS has been rising in two different ways: buying and consuming NPS knowingly and the presence of NPS in traditional drugs as adulterants. The rise of NPS use is increasing the number of different substances in the market to an extent impossible to study with current scientific methodologies. This has caused a remarkable absence of necessary information about newer drug effects on people who use drugs, mental health professionals, and policy makers. Current scientific methodologies have failed to provide enough data in the timeframe when critical decisions must be made, being not only too slow but also too square. Last but not least, they dramatically lack the high resolution of phenomenological details. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to characterize a population of e-psychonauts and the subjective effects of the NPS they used during the study period using a new, internet-based, fast, and inexpensive methodology. This will allow bridging an evidence gap between online surveys, which do not provide substance confirmation, and clinical trials, which are too slow and expensive to keep up with the new substances appearing every week. METHODS: To cover this purpose, we designed a highly personalized, observational longitudinal study methodology. Participants will be recruited from online communities of people who use NPS, and they will be followed online by means of a continuous objective and qualitative evaluation lasting for at least 1 year. In addition, participants will send samples of the substances they intend to use during that period, so they can be analyzed and matched with the effects they report on the questionnaires. RESULTS: The research protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Hospital del Mar Research Institute on December 11, 2018. Data collection started in August 2019 and was still ongoing when the protocol was submitted (September 2020). The first data collection period of the study ended in October 2020. Data analysis began in November 2020, and it is still ongoing. The authors expect to submit the first results for publication by the end of 2021. A preliminary analysis was conducted when the manuscript was submitted and was reviewed after it was accepted in February 2021. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to conduct an institutional review board-approved study using this new methodology and collect the expected data. However, the meaning and usefulness of these data are still unknown. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/24433.
