Improving transfusion practice: ongoing education and audit at two tertiary speciality hospitals in Western Australia.

BACKGROUND: Institutions undertaking transfusion have a responsibility to ensure safe and appropriate practice. The hospital transfusion committee (HTC) plays a major role in monitoring all aspects of transfusion. Dedicated staff with the responsibility of undertaking transfusion education and audit have been employed at many hospitals. The question is 'Do these positions improve practice?'. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In 2005, a transfusion coordinator was employed by the King Edward Memorial Hospital (KEMH) and Princess Margaret Hospital (PMH) in Perth, Western Australia. After an initial audit to collect baseline data on transfusion documentation and compliance with national guidelines, a series of interventions was undertaken. In addition, the transfusion protocols were rewritten and published electronically. Further audits were undertaken in 2006, 2007 and 2009. RESULTS: Sequential audits show measured improvements in transfusion documentation. Baseline, hourly and completion observations are now correctly recorded in >94% of records at KEMH and >96% of records at PMH. Compliance with recording of 15 min observations has shown a 23% magnitude increase at KEMH and 36% at PMH. Compliance with recording of consent has increased by 20% at KEMH and 31% at PMH. Promotion of positive patient identification, when collecting specimens and administering blood, has been undertaken. CONCLUSION: The initiatives implemented by the transfusion coordinator and endorsed by the HTCs have improved the standard of transfusion documentation and practice at both institutions.

The development and implementation of an obstetric cell salvage service.

Cell salvage in obstetric haemorrhage is now endorsed by a number of organisations. Most of the literature has focused on isolated case series and safety. We describe how cell salvage, including a quality assurance process conducted prior to clinical implementation, was introduced to our stand-alone obstetric hospital which had no previous experience of this technique. An implementation committee was established and 25 quality assurance and familiarisation cases were initially conducted. As part of this process the alpha fetoprotein, haematocrit, free plasma haemoglobin, potassium and Kleihauer tests were performed when enough blood was available for processing. Our guidelines for clinical use included women at greatly increased risk of obstetric haemorrhage and women at increased risk of haemorrhage who refused traditional transfusion. After the successful completion of this process, cell salvage was signed off for clinical use in March 2007 and was used on 51 occasions between March 2007 and July 2009. Twenty-one patients had salvaged blood re-transfused and for seven patients this was their only red blood cell replacement. The median blood loss in patients re-transfused was 3000 ml (range <500 to 8500 ml), with the median volume re-transfused 359 mi (range 60 to 1300 ml). There was one episode of unexplained hypotension associated with administration of salvaged blood. We have successfully introduced obstetric cell salvage into clinical practice. A quality assurance process prior to implementation was beneficial for the staff involved. Despite targeting a high-risk obstetric population, our re-transfusion rates are approximately 40%. No serious adverse events have been recorded. We recommend that in units that already provide intraoperative cell salvage in a non-obstetric setting, extending the service into obstetric situations should be considered. Units that routinely care for high-risk obstetric patients should also consider the introduction of such a service. Post transfusion Kleihauer testing should be performed as soon as possible in Rhesus-negative mothers who deliver a Rhesus-positive foetus, so that appropriate anti-D prophylaxis can be administered.