Anastomosis configuration and technique following ileocaecal resection for Crohn's disease: a multicentre study.

A limited ileocaecal resection is the most frequently performed procedure for ileocaecal CD and different anastomotic configurations and techniques have been described. This manuscript audited the different anastomotic techniques used in a national study and evaluated their influence on postoperative outcomes following ileocaecal resection for primary CD. This is a retrospective, multicentre, observational study promoted by the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR), including all adults undergoing elective ileocaecal resection for primary CD from June 2018 May 2019. Postoperative morbidity within 30 days of surgery was the primary endpoint. Postoperative length of hospital stay (LOS) and anastomotic leak rate were the secondary outcomes. 427 patients were included. The side to side anastomosis was the chosen configuration in 380 patients (89%). The stapled anastomotic (n = 286; 67%), techniques were preferred to hand-sewn (n = 141; 33%). Postoperative morbidity was 20.3% and anastomotic leak 3.7%. Anastomotic leak was independent of the type of anastomosis performed, while was associated with an ASA grade ≥ 3, presence of perianal disease and ileocolonic localization of disease. Four predictors of LOS were identified after multivariate analysis. The laparoscopic approach was the only associated with a reduced LOS (p = 0.017), while age, ASA grade ≥ 3 or administration of preoperative TPN were associated with increased LOS. The side to side was the most commonly used anastomotic configuration for ileocolic reconstruction following primary CD resection. There was no difference in postoperative morbidity according to anastomotic technique and configuration. Anastomotic leak was associated with ASA grade ≥ 3, a penetrating phenotype of disease and ileo-colonic distribution of CD.

[Two-stage laparoscopic management of complicated acute diverticulitis. Initial experience]. / Trattamento laparoscopico in due tempi della diverticolite acuta complicata. Esperienza iniziale.

Today no secure consensus exists about the best treatment of complicated diverticulitis. The classic surgical procedures are associated to a high immediate and delayed morbidity. In the last few years several more conservative techniques have been suggested to allow a later elective resection. Laparoscopic exploration, peritoneal lavage, and drain of the abdominal cavity followed by an elective sigmoid laparoscopic resection is a new minimal invasive approach. This approach has been applied in our unit to treat four patients. All patients had an acute abdomen due to complicated diverticulitis and one patient had evidence of free air at the abdomen x-ray. At emergent operation pus was cleaned, a peritoneal lavage was carried out, a drain was placed near the colonic lesion and another one in the pelvis. Patients fully recovered without complication and 2 to 28 weeks after first operation an elective laparoscopic resection of descending and sigmoid colon with a Knight-Griffen colorectal anastomosis was performed. Neither residual abscess nor dense adhesions were found at the second operations. There were no complications and median hospital stay after the second operation was 10 days (range, 8-13 days). Laparoscopic treatment of generalized peritonitis due to perforated diverticulitis is an attractive alternative to the traditional management of this disease. Our initial results are comparable to that published in the literature. This approach can be safe and effective in selected cases of complicated acute diverticulitis.

Can armrests improve comfort and task performance in laparoscopic surgery?

OBJECTIVE: The study sought to determine whether the support provided by armrests influenced task quality, task efficiency, and surgeon comfort during laparoscopic surgery. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Complex laparoscopic surgery requires precise movements, and usually long execution times and an uncomfortable stance. Discomfort in the shoulders, back, and neck is an established complaint among laparoscopic surgeons and is related to the unnatural postures adopted during laparoscopic interventions. Discomfort, and the associated fatigue, is a contributory factor in the execution of errors. METHODS: Nineteen subjects completed a bimanual simulated laparoscopic task both with and without the aid of bilateral armrests. The task was completed in both an ideal unstressed posture and an uncomfortable, stressed elevated posture that more closely represents real laparoscopic operating conditions. Task duration was prolonged sufficiently to precipitate muscular fatigue. The participants also completed a visual analogue scale instrument on level of discomfort symptoms experienced in every part of the upper limbs and vertebral spine. Execution errors (task quality) and completion times (task efficiency) were recorded automatically by the laparoscopic simulator. RESULTS: Error rates and discomfort measures were significantly improved when the armrests were used, but there was no significant change in task completion time. CONCLUSIONS: The use of armrests in simulated laparoscopic surgery brings measurable comfort and task performance benefits, which could transfer to actual surgical procedures.