Short-term outcomes of chemoradiotherapy and local excision versus total mesorectal excision in T2-T3ab,N0,M0 rectal cancer: a multicentre randomised, controlled, phase III trial (the TAU-TEM study).

BACKGROUND: The standard treatment of T2-T3ab,N0,M0 rectal cancers is total mesorectal excision (TME) due to the high recurrence rates recorded with local excision. Initial reports of the combination of pre-operative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) have shown reductions in local recurrence. The TAU-TEM study aims to demonstrate the non-inferiority of local recurrence and the improvement in morbidity achieved with CRT-TEM compared with TME. Here we describe morbidity rates and pathological outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial including patients with rectal adenocarcinoma staged as T2-T3ab,N0,M0. Patients were randomised to the CRT-TEM or the TME group. Patients included, tolerance of CRT and its adverse effects, surgical complications (Clavien-Dindo and Comprehensive Complication Index classifications) and pathological results (complete response in the CRT-TEM group) were recorded in both groups. Patients attended follow-up controls for local and systemic relapse. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01308190. RESULTS: From July 2010 to October 2021, 173 patients from 17 Spanish hospitals were included (CRT-TEM: 86, TME: 87). Eleven were excluded after randomisation (CRT-TEM: 5, TME: 6). Modified intention-to-treat analysis thus included 81 patients in each group. There was no mortality after CRT. In the CRT-TEM group, one patient abandoned CRT, 1/81 (1.2%). The CRT-related morbidity rate was 29.6% (24/81). Post-operative morbidity was 17/82 (20.7%) in the CRT-TEM group and 41/81 (50.6%) in the TME group (P < 0.001, 95% confidence interval 42.9% to 16.7%). One patient died in each group (1.2%). Of the 81 patients in the CRT-TEM group who received the allocated treatment, 67 (82.7%) underwent organ preservation. Pathological complete response in the CRT-TEM group was 44.3% (35/79). In the TME group, pN1 were found in 17/81 (21%). CONCLUSION: CRT-TEM treatment obtains high pathological complete response rates (44.3%) and a high CRT compliance rate (98.8%). Post-operative complications and hospitalisation rates were significantly lower than those in the TME group. We await the results of the follow-up regarding cancer outcomes and quality of life.

Role of circulating tumor cells as prognostic marker in resected stage III colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic role of circulating tumor cells (CTC) in early colorectal cancer (CRC) has not been determined yet. We evaluated the potential prognostic value of CTC in stage III CRC patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective multicenter study of 519 patients with stage III CRC recruited between January 2009 and June 2010. CTC were enumerated with the CellSearch System after primary tumor resection and before the start of adjuvant therapy. A total of 472 patients were included in the analysis. RESULTS: CTC ≥1, ≥2, ≥3 and ≥5 were detected in 166 (35%), 93 (20%), 57 (12%) and 34 (7%) patients, respectively. Median follow-up was 40 months. In the overall population, CTC ≥1 (disease-free survival (DFS): HR 0.97, P = 0.85; overall survival (OS): HR 1.03, P = 0.89), ≥2 (DFS: HR 1.07, P = 0.76; OS: HR 1.02, P = 0.95), ≥3 (DFS: HR 0.96, P = 0.87; OS: HR 0.74, P = 0.41) and ≥5 (DFS: HR 0.72, P = 0.39; OS: HR 0.48, P = 0.21) were not associated with worse DFS and OS. No clinicopathological characteristics were significantly associated with the presence of CTC. In patients with disease relapse, the proportion with CTC ≥1 was not significantly different between those with single versus multiple metastatic locations (37.9% versus 31.4%, P = 0.761). In the multivariate analysis, CTC ≥1 was not an independent prognostic factor for DFS (HR 0.97, P = 0.87) and OS (HR 0.96, P = 0.89). CONCLUSION: CTC detection was not associated with worse DFS and OS in patients with stage III CRC. Given the scarcity of CTC in these patients, it is likely that CTC determined by CellSearch system does not have a prognostic role in this setting. However, a longer follow-up is needed.

Pharmacogenetic predictors of severe peripheral neuropathy in colon cancer patients treated with oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy: a GEMCAD group study.

BACKGROUND: Oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (CT), widely used as adjuvant therapy for stage III and selected high-risk stage II colon cancer (CC) patients, is often associated with cumulative peripheral neuropathy. Our aim is to identify single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes involved in oxaliplatin metabolism, DNA repair mechanisms, cell cycle control, detoxification or excretion pathways to predict severe (grade 2-3) oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy (OXPN) among CC patients treated with oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidine-based adjuvant CT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Genomic DNA was extracted from formalin-fixed-paraffin-embedded peritumoral samples from 206 high-risk stage II and stage III CC patients receiving oxaliplatin-based adjuvant CT from January 2004 to December 2009. Genotyping was carried out for 34 SNPs in 15 genes using MassARRAY (SEQUENOM) technology. A total of 181 stage II-III CC patients treated with the same CT regimens were enrolled as a validation set. RESULTS: The rs2230641 cyclin H (CCNH) rs2230641 C/C [odd ratio (OR)=5.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.061-2.41, P=0.042] and the ATP-binding cassette subfamily G, member 2 (ABCG2) rs3114018 A/A genotypes (OR=2.67; 95% CI 0.95-4.41; P=0.059) were associated with a higher risk of severe OXPN. In addition, patients harboring the combination of CCNH C/C and/or the ABCG2 rs3114018 A/A genotypes had a higher risk of grade 2-3 OXPN than those with the CCNH any T and ABCG2 any C genotypes (37.73% versus 19.42%; OR=2.46; 95% CI 1.19-5.07; P=0.014) in the logistic regression analysis using age, gender, adjuvant CT regimen and cumulative dose of oxaliplatin as covariates. The ability to predict severe OXPN of this combined analysis was independently validated in the second cohort (58% versus 33.33%; OR=2.99; 95% CI 1.45-6.13; P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that SNPs in CCNH and ABCG2 can modulate the development of severe OXPN among stage II-III CC patients who received oxaliplatin-based CT, thus enabling the individualization of adjuvant treatment.

SEOM clinical guidelines for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is the first cause of cancer diagnosis in Spain. Over half of the patients are diagnosed with or will eventually develop distant metastasis. The current manuscript aims to provide synthetic practical guidelines for the therapeutic approaches in advanced disease. Available systemic therapeutic options, and integration and sequencing of chemotherapy with surgical procedures are discussed. Extent of disease, treatment objective, tumor kras mutation status, as well as patient's functional and comorbid conditions shall be considered to properly design the most adequate therapeutic strategy (AU)

Feasibility of adequate resectable rectal cancer treatment in a third-level hospital.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility, concerning compliance to protocol and recommended clinical practice guidelines, as well as efficacy results of multidisciplinary treatment (surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy) of resectable rectal cancer in a third-level hospital devoid of radiotherapy and clinical oncology units. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective, single-institution analysis was completed for 45 consecutive patients diagnosed with resectable rectal cancer who entered an officially proposed multidisciplinary treatment protocol from October 1998 to September 2003. Adequacy of patient inclusion, according to clinical stage, was reviewed. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy schedule, surgery procedures and adjuvant chemotherapy indication were assessed. All treatment time intervals were analysed. Finally, efficacy results are discussed and contextualised by comparison with results of clinical trials which support this treatment strategy. RESULTS: According to an independent board review, 3 patients (6.7%) with stage I rectal cancer, 31 patients (68.9%) with stage II and 11 patients (24.4%) with stage III rectal cancer were included. Radiotherapy dosage, volume and schedule were as planned. Median time from diagnosis to start of radiotherapy was 26.36 days (24.26- 28.57; CI 95%). Median duration of radiotherapy was 6.00 days (5.56-6.44; CI 95%). Median time from start of radiotherapy to surgery was 15.67 days (14.47-16.87; CI 95%). Median time from completion of radiotherapy to surgery was 10.67 days (9.53-11.81; CI 95%). Most of the patients underwent low anterior resection [23 patients (51.2%)] and abdominoperineal resection [16 patients (35.6%)]. Correlation between clinical and pathologic staging was as expected. Twenty-nine patients (64.4%) of the 45 that were initially included started adjuvant chemotherapy. A statistically significant relationship between pathologic stage (grouped I-II vs. III) and the use of adjuvant chemotherapy was found (p=0.033; chi-square test). Radiotherapy- and chemotherapy-induced toxicity did not differ from that previously reported. With a median follow-up of 65.46 months, a total of 10 recurrences have been diagnosed, all of them in stage III patients. Overall survival rate at five years was 76% for the complete population included. CONCLUSION: Multidisciplinary treatment of resectable rectal cancer in a third-level hospital is feasible. Although efficacy results are comparable to those previously reported in the literature, further improvements in clinical staging as well as in adjuvant chemotherapy indication are desirable.

Feasibility of adequate resectable rectal cancer treatment in a third-level hospital

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility, concerning compliance to protocol and recommended clinical practice guidelines, as well as efficacy results of multidisciplinary treatment (surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy) of resectable rectal cancer in a third-level hospital devoid of radiotherapy and clinical oncology units. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective, single-institution analysis was completed for 45 consecutive patients diagnosed with resectable rectal cancer who entered an officially proposed multidisciplinary treatment protocol from October 1998 to September 2003. Adequacy of patient inclusion, according to clinical stage, was reviewed. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy schedule, surgery procedures and adjuvant chemotherapy indication were assessed. All treatment time intervals were analysed. Finally, efficacy results are discussed and contextualised by comparison with results of clinical trials which support this treatment strategy. RESULTS: According to an independent board review, 3 patients (6.7%) with stage I rectal cancer, 31 patients (68.9%) with stage II and 11 patients (24.4%) with stage III rectal cancer were included. Radiotherapy dosage, volume and schedule were as planned. Median time from diagnosis to start of radiotherapy was 26.36 days (24.26- 28.57; CI 95%). Median duration of radiotherapy was 6.00 days (5.56-6.44; CI 95%). Median time from start of radiotherapy to surgery was 15.67 days (14.47-16.87; CI 95%). Median time from completion of radiotherapy to surgery was 10.67 days (9.53-11.81; CI 95%). Most of the patients underwent low anterior resection [23 patients (51.2%)] and abdominoperineal resection [16 patients (35.6%)]. Correlation between clinical and pathologic staging was as expected. Twenty-nine patients (64.4%) of the 45 that were initially included started adjuvant chemotherapy. A statistically significant relationship between pathologic stage (grouped I-II vs. III) and the use of adjuvant chemotherapy was found (p=0.033; chi-square test). Radiotherapy- and chemotherapy-induced toxicity did not differ from that previously reported. With a median follow-up of 65.46 months, a total of 10 recurrences have been diagnosed, all of them in stage III patients. Overall survival rate at five years was 76% for the complete population included. CONCLUSION: Multidisciplinary treatment of resectable rectal cancer in a third-level hospital is feasible. Although efficacy results are comparable to those previously reported in the literature, further improvements in clinical staging as well as in adjuvant chemotherapy indication are desirable (AU)

No disponible

Towards an optimal treatment strategy for patients with oesophageal cancer

No disponible

No disponible

Anemia hemolítica en una paciente en tratamiento con capecitabina. Descripción de un caso y revisión de la literatura / Patient with haemolytic anemia and treatment with capecitabine. Review of one case and literature

No disponible

Endocarditis sobre válvula pulmonar nativa por Enterococcus faecalis / Endocarditis over pulmonary valve by Enterococcus faecalis

No disponible