Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed ; 103(2): F152-F156, 2018 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28663282

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess ampicillin levels according to the duration of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP). DESIGN: Prospective cohort single-centre study. SETTING: Tertiary care centre (Modena, Italy). PATIENTS: 120 neonates≥35 weeks' gestation exposed to IAP. INTERVENTIONS: Neonates were divided into four groups, according to the duration of IAP prior to delivery: group 1 (n=30; <1 hour), group 2 (n=30; ≥1 and <2 hours), group 3 (n=30; ≥2 and <4 hours) and group 4 (n=30; ≥2 doses, ≥4 hours). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Blood samples were collected at delivery (from the umbilical cord) and at age 4 hours (from a peripheral vessel). RESULTS: Median duration of IAP was 121 min (range 7-2045 min). Median ampicillin levels in umbilical cord blood were 10.4 µg/mL (IQR 6.4-14.9) and in peripheral blood were 4.7 µg/mL (IQR 2.8-6.4µg/mL). Umbilical cord blood levels reached a peak approximately 30 min after IAP and then declined significantly (p<0.001). Peripheral blood levels did not differ among study groups. Neonates exposed to a full loading dose (n=115) had peripheral blood levels 2.5-70 times higher than the minimal inhibitory concentration for group B streptococcus. There was no relationship between neonatal ampicillin concentrations and the duration of IAP prior to delivery (ß=-0.0003, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.001, p=0.680). CONCLUSIONS: Ampicillin levels reach a peak in the umbilical cord blood within 30 min of intrapartum administration. After a full loading dose, bactericidal levels persist for at least 4 hours after birth and seem independent of the duration of IAP prior to delivery.


Assuntos
Ampicilina/administração & dosagem , Ampicilina/farmacocinética , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Antibioticoprofilaxia/métodos , Infecções Estreptocócicas/prevenção & controle , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Sangue Fetal/química , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Itália , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Gravidez , Estudos Prospectivos , Streptococcus agalactiae , Vagina/microbiologia
2.
J Headache Pain ; 10(4): 235-9, 2009 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19495934

RESUMO

There are a large number of drugs inducing headache as an adverse reaction. Nevertheless, headaches as adverse reactions to drugs have received limited attention. Non-serious adverse reactions, such as headache, are not quantified and described as accurately as serious, life threatening ones. However, non-serious reactions can also be extremely troublesome, above all when they are chronic: they can affect patients' quality of life and contribute to non-compliance. It is absolutely possible that the number of patients with headache as an adverse reaction, which is going to increase, considering the growing use of medications. Physicians should, therefore, be aware of this issue. Indeed, it is difficult to attribute the diagnosis of adverse drug reaction to a condition, headache, which is also a very common symptom in general population.


Assuntos
Sistemas de Notificação de Reações Adversas a Medicamentos/tendências , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/fisiopatologia , Transtornos da Cefaleia/induzido quimicamente , Transtornos da Cefaleia/fisiopatologia , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/normas , Cefaleia Histamínica/induzido quimicamente , Cefaleia Histamínica/fisiopatologia , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Interações Medicamentosas/fisiologia , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/diagnóstico , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/epidemiologia , Transtornos da Cefaleia/classificação , Humanos , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/induzido quimicamente , Transtornos de Enxaqueca/fisiopatologia , Cefaleia do Tipo Tensional/induzido quimicamente , Cefaleia do Tipo Tensional/fisiopatologia
3.
J Clin Lab Anal ; 20(6): 239-44, 2006.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17115421

RESUMO

Sirolimus is a immunosuppressive agent for renal transplant recipients. Monitoring of whole blood sirolimus concentration is necessary in order to improve clinical outcomes. An increasing number of clinical laboratories (4-14% during 2005) are using microparticle enzyme immunoassay (MEIA) for sirolimus quantitation but previous reports indicated a high variability, with a mean difference of 17% for MEIA method vs. high-performance liquid chromatography/ultraviolet (HPLC/UV). This study was aimed at comparing the reliability of MEIA with the HPLC/UV method. Blood samples from transplant patients were processed using both HPLC/UV and MEIA assays. Comparison and Bland-Altman plots, as well as regression analysis and paired t-test were used to compare results of the assays. Concentrations were stratified into three groups and used to investigate whether any observed difference between methods could be influenced by sirolimus concentration. Regression analysis yielded a coefficient of correlation R of 0.9756, the line of best fit being y=0.9832x+0.1976. The statistical analysis showed no difference between the two sets of experimental data. The average percentage difference between the two methods was found to be -0.2+/-19.2%. On the basis of our present results, the tested MEIA assay is able to quantify sirolimus concentration with a clinically acceptable imprecision, similar to that of HPLC/UV method.


Assuntos
Imunossupressores/sangue , Sirolimo/sangue , Análise Química do Sangue/métodos , Análise Química do Sangue/estatística & dados numéricos , Cromatografia Líquida de Alta Pressão/métodos , Cromatografia Líquida de Alta Pressão/estatística & dados numéricos , Monitoramento de Medicamentos , Humanos , Técnicas Imunoenzimáticas/métodos , Técnicas Imunoenzimáticas/estatística & dados numéricos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Imunologia de Transplantes , Raios Ultravioleta
4.
Pharmacol Res ; 54(2): 142-9, 2006 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16697657

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The combination of indomethacin, prochlorperazine and caffeine (IPC) is one of the most utilized formulations for the treatment of migraine attacks in Italy. Several patients suffering from chronic headache overuse this symptomatic medication in the attempt to control their headache. OBJECTIVE: To verify whether overuse of IPC combination by chronic headache patients is associated with modified disposition of its components. METHODS: We studied indomethacin, prochlorperazine, and caffeine disposition in 34 female subjects suffering from primary headaches, subdivided into four groups: eight migraine patients occasionally using IPC combination suppositories-group 1; nine patients with chronic headache and probable medication-overuse headache, daily taking one or more suppositories of the IPC combination-group 2; 11 migraine patients occasionally using "mild" suppositories of the IPC combination-group 3; six migraine patients occasionally taking tablets of the IPC combination-group 4. The IPC combination habitually used was administered to each patient. Blood samples were taken at baseline and at fixed intervals up to 6h after administration. Plasma levels of indomethacin and prochlorperazine were assayed by high-pressure liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method; caffeine levels were assayed by enzyme multiplied immunoassay test (EMIT). Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by means of a computer software (P K Solutions 2.0. Summit Research Services, Montrose, CO, USA). RESULTS: Half-life of indomethacin was longer, and clearance lower, in group 2 than in the other groups; AUC of indomethacin in group 2 was twice that in group 1 (P<0.05, Newman-Keuls' test). Peak concentrations and AUC(0-->infinity) of caffeine were significantly higher in group 2 than in the other groups (P<0.05, Newman-Keuls' test). We could not define prochlorperazine disposition because it was not detectable in the majority of blood samples. CONCLUSION: Overuse of IPC combination in chronic headache patients is associated with increased plasma levels of indomethacin and caffeine, and with delayed elimination of indomethacin; the high and sustained concentrations of these drugs may cause rebound headache, organ damages, and perpetuate medication-overuse headache.


Assuntos
Cafeína/uso terapêutico , Transtornos da Cefaleia Secundários/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos da Cefaleia/tratamento farmacológico , Indometacina/uso terapêutico , Proclorperazina/uso terapêutico , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/farmacocinética , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Antipsicóticos/farmacocinética , Antipsicóticos/uso terapêutico , Área Sob a Curva , Cafeína/farmacocinética , Estimulantes do Sistema Nervoso Central/farmacocinética , Estimulantes do Sistema Nervoso Central/uso terapêutico , Doença Crônica , Combinação de Medicamentos , Feminino , Meia-Vida , Transtornos da Cefaleia/sangue , Transtornos da Cefaleia/induzido quimicamente , Transtornos da Cefaleia/fisiopatologia , Transtornos da Cefaleia Secundários/sangue , Transtornos da Cefaleia Secundários/induzido quimicamente , Transtornos da Cefaleia Secundários/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Indometacina/farmacocinética , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Proclorperazina/farmacocinética , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...