Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS): new treatment for early rectal cancer and large rectal polyps­experience of an Italian center.

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is a minimally invasive technique for excision of rectal tumors that avoids conventional pelvic resectional surgery along with its risks and side effects. Although appealing, the associated cost and complex learning curve limit TEM use by colorectal surgeons. Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) has emerged as an alternative to TEM. This platform uses ordinary laparoscopic instruments to achieve high-quality local excision. The aim of the study is to assess reliability of the technique. From July 2012 to August 2013, 15 consecutive patients with rectal pathology underwent TAMIS. After a single-incision laparoscopic surgery port was introduced into the anal canal, a pneumorectum was established with a laparoscopic device followed by transanal excision with conventional laparoscopic instruments, including graspers, electrocautery, and needle drivers. Patient demographics, operative data, and pathologic data were recorded. Of the 15 patients, 10 had rectal cancers (six T1 lesions and four T2 after preoperative chemoradiotherapy). The remainder of patients had a local excision for voluminous benign rectal adenomas. The median length of the lesions from the anal verge was 7 cm (range, 4 to 20 cm). The median operating time was 86 minutes (range, 33 to 160 minutes). There was no surgical morbidity or mortality. The median postoperative hospital stay was two days (range, 1 to 4 days). TAMIS seems to be a feasible and safe treatment option for early rectal cancer. We believe that this new technique is easy to perform, cost-effective, and less traumatic to the anal sphincter compared with traditional TEM.

Screening for poor performance of lower extremity in primary care: the Camucia Project.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Individuals with poor lower extremity performance are prime candidates for disability prevention. The Camucia Project is a collaborative study between geriatricians and primary care physicians (PCPs) testing the hypothesis that PCPs can use a simple performance-based test to identify older persons with poor lower extremity function, without excessive interference with their clinical routine. We also hypothesized that the number needed to screen (NNTS) a positive case would be lower in physicians' clinics than in the general population. METHODS: 23 PCPs administered the short physical performance battery (SPPB) to 360 consecutive, non-disabled and non-demented, 70- to 79-year-old outpatients. PCPs were asked to: 1) evaluate the feasibility and usefulness of administering the SPPB; 2) ascertain selected diseases according to predefined criteria; 3) identify causes of poor lower extremity function in patients with a SPPB score < or =9. NNTS from this study were compared with those estimated in non-disabled and non-demented, 70- to 79-year-old persons randomly selected from the InCHIANTI study population. RESULTS: The majority of PCPs (20/23) reported that using the SPPB to evaluate older patients was feasible and useful. The NNTS in the outpatient clinics was lower than in the InCHIANTI participants (1.6 vs 4.3). Poor lower extremity performance was attributed to musculo-skeletal diseases in 75%, to more than one cause in 55% (128/234), and to no specific cause in 16.2% (37/234) of the participants with SPPB < or =9. CONCLUSIONS: Screening of older persons with poor lower extremity perfomance by PCPs is feasible and efficient.