Early experience with universal SARS-CoV-2 testing in a New York-based reproductive endocrinology practice.

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic peak around March 2020 led to temporary closures of most fertility clinics. Many clinics reopened but required universal SARS-CoV-2 screening. However, the rate of positive results and the necessity for such testing is unknown. We report here on early results from asingle-center academic NewYork fertility practice utilizing universal SARS-CoV-2 screening. This mixed prospective retrospective cohort included 164 patients who underwent at least one SARS-CoV-2 screening test for fertility treatment between May and July2020. Patients completed 1 to 3 nasopharyngeal SARS-CoV-2 tests per cycle and remained symptom-free to continue fertility treatments. SARS-CoV-2 test results, past results, history of Covid-19 infection, and patient/cycle characteristics were recorded and tabulated through October2020. Outcomes included positive SARS-CoV-2 RNA tests, rate of prior Covid-19 infections, and clinical courses of patients testing positive. Patients underwent 263 cycles entailing 460 total SARS-CoV-2 screening tests. Fifteen patients reported astrong prior clinical history of Covid-19. Six patients experienced apositive SARS-CoV-2 test (2.3% of all cycles). Among 77 cycles (n = 58 patients) entailing one SARS-CoV-2 test, 2 cases (2.6%) were noted. Among 173 cycles (n = 121 patients) entailing two SARS-CoV-2 tests, 4 cycles (2.3%) were noted. Zero (0%) of 13 cycles (n = 13 patients) entailing 3 SARS-CoV-2 tests were positive. All patients were cleared to resume treatment within one month. Overall, anew asymptomatic infection was identified in 2 cycles (0.8%), while 4 of the 6 positive SARS-CoV-2 tests were among patients with aprior history of Covid-19. 3 of 4 also had adocumented prior positive RNA test. Our data suggest that universal SARS-CoV-2 screening among fertility patients is feasible, with an approximately 2% positive rate per cycle among the patients of this study. Most positive patients had aprior remote infection, but their infectiousness while being screened remains unclear.Abbreviations: REI: reproductive endocrinology and infertility; IUI: intrauterine insemination; IVF: in vitro fertilization; sono: sonography; cryo: cryopreservation; FET: frozen embryo transfer.

Differential impact of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation on live birth rate in fresh versus frozen embryo transfer cycles: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome System study.

OBJECTIVE: To study the impact of both controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) length and total gonadotropin (GN) dose individually and in concert on live birth rates (LBR) in both fresh and freeze-all in vitro fertilization embryo transfer (IVF-ET) cycles. DESIGN: Historical cohort study. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): The U.S. national database from the Society of Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System from 2014 to 2015 was used to identify patients undergoing autologous GN stimulation IVF cycles with the use of GnRH antagonist-based suppression protocols where a single embryo transfer was performed as part of a fresh IVF-ET cycle (fresh, n = 14,866) or the first frozen embryo transfer after a freeze-all cycle (frozen, n = 2,964), and not including preimplantation genetic testing cycles. The patients' demographic and cycle characteristics, duration of COH, total GN dose, and pregnancy outcomes were extracted. Binomial regression models estimated trend and relative risk of live birth with respect to days of stimulation and total GN dose singularly, and after adjustment for a priori confounders including age, parity, body mass index, diagnosis, and maximum follicle-stimulating hormone in both fresh and frozen embryo transfer cycles. Both days of stimulation and total GN dose were then added to the multivariate model to show whether they were independently associated with LBR. INTERVENTION(S): Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Live birth rate. RESULTS: In both fresh and frozen cycles, length of COH was significantly associated with total GN dose. On univariate analysis, LBR decreased significantly with increasing length of stimulation and increasing total GN dose in both fresh and frozen cycles. On multivariable analysis including both days of stimulation and total GN dose, days of stimulation was no longer significantly correlated with LBR, whereas total GN dose remained significantly correlated with LBR in fresh cycles only. When total GN doses ranging from <2,000 IU through 5,000 IU to >5,000 IU were compared, a significant improvement in live birth rate was noted with lower total GN doses. Specifically, GN doses <2,000 IU had a 27% higher rate of live birth compared with GN dose >5,000 IU. For GN dose groups up to 4,000 IU, the estimated effect on LBR was similar. There was a marginal improvement (13%) in LBR with GN doses of 4,000 IU to 5,000 IU compared with >5,000 IU. When the multivariate model was applied to the frozen cycles, neither total GN dose nor days of stimulation was significantly associated with LBR. CONCLUSIONS: High total GN dose but not prolonged COH is associated with decreasing LBRs in fresh cycles, whereas neither factor significantly affects LBR in frozen cycles. Consideration should be given to minimizing the total GN dose when possible in fresh autologous cycles, either by decreasing the daily dose or by limiting the length of stimulation to improve LBRs. In freeze-all cycles, the use of higher GN doses does not seem to adversely affect the LBR of the first frozen embryo transfer. High total GN dose likely exerts a negative impact on the endometrium and/or oocyte/embryo unrelated to the length of stimulation. The differential effect of total GN dose on LBR in fresh and frozen cycles may imply a greater impact exerted on the endometrium rather than the oocyte.

Length of ovarian stimulation does not impact live birth rate in fresh donor oocyte cycles: a SART CORS study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation length and total gonadotropin (GN) dose on recipient live birth rate (LBR) in fresh donor oocyte cycles. METHODS: Data was obtained from SART CORS on all fresh donor oocyte GnRH antagonist cycles (n = 1049) between 2014 and 2015 which resulted in a single embryo transferred. Donor and recipient demographic information and cycle characteristics were extracted. Binomial regression was used to estimate LBR with respect to days of stimulation (DOS) and total GN dose. Multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate these relationships after controlling for confounders. RESULTS: Overall LBR in fresh donor oocyte cycles was 57%. Average stimulation length was 14.3 ± 4.9 days, and total GN dose was 2464 ± 1062 IU. On univariate analysis, neither days of stimulation (p = 0.5) nor total GN dose (p = 0.57) was independently correlated with LBR. However, in prolonged stimulations (> 15 days) with high total GN dose (> 3000 IU), as both the cycle length and total GN dose increased, LBR significantly decreased from 63.81 to 48.15% (p = 0.02) and from 67.61 to 48.15% (p = 0.01), respectively. Multivariate analysis showed no significant effect of either DOS or total GN dose on LBR. CONCLUSIONS: LBR is significantly decreased in fresh donor oocyte cycles when cycles are prolonged with high total GN dose. However, after controlling for confounders neither DOS nor total GN dose significantly affects LBR.