RESUMO
In recent years, the application of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) as antibacterial compounds has been widely used in human and veterinary medicine. In this work, we investigated the effects of AgNPs (Argovit-4®) as feed additives (feed-AgNPs) on shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) using three different methods: 1) chronic toxicity after 28 days of feeding, 2) Effects against white spot syndrome virus (WSSV) challenged by oral route, and 3) transcriptional responses of immune-related genes (PAP, ProPO, CTL-3, Crustin, PEN3, and PEN4) following WSSV infection. The results showed that the feed-AgNPs did not interfere with the growth and survival of shrimp. Also, mild lesions in the hepatopancreas were recorded, proportional to the frequency of the feed-AgNP supply. Challenge test versus WSSV showed that feeding every 7 days with feed-AgNPs reduced mortality, reaching a survival rate of 53%, compared to the survival rates observed in groups fed every 4 days, daily and control groups of feed-AgNPs for the 30%, 10%, and 7% groups, respectively. Feed-AgNPs negatively regulated the expression of PAP, ProPO, and Crustin genes after 28 days of treatment and altered the transcriptional responses of PAP, ProPO, CTL-3, and Crustin after WSSV exposure. The results showed that weekly feeding-AgNPs could partially prevent WSSV infection in shrimp culture. However, whether or not transcriptional responses against pathogens are advantageous remains to be elucidated.
Assuntos
Nanopartículas Metálicas , Penaeidae , Vírus da Síndrome da Mancha Branca 1 , Animais , Humanos , Vírus da Síndrome da Mancha Branca 1/genética , Prata/toxicidade , Nanopartículas Metálicas/toxicidade , Imunidade , Penaeidae/genéticaRESUMO
Abstract Background: Shrimp farming is evolving from semi-intensive to hyper-intensive systems with biofloc technology and water recirculation systems. Objective: To evaluate the transcriptional response promoted by biofloc on shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) under a recirculating aquaculture system (RAS). Methods: Quantitative real-time RT-PCR was used to monitor seven key genes related to the immune system in shrimp post-larvae, reared in a RAS with and without biofloc (BF and no- BF). In addition, we present for the first time nucleotide sequences of ADP-ribosylation factor 4 (LvArf4) from Litopenaeus vannamei. Results: Transcripts for penaeidin3 (Pen3), penaeidin4 (Pen4), crustin, and Toll receptor (LvToll) genes were up-regulated between 3 and 24 h in both systems, and tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 6 (TRAF6) in no-BF as an early response. Regarding differential expression between treatments, 13 occurrences were encountered. Nine that were higher in BF than in no-BF and four higher in no-BF than in BF. In some sample times, expression of Pen3, crustin, LvToll, TRAF6, IMD, and LvArf4 was higher in BF than in no-BF and in others, expression of Pen3, Pen4, and TRAF6 was higher in no-BF than in BF. Conclusions: BF modulates the transcription of genes related to the immune response in shrimp as an early response. However, the RAS with no-BF promotes a similar response.
Resumen Antecedentes: Los cultivos de camarón están evolucionando de sistemas semi-intensivos a hiper-intensivos con biofloc y con recirculación. Objetivo: Evaluar la respuesta transcripcional promovida por el biofloc en un sistema acuícola con recirculación (SAR). Métodos: Monitoreamos mediante RT-PCR cuantitativo siete genes relacionados con el sistema inmune en postlarvas de camarón cultivadas en un SAR con y sin biofloc (BF y no-BF). Además, presentamos por primera vez la secuencia de nucleótidos del factor de ribosilación 4 de ADP (LvArf4) de Litopenaeus vannamei. Resultados: Los genes penaeidina3 (Pen3), penaeidina4 (Pen4), Crustina y Toll (LvToll) se sobre-expresaron entre las 3 y 24 h en ambos sistemas, y el factor 6 asociado al factor de necrosis tumoral (TRAF6) en BF como una respuesta temprana. Con respecto a la expresión diferencial entre los tratamientos, se presentaron 13 ocurrencias. Nueve donde el BF fue mayor que sin-BF y cuatro donde el no-BF fue mayor que el BF. La expresión fue más alta en BF que en no-BF en Pen3, Crustin, LvToll, TRAF6, IMD y LvArf4. En contraste, la expresión fue mayor en no-BF en Pen3, Pen4 y TRAF6. Conclusión: el BF modula la transcripción de los genes relacionados con la respuesta inmune en camarón como una respuesta temprana. Sin embargo, el SAR sin-BF promueve una respuesta similar.
Resumo Antecedentes: A criação de camarões está evoluindo de sistemas semi-intensivos para hiper-intensivos como tecnologia de bioflocos e sistemas de recirculação. Objetivo: Avaliar a resposta transcricional promovida pelo biofloco em um sistema de aquicultura recirculante (SAR). Métodos: Utilizamos RT-PCR quantitativo em tempo real para monitorar sete genes-chave relacionados ao sistema imune em pós-larvas de camarão, criados em SAR com e sem bioflocos (BF e no-BF). Além disso, apresentamos pela primeira vez sequências nucleotídicas do fator de ribosilação do ADP 4 (LvArf4) de Litopenaeus vannamei. Resultados: Os resultados mostraram que o Penaeidina3 (PEN3), Penaeidina4 (Pen4), Crustina e Toll genes (LvToll) foram sobre-expressos entre 3 e 24 h em ambos os sistemas, e o Factor de Necrose do Receptor 6 associado e protuberância (TRAF6) no BF como uma resposta precoce. Com relação à expressão diferencial entre tratamentos, 13 ocorrências foram apresentadas. Nove onde o BF foi maior do que os não-BF e quatro onde o não-BF foi maior do que o BF. A expressão foi maior do que em BF não-BF em Pen3, Crustin, LvToll, TRAF6, IMD e LvArf4. Em contraste, a expressão foi mais elevada no não-BF em Pen3, Pen4 e TRAF6. Conclusões: O BF modula a transcrição de resposta imune relacionada no camarão como um genes de resposta precoce. No entanto, o SAR não BF promove uma resposta semelhante.
