Deficiencies with CAGE-AID questionnaire in identifying nonmedical opioid use-a report of two cases.

BACKGROUND: The CAGE-AID questionnaire (Cut-down, Annoyed, Guilty, Eye-opener scale Adapted to Include Drugs) is used to screen patients for substance use disorder and nonmedical opioid use (NMOU). Major pain guidelines encourage using such screening tools for all patients including cancer patients before initiating opioids. We present two cases where the CAGE-AID results did not accurately identify the risk for NMOU. CASE DESCRIPTION: Patient 1 is a male in his 60s with metastatic prostate cancer was admitted for uncontrolled pain. Imaging revealed extensive spinal metastasis, needing initiation of methadone and hydromorphone. The CAGE-AID score was positive, placing him at risk for NMOU. This likely biased the providers, delaying opioid titration. Subsequently, doses were adjusted, and he was discharged with adequate pain control and no evidence of NMOU. Patient 2 is a male in his 40s with metastatic cholangiocarcinoma admitted for uncontrolled abdominal pain. The patient had multiple hospitalizations at different facilities with similar symptoms. The CAGE-AID score was negative. Despite this, the patient demonstrated behaviors such as demanding intravenous opioids, dose escalation, or interventions such as nerve blocks. The workup did not identify any etiology for the increased pain. The patient left the hospital against medical advice when his demands for intravenous opioids were not met. CONCLUSIONS: The CAGE-AID questionnaire alone does not accurately identify risks for NMOU. Screening tools must always be accompanied by a thorough clinical assessment of behaviors and pain mechanism. More research is needed to better characterize CAGE-AID false positives and negatives among patients with cancer pain.

Vulvar lichen sclerosus in women of reproductive age.

Vulvar lichen sclerosus (vLS) is an inflammatory skin condition that predominantly affects the vulvar and perianal regions. Approximately 50% of cases present prior to menopause; however, there is a paucity of data on vLS in women of reproductive age as well as during their pregnancies. A retrospective review was performed at two tertiary referral centers to better describe cases of vLS in women of reproductive age. Thirty-three patients with a mean age of 40 years met inclusion criteria. In this group, vulvar pruritus was the most common presenting symptom (52%); 61% had biopsy-proven vLS, 42% had at least one autoimmune condition, 21% had comorbid depression or anxiety, 33% were given an incorrect diagnosis prior to vLS, and 42% had documented nonadherence to topical steroids. Among the eight patients who became pregnant, four had cesarean deliveries and 63% were symptomatic during pregnancy. When treating a woman who presents with vulvar pruritus or skin changes, vLS should be considered.