Clinical characteristics, management, and quality of life of psoriasis patients with coexistent lupus erythematosus: Data from the Malaysian Psoriasis Registry.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical characteristics, management and quality of life of psoriasis patients with and without coexistent lupus erythematosus (LE). METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study uses data from the Malaysian Psoriasis Registry (MPR) from January 2007 to December 2018. RESULTS: Of 21 735 psoriasis patients, 34 (0.16%) had coexistent LE. The male to female ratio among psoriasis patients with coexistent LE was 1:5.8 versus 1.3:1 in patients with psoriasis but without LE. Nearly 70% presented with LE preceding psoriasis. Psoriasis patients with LE had an earlier age of psoriasis onset (27.56 ± 11.51 versus 33.31 ± 16.94 years, P = 0.006), a higher rate of psoriatic arthropathy (26.5% versus 13.0%, P = 0.02), and a significantly greater impairment of quality of life (Dermatology Quality of Life Index >10; 57.6% versus 40.3%, P = 0.04) compared with psoriasis patients without LE. The majority (87.5%) had systemic LE. The incidences of lupus nephritis (72.7% versus 40%) and hematological abnormalities (50% versus 20%) were higher among patients with LE preceding psoriasis compared with those with psoriasis preceding LE. Antinuclear antibody and double-stranded DNA were positive in 59.4% and 28.1% of psoriasis patients with LE, respectively. Hydroxychloroquine triggered the onset of psoriasis in 7 (24.1%) patients. Patients with LE were more likely to receive systemic treatment for psoriasis compared with those without LE (30.3% versus 14.2%, P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Psoriasis patients with coexistent LE were uncommon, displayed a female preponderance, were more likely to have joint involvement, and had greater quality of life impairment than those without LE. LE preceded psoriasis in most of these patients, and systemic LE was the most common subtype.

Quality of life of leprosy patients in Sabah

@#Objective: To determine the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) among the subtypes of leprosy and to examine correlation with deformity and lepra reactions. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study done at Dermatology Outpatient Clinic, Queen Elizabeth Hospital and two health clinics in Kota Kinabalu between 1st April 2019 and 30th November 2019. A standardised case report form was formulated to collect the demographic data and disease profile of the leprosy patients. The quality of life (QoL) was assessed using Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) questionnaire. Results: A total of 54 patients were included with a male to female ratio of 2.4:1 (38 males and 16 females). The mean DLQI score was 8.31±6.15. The difference between the mean DLQI scores among the leprosy subtypes was not significant. The most affected domain was symptoms and feeling followed by daily activities and leisure. Twenty-one patients (38.9%) had facial deformity and they were found to have significantly higher DLQI score. WHO grade 1 and 2 disability were observed in 37 patients (68.5%) with higher DLQI score compared to those without any disability. More than half of patients with MB leprosy (52.2%) developed lepra reactions but the difference of mean DLQI scores were not significant. Conclusions: Leprosy-related disabilities may predispose patients to develop psychosocial problems which may have negative impact on QoL. Thus, periodic assessment of QoL should be incorporated into the management of leprosy patients