Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Rheumatol ; 43(7): 2245-2252, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38831206

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Determine domain-based-outcomes and steroid-sparing efficacy of generic tofacitinib in IIM. METHODS: This is a multicenter retrospective study wherein clinical phenotype, autoantibody profile, prior immunosuppressives, and outcomes at 3, 6, and 12 months were retrieved for IIM patients prescribed tofacitinib. Overall clinical response was assessed as complete or partial remission as per physician judgment. Changes in cutaneous and calcinosis domain were recorded as per physician global assessment (PGA), lung domain as per medical research council (MRC) dyspnea scale, and muscle strength by Manual Muscle Testing-8 (MMT-8). RESULTS: Forty-two patients of IIM with mean age 38.7 ± 16 years; (76.2% (N = 32) women), median duration of illness 48 (19;88) months were included. Commonest indication for initiating tofacitinib was either for refractory or as steroid sparing for cutaneous domain (N = 25/42, 59.5%) followed by calcinosis (N = 16/42, 38%). Overall complete and/or partial remission was achieved in 23/37 (64.8%), 30/35 (85.7%), and 29/30 (96.6%) patients at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. At 12-month follow-up, there was a reduction in prednisolone dose, with absolute decrease from a daily dose of 17.5 mg (IQR 5;50) to 2.5 mg (IQR 0;5) (p < 0.001). Individual domain assessments revealed improvement in cutaneous domain [16/25 (64%)] and calcinosis [6/15 (40%)]. Adverse effects included herpes zoster (N = 2/42, 4.8%) and dyslipidemia (N = 4/42, 9.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with generic tofacitinib significantly reduces the daily dose of corticosteroids and is effective in cutaneous domain including calcinosis in IIM. KEY POINTS: • This multicenter retrospective study is the first real-world data from India, elucidating steroid sparing efficacy of generic tofacitinib in patients with inflammatory myositis. • Domain-based outcome assessment suggests good clinical improvement especially in cutaneous domain, even those with refractory disease. • Modest benefits were evident in calcinosis, but its effect on the muscle and pulmonary domain appears limited.


Assuntos
Miosite , Piperidinas , Pirimidinas , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Pirimidinas/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto , Piperidinas/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Miosite/tratamento farmacológico , Resultado do Tratamento , Índia , Indução de Remissão , Adulto Jovem , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/uso terapêutico , Pirróis/uso terapêutico
2.
Cureus ; 15(10): e46391, 2023 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37927736

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Tofacitinib has emerged as a therapeutic option for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) following successful clinical trials. The evidence on the efficacy of tofacitinib generics in the management of axSpA is limited. In India, the usage of conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) is commonplace in the management of axSpA. Our primary aim was to identify the csDMARD and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-sparing role of tofacitinib generics in an axSpA population. METHODS: This was a retrospective study in a real-world clinical setting. Data from nine rheumatology centers across India were analyzed for 168 patients with active axSpA who were initiated on generic tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily in conjunction with csDMARDs and NSAIDs, over a duration of six months. Our primary outcome was to evaluate the csDMARD and NSAID-sparing effect of tofacitinib generics, while the secondary outcome assessed safety profiles and efficacy at six months. RESULTS: The median Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) score of the study population was 3.91 (3.26, 4.56). Alongside tofacitinib generics, 121 (72%) patients were co-administered csDMARDs (methotrexate/sulfasalazine/both), and 90 (53.6%) patients were co-administered NSAIDs. The csDMARD, NSAID, and combined csDMARD + NSAID-sparing effects of tofacitinib generics were seen in 85 (50.6%), 156 (92.9%), and 81 (48.2%) patients, respectively. Adverse events were mild and well-tolerated. At six months, 124 (57.9%) patients had attained clinically important improvement in ASDAS ESR score, and the median decrease in ASDAS ESR score was 2.02 (1.18, 2.96). CONCLUSION: This real-world study provides evidence supporting the csDMARD and NSAID-sparing ability of tofacitinib generics in the treatment of axSpA. Tofacitinib generics displayed a good safety profile and showed signals of efficacy as well.

3.
Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus ; 39(3): 450-455, 2023 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37304492

RESUMO

Evidence on agreement of point-of-care (POC) INR testing with laboratory testing in APS patients on oral anticoagulation (OAC), is scarce. This study assessed agreement of paired PT INR testing by a POC device vs. conventional platform-based laboratory test, in APS patients on OAC using a pre-determined definition of agreement. Simultaneous paired PT INR estimation in 92 APS patients was carried out, during October 2020-September 2021. POC INR was performed on capillary blood (pin prick) using the qLabs® PT-INR hand-held device, while laboratory INR estimation was performed using citrated blood (venepuncture) on STA-R Max Analyzer® using STA-NeoPTimal thromboplastin reagent®. Concordance was defined no greater than ± 30% (as per international standards ISO 17593:2007 guidelines) for each paired INR estimation. Agreement between the two was defined as ≥ 90% of paired INR measurements being concordant. 211 paired estimations were performed, within which 190 (90%) were concordant. Good correlation was seen between the 2 methods of INR estimation on Bland Altman plot analysis with an Intra-class correlation coefficient (95% CI) of 0.91(0.882, 0.932). Lab INR range > 4 (P = 0.001) was a significant predictor of higher variability between both methods of INR estimation. Lupus anti-coagulant, other anti-phospholipid antibodies (APL) or triple APL positivity did not result in any statistically significant variation in paired measurements. This study demonstrated good correlation between POC INR measurement and Lab INR estimation and agreement was ascertained between the 2 methods in APS patients on OAC.

4.
Clin Rheumatol ; 41(5): 1569-1575, 2022 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35041110

RESUMO

We report a series of 3 Adult-onset Still's disease (AOSD)-like presentations in previously healthy females following vaccination with the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine, and also compare them with similar cases reported in literature through a PubMed database search. Our first patient had a high spiking bi-quotidian type of fever with myalgia, sore throat, and arthritis with onset 10-day post-vaccination, with laboratory features of hyper inflammation responding to only naproxen. She was off treatment after 2 months. The second patient, with onset 3-week post-vaccination, had a more severe illness, requiring high dose immunosuppression. In our third case, the onset of illness was slightly delayed i.e., 3-month post-vaccination, but she had the most severe disease with macrophage activation syndrome at presentation requiring immunosuppression and biologicals. The underlying mechanism may be linked to the activation of Toll-like receptors (TLR)-TLR-7 and TLR-9-leading to a robust immune response. These 3 cases highlight the immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines, with the possibility of occurrence of new-onset systemic hyper-inflammation illness which can happen a few days following the vaccination, sometimes even delayed to months, and can range in severity from mild to even life-threatening. More cases need to be studied to understand the profile and prognosis of these syndromes in the long run.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Doença de Still de Início Tardio , Adulto , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , Feminino , Humanos , Inflamação , Doença de Still de Início Tardio/tratamento farmacológico , Vacinação/efeitos adversos
5.
Int J Rheum Dis ; 24(12): 1467-1472, 2021 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34181319

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare inflammation at the interphalangeal (IP) joint of thumb in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), undifferentiated inflammatory arthritis (UIA), and in psoriasis patients without clinical arthritis (PsO) using low-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: Age-matched and disease duration-matched patients with inflammatory arthritis (RA, PsA, and UIA) and psoriasis patients without clinical arthritis (PsO), who had undergone MRI of hands were included in this study. The presence or absence of MRI inflammatory lesions including synovitis, tenosynovitis, and bone marrow edema was assessed by three independent readers. Agreement between the readers was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Risk ratio of MRI global inflammation around thumb IP joints among patients with PsA was compared with the other groups. RESULTS: Clinical parameters and MRI inflammation were studied in 161 patients (42 PsA, 28 RA, 29 UIA, and 62 PsO). Global MRI inflammation at the IP joint of the thumb was observed in 33.3% of PsA patients compared with 14.3% in RA, and 10.3% in UIA. Subclinical MRI inflammation was observed in 8.1% of patients with PsO. The risk ratios of MRI global inflammation at the IP joint of the thumb in PsA patients were 2.3 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86-6.36) and 3.2 (95% CI 1.02-10.21) compared with RA and UIA patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: Global MRI inflammation around the IP joint of the thumb is significantly more common in patients with PsA as compared to individuals with UIA.


Assuntos
Artrite Psoriásica/patologia , Articulações dos Dedos/diagnóstico por imagem , Polegar/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto , Artrite Psoriásica/diagnóstico , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos
6.
Clin Rheumatol ; 40(5): 1871-1879, 2021 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33058032

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of response to combination conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD) therapy with methotrexate (MTX) and sulfasalazine (SSZ) in active axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) patients without peripheral arthritis (group 1) as compared to active axSpA with peripheral arthritis (group 2), who are economically constrained for biologicals. METHODS: A prospective, observational, single-centre, cohort study on 150 consecutive active axSpA patients who were already initiated on the above mentioned combination csDMARD therapy and satisfying the other pre-defined eligibility criteria, was conducted between July 2016 and July 2017 using ASAS20 response as primary outcome measure at 3 and 6 months post treatment. RESULTS: ASAS20 response at 3 months was achieved in 31/58 (53.4%) and in 24/36 (66.6%) in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.2); at 6 months, these figures were 45/76 (59.2%) and 28/44 (63.6%), respectively (p = 0.6). Similarly, there was significant reduction in mean ASAS NSAID index from 29.6 to 14 over 6 months from baseline (p = 0.001), and it was similar in both groups. Using BASDAI ≥ 4 to define active disease, a 34% reduction in requirement of biologicals was also observed. CONCLUSION: In resource-limited population, treatment with combination of methotrexate and sulphasalazine over a period of 6 months is equally efficacious in patients with active axSpA with and without peripheral arthritis, as evidenced by improved ASAS20 response rates, reduction in NSAID use and fewer patients switching to biologicals. Key Points • Combination of MTX+SSZ was efficacious and safe in active axSpA patients who had economic hardships to use biologicals. • This benefit in axSpA patients was similar between those without any peripheral arthritis and those with. • MTX+SSZ combination therapy also demonstrated NSAID sparing action. • Combination of MTX and SSZ prevented escalation to biological therapy as per a BASDAI score driven policy.


Assuntos
Antirreumáticos , Espondilartrite , Espondilite Anquilosante , Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Estudos de Coortes , Humanos , Metotrexato/uso terapêutico , Estudos Prospectivos , Espondilartrite/tratamento farmacológico , Espondilite Anquilosante/tratamento farmacológico , Sulfassalazina/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento
7.
PLoS One ; 15(8): e0237999, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32822427

RESUMO

Hyper-IgD syndrome (HIDS, OMIM #260920) is a rare autosomal recessive autoinflammatory disorder caused by pathogenic variants in the mevalonate kinase (MVK) gene. HIDS has an incidence of 1:50,000 to 1:5,000, and is thought to be prevalent mainly in northern Europe. Here, we report a case series of HIDS from India, which includes ten patients from six families who presented with a wide spectrum of clinical features such as recurrent fever, oral ulcers, rash, arthritis, recurrent diarrhea, hepatosplenomegaly, and high immunoglobulin levels. Using whole exome sequencing (WES) and/or Sanger capillary sequencing, we identified five distinct genetic variants in the MVK gene from nine patients belonging to six families. The variants were classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic as per the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology (ACMG-AMP) guidelines for annotation of sequence variants. Over 70% of patients in the present study had two recurrent mutations in MVK gene i.e. a nonsynonymous variant p.V377I, popularly known as the 'Dutch mutation', along with a splicing variant c.226+2delT in a compound heterozygous form. Identity by descent analysis in two patients with the recurrent variants identified a 6.7 MB long haplotype suggesting a founder effect in the South Indian population. Our analysis suggests that a limited number of variants account for the majority of the patients with HIDS in South India. This has implications in clinical diagnosis, as well as in the development of cost-effective approaches for genetic diagnosis and screening. To our best knowledge, this is the first and most comprehensive case series of clinically and genetically characterized patients with HIDS from India.


Assuntos
Povo Asiático/genética , Deficiência de Mevalonato Quinase/patologia , Fosfotransferases (Aceptor do Grupo Álcool)/genética , Adolescente , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Deleção de Genes , Estudos de Associação Genética , Haplótipos , Heterozigoto , Humanos , Índia , Lactente , Masculino , Deficiência de Mevalonato Quinase/genética , Linhagem , Fosfotransferases (Aceptor do Grupo Álcool)/química , Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único , Estrutura Terciária de Proteína , Sequenciamento do Exoma
8.
Rheumatol Int ; 39(12): 2053-2060, 2019 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31263994

RESUMO

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and other autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRD) tend to co-aggregate in families, making positive familial history a risk factor. We aimed to estimate familial aggregation of AIRD in SLE patients and to compare between ones having a positive and negative family history of autoimmunity in our cohort. We included families of 157 consecutive SLE patients in a hospital-based, cross-sectional design for a three-generation pedigree study. Clinical and laboratory parameters of these patients were recorded. AIRD was seen in families of 39 SLE patients amounting to a familial prevalence of 24.8% [95% confidence interval (CI) 18.1, 31.6] with a relative risk (λ) of 4.3 for first-degree relatives (FDRs) and 1.1 for second-degree relatives (SDRs). SLE was the commonest AIRD seen in families of 19 patients with a familial prevalence of 12.1% (95% CI 7.0, 17.2) and λ of 78.2 for FDRs and 18.1 for SDRs. AIRD as a whole and SLE alone were seen more commonly with parental consanguinity (p < 0.05). Familial aggregation in SLE patients also showed a relatively higher percentage of affected males and lesser presentation with constitutional features (p < 0.05) than sporadic SLE patients. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) was the second most common AIRD seen in 16/39 (41%) families with a RR of 3.1 in FDRs of SLE patients. In conclusion, Asian Indian SLE patients seem to have a high familial aggregation of AIRD, which is more pronounced in the background of parental consanguinity. SLE is the commonest AIRD seen amongst FDRs and SDRs of SLE patients, followed by RA, with FDRs being at highest risk.


Assuntos
Doenças Autoimunes/epidemiologia , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/epidemiologia , Doenças Reumáticas/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Autoanticorpos/imunologia , Doenças Autoimunes/genética , Doenças Autoimunes/imunologia , Autoimunidade , Comorbidade , Consanguinidade , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Humanos , Índia , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/genética , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/imunologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Linhagem , Prevalência , Doenças Reumáticas/genética , Doenças Reumáticas/imunologia , Adulto Jovem
9.
Clin Rheumatol ; 38(2): 545-553, 2019 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30255283

RESUMO

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is the most common acquired pro-thrombotic disorder, also associated with obstetric complications. Phosphatidylserine/Prothrombin complex antibody (aPSPT) though associated with various APS manifestations, is not included in the revised Sapporo Criteria. To study the prevalence of aPSPT in Asian-Indian patients with suspected APS and compare its performance with the criteria anti-phospholipid antibodies (APLs). Electronic charts of 372 individuals whose sera was tested for aPSPT in suspected APS between June 2014 and May 2016 were retrieved and analyzed. aPSPT was assayed by ELISA. aPSPT tested individuals were categorized into cases-seropositive and seronegative APS (SNAPS) and controls. aPSPT was positive in 24/58 (41.3%) cases and 17/314 (5.4%) controls (p < 0.001). aPSPT positivity was seen in 44.5%, 38.7%, and 58.4% in primary, secondary and SNAPS patients respectively. aPSPT had the best performance among all APLs, in obstetric APS with 31% sensitivity, 97.7% specificity, and an odds ratio of 18.8. It showed 41.4% sensitivity, 94.6% specificity for the classification/diagnosis of primary APS and 38.7% sensitivity, 91.5% specificity for secondary APS. Addition of aPSPT to current APS criteria to SNAPS patients led to reclassification of additional 12.1% patients as APS overall and 42.8% in obstetric APS category. In Asian-Indian patients with suspected APS, aPSPT outperformed all classical APLs in diagnosis/classification of obstetric APS and both isotypes of beta 2-glycoprotein-I antibodies in diagnosis/classification of APS. aPSPT could reclassify additional 12.1 and 42.8% patients as APS overall and obstetric APS respectively, over and above the cases satisfying revised Sapporo criteria.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Antifosfolipídeos/sangue , Síndrome Antifosfolipídica/diagnóstico , Síndrome Antifosfolipídica/epidemiologia , Adulto , Síndrome Antifosfolipídica/sangue , Biomarcadores/sangue , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática , Feminino , Humanos , Índia/epidemiologia , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Fosfatidilserinas/imunologia , Protrombina/imunologia , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Adulto Jovem , beta 2-Glicoproteína I/imunologia
10.
J Assoc Physicians India ; 65(5 Suppl): 30-32, 2017 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28836749

RESUMO

The advent of biologic therapies has brought in significant improvement in the outcome of patients suffering from chronic inflammatory arthritis. High costs and unavailability have however, limited their utility in some parts of the world. These limitations have been overcome to a good extent by the introduction of biosimilar versions of original products, which are gaining momentum, of late. Adalimumab (Humira®), a TNF-α inhibitor has been successfully used in patients with inflammatory arthritis for more than a decade now. ZRC3197 (Adalimumab Biosimilar) was developed in India and approved for use since 2014. Ongoing evaluation of safety in real-world setting outside the context of controlled clinical trials is pivotal in ensuring long-term safety of such biologic therapies. We share the real-life safety profile of biosimilar Adalimumab in patients with chronic inflammatory arthritis and other autoimmune conditions from a tertiary care centre in south India.


Assuntos
Adalimumab/efeitos adversos , Antirreumáticos/efeitos adversos , Medicamentos Biossimilares/efeitos adversos , Doenças Reumáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Adalimumab/uso terapêutico , Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Medicamentos Biossimilares/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Índia , Masculino
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...