The MISOPRED score: Development and validation of a clinical scoring system to predict the effectiveness of Misoprostol treatment for early pregnancy loss.

BACKGROUND: Misoprostol treatment for early pregnancy loss has varied success demonstrated in previous studies. Incorporating predictors in a single clinical scoring system would be highly beneficial in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: To develop and evaluate the accuracy of a scoring system to predict misoprostol treatment outcomes for managing early pregnancy loss. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort and validation study. METHODS: Patients discharged from the gynecologic emergency department from 2013 to 2016, diagnosed with early pregnancy loss, who were treated with 800 mcg misoprostol, administrated vaginally were included. All were sonographically reevaluated within 48-72 hours. Patients in whom the gestational sac was not expelled or with endometrial lining >30 mm were offered a repeat dose and returned for reevaluation after seven days. A successful response was defined as complete expulsion. Clinical data were reviewed to identify predictors for successful responses. The scoring system was then retrospectively evaluated on a second cohort to evaluate its accuracy. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify factors most predictive of treatment response. RESULTS: The development cohort included 126 patients. Six factors were found to be most predictive of misoprostol treatment effectiveness: nulliparity, prior complete spontaneous abortion, gestational age, vaginal bleeding, abdominal pain, and mean sac diameter, yielding a score of 0-8 (the MISOPRED score), where 8 represents the highest-likelihood of success. The score was validated retrospectively with 119 participants. Successful response in the group with the lowest likelihood score (score 0-3) was 9%, compared with 82% in the highest likelihood score group (score 7-8). Using the MISOPRED score, approximately 15% of patients previously planned to receive misoprostol treatment can be referred for surgical management. CONCLUSIONS: MISOPRED score can be utilized as an adjunct tool for clinical decision-making in cases of Early pregnancy loss. To our knowledge, this is the first scoring system suggested to predict the success rate in these cases.

Can Social Support on Facebook Influence Fertility Outcomes?

Social support is known to reduce stress and increase quality of life among patients undergoing IVF. Increasing social media use introduces a social support mechanism, yet data regarding the effect of this support on IVF outcomes are scarce. This observational, retrospective cohort study included women undergoing their first IVF cycle at an academic tertiary medical center. Fertility outcomes were compared between 82 women who were active users of social media (posting on Facebook at least 3 times a week) and 83 women who did not use Facebook or any other social media platform (the control group). For the social media group, we coded all Facebook Feed activities (Posts, Comments, Likes) for each participant up to 8 weeks prior to beta hCG test. Social support was measured by average Likes and Comments per post, on fertility outcomes. The social media group included more single women than the control group (17% vs. 5%, respectively, p = 0.012) and had a shorter infertility duration (1.6 ± 0.9 years vs. 2.3 ± 1.4, respectively, p = 0.001(. We found a trend in fertilization rates between groups (social media group 58% vs. controls 50%, p = 0.07). No difference was found regarding pregnancy rate between groups (p = 0.587). The social media group had a lower miscarriage rate compared to the controls (6% vs. 25%, p = 0.042). These results were also validated in the multivariant regression analysis. Social support (via Facebook) may have a positive effect on IVF outcomes, especially regarding miscarriages rate, with minor effect regrading fertilization rate and no effect regarding pregnancy rate. Therefore, encouraging women to be active on Facebook during treatment, including OPU day, may impact treatment results.

Fetal Growth Restriction in Hypertensive vs. Heavy Smoking Women-Placental Pathology, Ultrasound Findings, and Pregnancy Outcomes.

We compared placental pathology, ultrasonographic findings, and obstetric outcomes, in gestations complicated by fetal growth restriction (FGR) with either a background of hypertensive disorder or heavy tobacco cigarette smoking. The medical records and placental pathology reports of pregnancies complicated with FGR (birthweight < 10th percentile) between December 2008 and May 2018 from a single tertiary center were reviewed. Placental pathology, ultrasound findings, and pregnancy outcomes were compared between hypertensive patients (HTN) and heavy smokers (SMO). We included 213 pregnancies: 129 (60.6%) in the SMO group and 84 (39.4%) in the HTN group. The HTN group was characterized by a higher BMI (p = 0.01), higher rates of Cesarean deliveries (p = 0.006), and a lower gestational age at delivery (35.6 ± 3.8 vs. 37.5 ± 2.9 weeks, p < 0.001). The HTN group had higher rates of placental weights < 10th percentile (p = 0.04) and maternal vascular malperfusion lesions (p < 0.001), while the SMO group had higher rates of inflammatory lesions (p = 0.04). On ultrasound, the HTN group had a higher head/abdomen circumference ratio (p < 0.001) and more abnormal Doppler studies (< 0.001). Neonates in the HTN group had lower birthweights (p < 0.001) and higher rates of NICU admissions (p = 0.002) and adverse neonatal outcome (p = 0.006). On multivariable analysis, gestational age at delivery (aOR = 0.65, 95%CI 0.55-0.87), hypertensive disorders (aOR = 1.8, 95%CI = 1.21-4.81), placental MVM lesions (aOR = 1.23, 95%CI = 1.08-5.02), and the combination of HTN+MVM (aOR = 2.63, 95%CI 1.78-7.30) were independently associated with adverse neonatal outcome. Hypertension and smoking may lead to FGR in different pathways as the two groups significantly differed in maternal characteristics, placental pathology, ultrasound findings, and neonatal outcomes. A hypertensive disorder probably represents a more hostile maternal environment than smoking and these pregnancies would probably benefit from closes monitoring.