Influenza vaccines: the potential benefits of cell-culture isolation and manufacturing.

Influenza continues to cause severe illness in millions and deaths in hundreds of thousands annually. Vaccines are used to prevent influenza outbreaks, however, the influenza virus mutates and annual vaccination is required for optimal protection. Vaccine effectiveness is also affected by other potential factors such as the human immune system, a mismatch with the chosen candidate virus, and egg adaptation associated with egg-based vaccine production. This article reviews the influenza vaccine development process and describes the implications of the changes to the cell-culture process and vaccine strain recommendations by the World Health Organization since the 2017 season. The traditional manufacturing process for influenza vaccines relies on fertilized chicken eggs that are used for vaccine production. Vaccines must be produced in large volumes and the complete process requires approximately 6 months for the egg-based process. In addition, egg adaptation of seed viruses occurs when viruses adapt to avian receptors found within eggs to allow for growth in eggs. These changes to key viral antigens may result in antigenic mismatch and thereby reduce vaccine effectiveness. By contrast, cell-derived seed viruses do not require fertilized eggs and eliminate the potential for egg-adapted changes. As a result, cell-culture technology improves the match between the vaccine virus strain and the vaccine selected strain, and has been associated with increased vaccine effectiveness during a predominantly H3N2 season. During the 2017-2018 influenza season, a small number of studies conducted in the United States compared the effectiveness of egg-based and cell-culture vaccines and are described here. These observational and retrospective studies demonstrate that inactivated cell-culture vaccines were more effective than egg-based vaccines. Adoption of cell-culture technology for influenza vaccine manufacturing has been reported to improve manufacturing efficiency and the additional benefit of improving vaccine effectiveness is a key factor for future policy making considerations.

Comparison of vaccine effectiveness against influenza hospitalization of cell-based and egg-based influenza vaccines, 2017-2018.

Egg-based influenza vaccines could be less effective than cell-based vaccine due to adaptive mutations acquired for growth. We conducted a test-negative case-control study at Kaiser Permanente Southern California to assess vaccine effectiveness (VE) against hospitalization for laboratory-confirmed influenza during 2017-2018. Among the 1186 cases and 6946 controls, 74% and 59%, respectively, were ages ≥ 65 years. For any influenza, the adjusted relative VE of cell-based vaccine versus egg-based vaccines was 43% (95% CI: -45% to 77%) for patients ages < 65 years and 6% (95% CI: -46% to 39%) for patients ages ≥ 65 years. For influenza A(H3N2), the adjusted relative VE was 61% (95% CI: -63% to 91%) for patients ages < 65 years and -4% (95% CI: -70% to 37%) for patients ages ≥ 65 years. Statistically significant protection against influenza hospitalization of cell-based vaccine compared to egg-based vaccines was not observed, but further studies in additional influenza seasons are warranted.

Efficacy of intravenous tigecycline in patients with Acinetobacter complex infections: results from 14 Phase III and Phase IV clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Acinetobacter infections, especially multidrug-resistant (MDR) Acinetobacter infections, are a global health problem. This study aimed to describe clinical outcomes in patients with confirmed Acinetobacter spp. isolates who were treated with tigecycline in randomized clinical trials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 14 multinational, randomized (open-label or double-blind), and active-controlled (except one) Phase III and IV studies were analyzed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS: A total of 174 microbiologically evaluable patients with Acinetobacter spp. infections (including MDR infections) were identified, and 95 received tigecycline to treat community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), diabetic foot infections (DFIs), hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs), infections with resistant pathogens (RPs), or complicated skin and skin-structure infections. The rate of cure of tigecycline for most indications was 70%-80%, with the highest (88.2%) in cIAIs. The rate of cure of the comparators was generally higher than tigecycline, but within each indication the 95% CIs for clinical cure for each treatment group overlapped. For most Acinetobacter isolates, the minimum inhibitory concentration of tigecycline was 0.12-2 µg/mL, with seven at 4 µg/mL and one at 8 µg/mL. The cure rate by tigecycline was 50% (95% CI 12.5%-87.5% in CAP) to 88.2% (95% CI 66.2%-97.1% in cIAIs) for all Acinetobacter, and 72.7% (95% CI 54.5%-93.2% in HAP) to 100% (95% CI 25%-100.0% in cIAIs) for MDR Acinetobacter. For the comparators, it was 83.8% (95% CI 62.8%-95.9% in HAP) to 100% (95% CI 75%-100% in cIAIs and 25%-100.0% in RPs) and 88% (95% CI 66%-97% in HAP) to 100% (95% CI 25%-100% in cIAIs and 75%-100% in DFIs), respectively. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that with appropriate monitoring, tigecycline may be a useful consideration for Acinetobacter infections alone or in combination with other anti-infective agents when other therapies are not suitable.

Characteristics of a new meningococcal serogroup B vaccine, bivalent rLP2086 (MenB-FHbp; Trumenba®).

Neisseria meningitidis is a common cause of bacterial meningitis, often leading to permanent sequelae or death. N. meningitidis is classified into serogroups based on the composition of the bacterial capsular polysaccharide; the 6 major disease-causing serogroups are designated A, B, C, W, X, and Y. Four of the 6 disease-causing serogroups (A, C, Y, and W) can be effectively prevented with available quadrivalent capsular polysaccharide protein conjugate vaccines; however, capsular polysaccharide conjugate vaccines are not effective against meningococcal serogroup B (MnB). There is no vaccine available for serogroup X. The public health need for an effective serogroup B vaccine is evident, as MnB is the most common cause of meningococcal disease in the United States and is responsible for almost half of all cases in persons aged 17 to 22 years. In fact, serogroup B meningococci were responsible for the recent meningococcal disease outbreaks on college campuses. However, development of a suitable serogroup B vaccine has been challenging, as serogroup B polysaccharide-based vaccines were found to be poorly immunogenic. Vaccine development for MnB focused on identifying potential outer membrane protein targets that elicit broadly protective immune responses across strains from the vast number of proteins that exist on the bacterial surface. Human factor H binding protein (fHBP; also known as LP2086), a conserved surface-exposed bacterial lipoprotein, was identified as a promising vaccine candidate. Two recombinant protein-based serogroup B vaccines that contain fHBP have been successfully developed and licensed in the United States under an accelerated approval process: bivalent rLP2086 (MenB-FHbp; Trumenba®) and 4CMenB (MenB-4 C; Bexsero®). This review will focus on bivalent rLP2086 only, including vaccine components, mechanism of action, and potential coverage across serogroup B strains in the United States.

History of Meningococcal Outbreaks in the United States: Implications for Vaccination and Disease Prevention.

Invasive meningococcal disease caused by Neisseria meningitidis presents a significant public health concern. Meningococcal disease is rare but potentially fatal within 24 hours of onset of illness, and survivors may experience permanent sequelae. This review presents the epidemiology, incidence, and outbreak data for invasive meningococcal disease in the United States since 1970, and it highlights recent changes in vaccine recommendations to prevent meningococcal disease. Relevant publications were obtained by database searches for articles published between January 1970 and July 2015. The incidence of meningococcal disease has decreased in the United States since 1970, but serogroup B meningococcal disease is responsible for an increasing proportion of disease burden in young adults. Recent serogroup B outbreaks on college campuses warrant broader age-based recommendations for meningococcal group B vaccines, similar to the currently recommended quadrivalent vaccine that protects against serogroups A, C, W, and Y. After the recent approval of two serogroup B vaccines, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices first updated its recommendations for routine meningococcal vaccination to cover at-risk populations, including those at risk during serogroup B outbreaks, and later it issued a recommendation for those aged 16-23 years. Meningococcal disease outbreaks remain challenging to predict, making the optimal disease management strategy one of prevention through vaccination rather than containment. How the epidemiology of serogroup B disease and prevention of outbreaks will be affected by the new category B recommendation for serogroup B vaccines remains to be seen.

Tigecycline pharmacokinetics, tolerability, safety, and effect on intestinal microflora in healthy Japanese male subjects.

Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of tigecycline in 76 healthy Japanese subjects were determined in three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies. Subjects in an ascending single-dose study (n = 40) received 25-150 mg intravenously, whereas subjects in two multiple-dose studies received every 12-hour (q12h) dosing with 25 mg (n = 10) or 25, 50, or 100 then 50 mg (n = 30). Serial blood samples and urine were collected, drug concentrations determined, and pharmacokinetic parameters calculated. Fecal samples were also collected in the second multiple-dose study. After 10 days of tigecycline 50 mg q12h, mean ± standard deviation pharmacokinetics in 8/10 subjects were: maximum concentration 1,118 ± 127 ng/mL, area under the concentration-time curve 0-12 hours 3,261 ± 937 ng h/mL, clearance 0.25 ± 0.05 L/h/kg, half-life 60.7 ± 23.4 hours, and volume of distribution 11.9 ± 2.3 L/kg. The most common adverse events were nausea and vomiting. Changes in total bilirubin were also observed. Enterococci in the intestinal microflora were reduced, whereas the number of Enterobacteriaceae and Bacteroides remained relatively constant. Several strains of Bacteroides spp. resistant to tigecycline treatment were found in fecal samples on days 30 and 31. The pharmacokinetic profile of tigecycline was similar to non-Japanese subjects; tolerability and change in intestinal microflora were also similar.

Serum quinidine concentrations and effect on QT dispersion and interval.

OBJECTIVE: To establish a relationship between serum quinidine concentrations (SQCs) and QT interval dispersion, compared with corresponding QT intervals, in order to identify a reason why many reports describe torsade de pointes as occurring at subtherapeutic concentrations. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: University teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Eleven patients with atrial arrhythmias managed with quinidine therapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients with subtherapeutic (<2 microg/mL) and therapeutic (2-5 microg/mL) SQCs with corresponding 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) (25 mm/sec) and baseline ECG were evaluated for QT interval dispersion, calculated as the maximum minus the minimum QT interval on the 12-lead ECG. RESULTS: Mean +/- SD subtherapeutic and therapeutic SQCs were 1.48 +/- 0.39 microg/mL and 3.78 +/- 0.88 microg/mL (p < 0.001). Baseline values for QT/QTc intervals were 376.4 +/- 59.2/429.5 +/- 57.3 msec. At subtherapeutic and therapeutic SQCs, mean QT/QTc intervals were 403.6 +/- 59.9/450.5 +/- 38.5 msec and 439.1 +/- 48.9/472.4 +/- 44.6 msec, respectively. Mean QT dispersion was 47 +/- 16.2 msec at baseline, 98.2 +/- 27.5 msec at subtherapeutic SQC, and 70.9 +/- 33.9 msec at therapeutic SQCs (p = 0.001 for overall analysis; p < 0.001 for baseline vs. subtherapeutic concentrations; p = NS for therapeutic vs. subtherapeutic in post hoc comparison). CONCLUSIONS: Despite QT interval lengthening with increasing SQCs, QT dispersion was numerically greatest at subtherapeutic SQCs. Further study is required to determine the value of QT dispersion as a tool for identifying proarrhythmic risk with drugs that prolong the QT interval.