Performance of J-CTO and PROGRESS CTO Scores in Predicting Angiographic Success and Long-term Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions for Chronic Total Occlusions.

Patient selection for and predicting clinical outcomes of chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remain challenging. We hypothesized that both J-CTO (Multicenter Chronic Total Occlusion Registry of Japan) and PROGRESS CTO (Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Chronic Total Occlusion Intervention) scores will predict not only angiographic success but also long-term clinical outcomes of the patients who underwent PCI of CTO. Of 325 CTO PCIs performed at 2 Emory University hospitals from January 2012 to August 2015, 249 patients with complete baseline clinical, angiographic and follow-up data, were included in this analysis. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) consisted of a composite of death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization. Mean age was 63 ± 11 years old and mean follow-up was 19.8 ± 13.1 months. Angiographic success rates increased from 74.5% in 2012 to 85.7% in 2015. Greater J-CTO and PROGRESS CTO scores were not only associated with lower likelihood of angiographic success but also higher rates of long-term MACE. Compared with the scores of 0 to 2, J-CTO and PROGRESS CTO scores of ≥3 were associated with higher MACE. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that PROGRESS CTO scores of ≥3, male sex, and peripheral vascular disease were independent predictors of MACE. In conclusion, J-CTO and PROGRESS CTO scores are useful in predicting procedural success. In addition, the PROGRESS CTO score, and to a lesser degree J-CTO score, have predictive value for long-term outcomes in patients who underwent CTO PCI.

Discordance Between Fractional Flow Reserve and Coronary Flow Reserve: Insights From Intracoronary Imaging and Physiological Assessment.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the epicardial and microvascular substrates associated with discordances between fractional flow reserve (FFR) and coronary flow reserve (CFR) values. BACKGROUND: Discordances between FFR and CFR remain poorly characterized. METHODS: FFR, hyperemic stenosis resistance (HSR), and intravascular ultrasound were performed as indexes of epicardial function and CFR and hyperemic microvascular resistance (HMR) as measures of microvascular function in 94 patients with moderate coronary stenosis. Maximal plaque burden (PBmax), HSR, and HMR were calculated in 4 quadrants based on values of FFR ≤0.80 and CFR ≤2.0 as follows: concordant normal (preserved FFR and CFR), concordant abnormal (low FFR and CFR), discordant low FFR and preserved CFR, and discordant preserved FFR and low CFR. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients (68%) had concordant FFR and CFR findings, and 30 patients (32%) had discordant FFR and CFR. Compared with patients with preserved FFR and CFR, those with low FFR and CFR had higher PBmax (p = 0.003), higher HSR (p < 0.001), and similar HMR. Among patients with preserved FFR, those with reduced CFR had similar PBmax and HSR but a trend toward higher HMR (p = 0.058) compared with patients with preserved CFR. Among patients with reduced FFR, those with preserved CFR had lower PBmax (p = 0.004), a trend toward lower HSR (p = 0.065), and lower HMR (p = 0.03) compared with patients with reduced CFR. Furthermore, compared with patients with preserved FFR and low CFR, those with low FFR and preserved CFR had higher HSR (p = 0.022) but lower HMR (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with moderate coronary stenosis, preserved FFR and low CFR is associated with increased microvascular resistance, while low FFR and preserved CFR has modest epicardial stenosis and preserved microvascular function.