A single high-fat Western meal modulates vascular responsiveness to sympathetic activation at rest and during exercise in humans: a randomized controlled trial.

A single high-fat Western meal transiently reduces endothelium-dependent vasodilation at rest, but the interaction with sympathetic vasoconstrictor activity during exercise remains unknown. Herein, we tested the hypothesis that a single high-fat Western meal would impair the ability of contracting skeletal muscle to offset vascular responsiveness to sympathetic activation during exercise, termed functional sympatholysis. In 18 (10 females/8 males) healthy young adults, forearm blood flow (Doppler ultrasound) and beat-to-beat arterial pressure (photoplethysmography) were measured during lower-body negative pressure (LBNP; -20 mmHg) applied at rest and simultaneously during low (15% maximum contraction) and moderate (30% maximum contraction)-intensity rhythmic handgrip exercise. The magnitude of sympatholysis was calculated as the difference of LBNP-induced changes in forearm vascular conductance (FVC) between handgrip and rest. Experiments were performed preprandial and 1 h, 2 h, and 3 h after a high- or low-fat meal. In the preprandial state, LBNP decreased resting FVC (Δ-54 ± 10%), and these responses were attenuated during low (Δ-17 ± 7%)- and moderate (Δ-8 ± 6%)-intensity handgrip exercise. Following a high-fat meal, LBNP induced attenuated decreases in resting FVC (3 h postprandial, Δ-47 ± 10%, P = 0.002 vs. preprandial) and blunted attenuation of FVC during low (3 h postprandial, Δ-23 ± 8%, P = 0.001 vs. preprandial)- and moderate (3 h postprandial, Δ-16 ± 6%, P < 0.001 vs. preprandial)-intensity handgrip exercise. The high-fat meal attenuated the magnitude of sympatholysis during low (preprandial, 38 ± 7 vs. 3 h postprandial, 23 ± 8%, P < 0.001)- and moderate (preprandial, 46 ± 11 vs. 3 h postprandial, 31 ± 10%, P < 0.001)-intensity handgrip exercise. The low-fat meal had no impact on these responses. In conclusion, a single high-fat Western meal modulates sympathetic vasoconstriction at rest and during low- and moderate-intensity handgrip exercise in young healthy adults.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We observed that a single high-fat Western meal, but not an isocaloric low-fat meal, attenuated the sympathetic vasoconstriction at rest and the ability of the active skeletal muscle to counteract the vascular responsiveness to sympathetic activation (i.e., functional sympatholysis) during low- and moderate-intensity rhythmic handgrip exercise in healthy young adults. Our findings highlight the potential deleterious vascular effect associated with the consumption of a Western diet.

Ischemic Preconditioning Acutely Improves Functional Sympatholysis during Handgrip Exercise in Healthy Males but not Females.

PURPOSE: Ischemic preconditioning (IPC), a procedure that involves the cyclic induction of limb ischemia and reperfusion via tourniquet inflation, has been reported to improve exercise capacity and performance, but the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. During exercise, sympathetically mediated vasoconstriction is dampened in active skeletal muscle. This phenomenon, termed functional sympatholysis, plays a critical role in maintaining oxygen delivery to working skeletal muscle and may contribute to determining exercise capacity. Herein, we investigate the effects of IPC on functional sympatholysis in humans. METHODS: In 20 (10M/10F) healthy young adults, forearm blood flow (Doppler ultrasound) and beat-to-beat arterial pressure (finger photoplethysmography) were measured during lower body negative pressure (LBNP; -20 mm Hg) applied at rest and simultaneously during rhythmic handgrip exercise (30% maximum contraction) before and after local IPC (4 × 5-min 220 mm Hg) or sham (4 × 5-min 20 mm Hg). Forearm vascular conductance (FVC) was calculated as forearm blood flow/mean arterial pressure and the magnitude of sympatholysis as the difference of LBNP-induced changes in FVC between handgrip and rest. RESULTS: At baseline, LBNP decreased FVC (females [F] = ∆-41% ± 19%; males [M] = ∆-44% ± 10%), and these responses were attenuated during handgrip (F = ∆-8% ± 9%; M = ∆-8% ± 7%). After IPC, LBNP induced similar decreases in resting FVC (F = ∆-37% ± 19%; M = ∆-44% ± 13%). However, during handgrip, this response was further attenuated in males (∆-3% ± 9%, P = 0.02 vs pre) but not females (∆-5% ± 10%, P = 0.13 vs pre), which aligned with an IPC-mediated increase in sympatholysis (M-pre = 36% ± 10% vs post = 40% ± 9%, P = 0.01; F-pre = 32% ± 15% vs post = 32% ± 14%, P = 0.82). Sham IPC had no effect on any variables. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight a sex-specific effect of IPC on functional sympatholysis and provide evidence of a potential mechanism underlying the beneficial effects of IPC on human exercise performance.