Reconstruction strategies after rupture of the extensor pollicis longus tendon: A systematic review.

Ruptures of the extensor pollicis longus (EPL) tendon result in a major loss of function. The most practiced reconstruction surgery appears to be extensor indicis proprius (EIP) transfer, which is contraindicated in certain cases. The objective of this review was to present the various reconstruction methods for the EPL tendon. A systematic review was conducted of the literature from 2010 to 2020 on strategies for reconstructing the EPL tendon. A search of the PubMed database was done using the following keywords: 'extensor', 'pollicis', 'longus', and 'thumb'. Data analyzed were the type of study, the number of patients, surgery, follow-up, and results. Of the 142 articles selected from PubMed, only 18 (12.7%) were included in the analysis. Follow-up ranged from 6 months to 6 years, with an average of 28 months, and the total number of patients was 515. Numerous strategies exist for reconstruction following rupture of the EPL tendon. The preferred modality seems to be a transfer of the EIP tendon with intraoperative testing of applied tension with the interphalangeal joint in extension, hand flat, forearm in pronation, and neutral wrist position. When the EIP is not available, other transfers should be considered if the patient has significant tendon attrition, or a graft should be considered if an isolated defect is present.

Contribution of thermal imaging in determining the depth of pediatric acute burns.

BACKGROUND: Early burn wound assessment is a major problem in pediatrics. It involves regular clinical evaluations, and may be helped by objective tools, such as thermal imagers. Because of the skin temperature difference between partial and full thickness burns, due to injured vascular perfusion of the dermis in the latter, it could precisely identify areas with superficial burns which could heal from controlled wound healing, and those with deep burns which would need skin graft, at an early stage. The objective of this study was to assess the validity of the Flir one thermal imager® for this purpose. METHODS: Thermal images were obtained by a single observer three times after burn: day 1-3 (T1); day 4-7 (T2); day 8-10 (T3). ΔT (temperature difference between burned area and healthy skin) was calculated on a tablet with Flir One application. Validity was assessed by comparing ΔT obtained at each time between two groups at day 15 depending on the healing time of the burn wounds : before or after day 15. Primary outcome was the AUC (area under curve) of the ROC (Receiver operating characteristic) curve for ΔT at T1, T2 and T3, representing the ability of the Flir One Thermal Imager® to discriminate between a healing time <15 days and >15 days. RESULTS: 40 patients were included (13 months to 13 years old). AUC at T1 and T2 are 0.700 (95% CI: 0.649; 0.925) and 0.787 (95% CI: 0.523; 0.877), respectively. AUC at T3 is 0.968 (95% CI: 0.918; 1.00). A ΔT threshold of -1.2°C at T3 is associated with a specificity of 100% allowing to diagnose as of day 8 all the patients having deep burns which heal after 15 days. CONCLUSIONS: The Flir One Thermal Imager® is an inexpensive, non-invasive, and easy-to-use device. It measures indirectly but with an excellent specificity the dermis perfusion reflecting the burns depth in children. However its low sensitivity calls for additional research to allow skin grafts earlier in common practice and decrease the length of stay.