Randomized clinical trial on safety of the natriuretic peptide ularitide as treatment of refractory cirrhotic ascites.

BACKGROUND: Sodium and water retention is a mainstay of the pathophysiology leading to ascites formation in patients with advanced cirrhosis. Refractory ascites denotes the most severe ascites status with limited treatment options and a poor prognosis. We investigated the efficacy and safety of the natriuretic peptide ularitide in patients with refractory cirrhotic ascites. METHODS: We conducted a randomized placebo-controlled trial investigating ularitide to manage refractory ascites. Until trial termination after interim analyses, we randomized 17 participants in a 2:1 ratio between ularitide (n=11) and placebo (n=6). While hospitalized, the participants received treatment for up to 48 hours. The primary efficacy endpoint was a change in renal water excretion, and secondary end points included changes in renal sodium excretion rate and body weight. The starting dose was 30 ng/kg/min, though later reduced to 20 for safety reasons. RESULTS: In contrast to the study hypothesis, the mean urine production decreased after 24 hours of ularitide treatment compared with the baseline level (22.8 vs. 47.5 mL/h, p=0.04) and decreased more in participants randomized to ularitide than placebo (24.7 vs. -6.2 mL/h, p=0.05). Ularitide did not increase the renal sodium excretion rate or reduce the weight gain. The incidence rate ratio of adverse reactions in ularitide versus placebo was 8.5 (95% CI: 2-35, p=0.003). Participants treated with ularitide developed serious blood pressure reductions, impacting their renal responsiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Ularitide in doses of 20-30 ng/kg/min did not benefit urine production and renal sodium excretion rate in patients with refractory ascites. The participants randomized to ularitide overall developed more adverse reactions than placebo. EudraCT no. 2019-002268-28.

Atorvastatin for patients with cirrhosis. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension face a high risk of complications. Besides their anti-inflammatory and antifibrotic effects, statins may reduce portal pressure and thus the risk of complications and mortality. We aimed to investigate the effects of atorvastatin on hospital admissions, mortality, inflammation, and lipidomics in cirrhosis with portal hypertension. METHODS: We performed a double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial among patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Atorvastatin (10-20 mg/d) was administered for 6 months. We measured splanchnic hemodynamics, analyzed inflammatory markers, and performed lipidomics at baseline and after 6 months. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients were randomized, with 38 patients allocated to atorvastatin and 40 patients to placebo. Fifty-nine patients completed 6 months of intervention. Comparisons between changes in each group were calculated. Liver-related complications and mortality were similar between the groups. The HVPG and Model for End-stage Liver Disease score did not change between groups (p=0.95 and 0.87, respectively). Atorvastatin decreased 3 of 42 inflammatory markers, CD62-L-selectin, matrix metalloproteinases-2, and TNF-α (p-values: 0.005, 0.011, and 0.023, respectively), while lipidomics was not significantly changed. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with cirrhosis, atorvastatin was safe to use, but did not reduce mortality, the risk of liver-related complications, or the HVPG. Atorvastatin induced minor anti-inflammatory effects and minor effects on lipids during a 6-month treatment period.

Disease mutations reveal residues critical to the interaction of P4-ATPases with lipid substrates.

Phospholipid flippases (P4-ATPases) translocate specific phospholipids from the exoplasmic to the cytoplasmic leaflet of membranes. While there is good evidence that the overall molecular structure of flippases is similar to that of P-type ATPase ion-pumps, the transport pathway for the "giant" lipid substrate has not been determined. ATP8A2 is a flippase with selectivity toward phosphatidylserine (PS), possessing a net negatively charged head group, whereas ATP8B1 exhibits selectivity toward the electrically neutral phosphatidylcholine (PC). Setting out to elucidate the functional consequences of flippase disease mutations, we have identified residues of ATP8A2 that are critical to the interaction with the lipid substrate during the translocation process. Among the residues pinpointed are I91 and L308, which are positioned near proposed translocation routes through the protein. In addition we pinpoint two juxtaposed oppositely charged residues, E897 and R898, in the exoplasmic loop between transmembrane helices 5 and 6. The glutamate is conserved between PS and PC flippases, whereas the arginine is replaced by a negatively charged aspartate in ATP8B1. Our mutational analysis suggests that the glutamate repels the PS head group, whereas the arginine minimizes this repulsion in ATP8A2, thereby contributing to control the entry of the phospholipid substrate into the translocation pathway.