PD-1 inhibitor combined with chemotherapy for first-line treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients with distant metastasis: a real-world retrospective study.

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the efficacy and safety of PD-1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) with distant metastasis in the real world are as effective and safe as in clinical trials. Patients and methods: From July 2019 to July 2023, a total of 422 patients with distant metastasis of ESCC were included and divided into the PD-1 inhibitor combined chemotherapy group (PC group) and the chemotherapy alone group (C group) according to the treatment regimen. There were 278 patients in the PC group and 144 patients in the C group. The primary endpoint of this study was progression-free survival (PFS), while secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) of the PC group were 44.60% (124/278) and 91.00% (253/278), respectively, which were 18.9% and 3.5% higher than those of the C group. The median PFS and median OS of the PC group were significantly better than those of the C group (median PFS: 6.5 vs. 5.5 months, P < 0.001; median OS: 16.6 vs. 13.9 months, P = 0.002). Further univariate and multivariate Cox analysis showed that the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) score and the number of metastatic sites were potential predictors of PFS in PC patients. The combination of PD-1 inhibitors with cisplatin and paclitaxel (TP) was more beneficial for patients with PFS compared to the combination of cisplatin and fluorouracil (PF). Furthermore, the presence of bone metastasis, body mass index (BMI), and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LWR) before treatment may be potential predictive factors for patient OS. The adverse reactions that occurred in the PC group can be tolerated or alleviated after both prevention and active treatment. Conclusions: The combination of PD-1 inhibitors and chemotherapy as first-line treatment for ESCC patients with distant metastasis still has good efficacy and safety compared to clinical trials in the real world.

Efficacy and safety of sintilimab combined with apatinib as third-line or above therapy for patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer.

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of sintilimab and apatinib for the treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer (GC) and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer. This retrospective study analyzed data from 34 patients who had advanced or metastatic GC/GEJ cancer and received the combination therapy of sintilimab and apatinib as a third-line or above treatment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety. Among the 34 patients, none achieved a complete response (CR), 3 patients (8.8%) achieved a partial response, 23 patients (67.6%) had stable disease, and 8 patients (23.5%) experienced progressive disease. The ORR and DCR were 8.8% and 76.5%, respectively. The median PFS was 6.0 months (95% CI: 3.6-8.4), and the median OS was 11.6 months (95% CI: 8.1-15.1). Subgroup analysis revealed significant differences in OS between patients with high and low Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status scores and between patients with and without a history of gastrectomy. Common adverse events (AEs) during treatment included fatigue (52.9%), anemia (47.1%), leukopenia (26.5%), hypothyroidism (23.5%), nausea and vomiting (20.6%), neutropenia (20.6%), and thrombocytopenia (17.6%), most of which were grade 1 and 2 AEs. No deaths occurred due to AEs. These findings indicate that the combination of sintilimab and apatinib has a favorable therapeutic effect in patients with advanced GC. Moreover, the AEs associated with this therapy are generally manageable.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of third-line treatments for metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Background: The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different third-line treatment regimens for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) through a comprehensive analysis and network meta-analysis (NMA). Additionally, the study aims to provide guidance on selecting appropriate third-line systemic treatment regimens for patients with mCRC. Methods: We conducted a search of the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases from January 1, 2005, to May 20, 2023, to include phase II/III randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of third-line treatments for mCRC. The primary outcome assessed in the NMA was median overall survival (mOS), and other outcomes included median progression-free survival (mPFS), disease control rate (DCR), and grade 3 or higher adverse events (≥3AEs). Results: Ultimately, nine phase II/III RCTs involving five treatment regimens were included in this study. Trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) plus bevacizumab (hazard ratio [HR] 0.41, 95% credible interval [CrI] 0.32-0.52) was found to be the most effective treatment for mOS compared to best supportive care (BSC). TAS-102 plus bevacizumab also significantly improved mPFS compared to BSC (HR 0.20, 95% CrI 0.16-0.25). In terms of adverse events (AEs), TAS-102 (RR 0.52, 95% CrI 0.35-0.74) had a lower incidence of ≥3AEs compared to fruquintinib, but fruquintinib (RR 1.79, 95% CrI 1.10-3.11) showed better improvement in DCR than TAS-102. Subgroup analysis using the Bayesian surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) ranked the regimens based on the OS benefit. The results indicated that TAS-102 plus bevacizumab ranked first across age, gender, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), and time from initial diagnosis of metastatic disease to randomization. Conclusion: TAS-102, fruquintinib, TAS-102 plus bevacizumab, the regorafenib standard dose regimen (regorafenib), and the regorafenib dose-escalation regimen (regorafenib 80+) all demonstrated improved OS and PFS compared to BSC in mCRC patients. However, TAS-102 plus bevacizumab may be the optimal choice for third-line treatment in mCRC patients. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php, CRD42023434929.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced myocarditis with myasthenia gravis overlap syndrome: A case report and literature review.

RATIONALE: The therapeutic value of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in a variety of tumors has been found and recognized, and although ICIs have improved the prognosis of many patients with advanced tumors, these drugs sometimes cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs). PATIENT CONCERNS: We report a 67-year-old woman with advanced rectal endocrine tumor. Ten days after receiving two cycles of treatment with camrelizumab combined with http://www.baidu.com/link?url=shAWG4LYTwwBcZAEb6pLb6DkDndJR2tUgOfFiWAkOf0hS-_sj2jjSLBwYaxSiHY3r6yPj31Lp2DCP-7q3w7ho5HIV46V4fbIShFyUY7Cbka sorafenib, the patient suddenly suffered from chest tightness, shortness of breath and progressive aggravation of limb weakness, the high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) was elevated to 3015pg/mL and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) up to 5671pg/mL, and creatine kinase (CK) was 1419U/L. DIAGNOSIS AND INTERVENTIONS: The patient was diagnosed as immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced myocarditis with myasthenia gravis overlap syndrome. The patient was transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU) in time and given oxygen inhalation, glucocorticoids, immunoglobulin and anticholinesterase drugs, and other related treatments. OUTCOMES: After 2 weeks, the symptoms of myasthenia gravis (MG) were relieved, and the level of myocardial injury markers decreased significantly, but it was still at a high level. The patient's family refused further treatment, and the patient died soon after. LESSONS: In this paper, Through the report and follow-up analysis of this case, this paper recognizes that the early correct understanding and evaluation of this fulminant and fatal irAEs and the reasonable treatment of patients are very important for the prognosis of patients.