Using Self-Regulated Learning Microanalysis to Examine Regulatory Processes in Clerkship Students Engaged in Practice Questions.

Introduction: Self-regulated learning is a cyclical process of forethought, performance, and self-reflection that has been used as an assessment tool in medical education. No prior studies have evaluated SRL processes for answering multiple-choice questions (MCQs) and most evaluated one or two iterations of a non-MCQ task. SRL assessment during MCQs may elucidate reasons why learners are successful or not on these questions that are encountered repeatedly during medical education. Methods: Internal medicine clerkship students at three institutions participated in a SRL microanalytic protocol that targeted strategic planning, metacognitive monitoring, causal attributions, and adaptive inferences across seven MCQs. Responses were transcribed and coded according to previously published methods for microanalytic protocols. Results: Forty-four students participated. In the forethought phase, students commonly endorsed prioritizing relevant features as their diagnostic strategy (n = 20, 45%) but few mentioned higher-order diagnostic reasoning processes such as integrating clinical information (n = 5, 11%) or comparing/contrasting diagnoses (n = 0, 0%). However, in the performance phase, students' metacognitive processes included high frequencies of integration (n = 38, 86%) and comparing/contrasting (n = 24, 55%). In the self-reflection phase, 93% (n = 41) of students faulted their management reasoning and 84% (n = 37) made negative references to their abilities. Less than 10% (n = 4) of students indicated that they would adapt their diagnostic reasoning process for these questions. Discussion: This study describes in detail student self-regulatory processes during MCQs. We found that students engaged in higher-order diagnostic reasoning processes but were not explicit about it and seldom reflected critically on these processes after selecting an incorrect answer. Self-reflections focused almost exclusively on management reasoning and negative references to abilities which may decrease self-efficacy. Encouraging students to identify and evaluate diagnostic reasoning processes and make attributions to controllable factors may improve performance.

The dialysis orders objective structured clinical examination (OSCE): a formative assessment for nephrology fellows.

BACKGROUND: Few quantitative nephrology-specific simulations assess fellow competency. We describe the development and initial validation of a formative objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) assessing fellow competence in ordering acute dialysis. METHODS: The three test scenarios were acute continuous renal replacement therapy, chronic dialysis initiation in moderate uremia and acute dialysis in end-stage renal disease-associated hyperkalemia. The test committee included five academic nephrologists and four clinically practicing nephrologists outside of academia. There were 49 test items (58 points). A passing score was 46/58 points. No item had median relevance less than 'important'. The content validity index was 0.91. Ninety-five percent of positive-point items were easy-medium difficulty. Preliminary validation was by 10 board-certified volunteers, not test committee members, a median of 3.5 years from graduation. The mean score was 49 [95% confidence interval (CI) 46-51], κ = 0.68 (95% CI 0.59-0.77), Cronbach's α = 0.84. RESULTS: We subsequently administered the test to 25 fellows. The mean score was 44 (95% CI 43-45); 36% passed the test. Fellows scored significantly less than validators (P < 0.001). Of evidence-based questions, 72% were answered correctly by validators and 54% by fellows (P = 0.018). Fellows and validators scored least well on the acute hyperkalemia question. In self-assessing proficiency, 71% of fellows surveyed agreed or strongly agreed that the OSCE was useful. CONCLUSIONS: The OSCE may be used to formatively assess fellow proficiency in three common areas of acute dialysis practice. Further validation studies are in progress.

Assessment of racial disparities in chronic kidney disease stage 3 and 4 care in the department of defense health system.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Racial disparities in provision of healthcare are widespread in the United States but have not been specifically assessed in provision of chronic kidney disease (CKD) care. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of the clinical database used in a Department of Defense (DOD) medical system. Beneficiaries studied were DOD-eligible beneficiaries with CKD stage 3 (n = 7729) and 4 (n = 589) using the modified Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD)-estimated GFR formula but requiring manual correction for Black race. Compliance with selected Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) CKD recommended targets (monitoring of recommended laboratory data, prescription of recommended medications, and referral to nephrology) was assessed over a 12-mo period, stratified by CKD stage. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess whether race (White, Black, or other) was independently associated with provider compliance with targets, adjusted for demographic factors and burden of comorbid conditions. RESULTS: Among the targets, only monitoring of LDL cholesterol was significantly less common among Blacks. For all other measures, compliance was either not significantly different or significantly higher for Black compared with White beneficiaries. However, patients categorized as "Other" race were in general less likely to achieve targets than Whites, and at stage 3 CKD significantly less likely to achieve targets for monitoring of phosphorous, hemoglobin, and vitamin D. CONCLUSIONS: In the DOD health system, provider compliance with selected CKD stage 3 and 4 targets was not significantly lower for Black beneficiaries than for Whites, with the exception of LDL cholesterol monitoring. Patients classified as Other race were generally less likely to achieve targets than Whites, in some patients significantly so.

Body mass index and peritoneal dialysis: "exceptions to the exception" in reverse epidemiology?

Until recently, it was not apparent whether apparent paradoxical associations of body mass index (BMI), lipids, and blood pressure with survival observed in hemodialysis (HD) patients, which contradict observations from the general population, also applied to peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Studies of survival in PD patients must account for differences in adjusted survival relative to HD patients, namely, early equivalent to superior survival, but after about 1-2 years, inferior survival. Several recent observational studies have analyzed the association between BMI and survival in PD patients from different perspectives and using different patient populations. In general, these studies found that any survival advantage associated with obesity is significantly less likely in PD than HD patients. Among PD patients, those who are obese can be said to have equivalent survival to PD patients with normal BMI. Studies of lipids and blood pressure in PD patients also yield conflicting associations with survival. Obese patients, especially if diabetic, may have increased risk of death after starting on PD compared to HD, although firm conclusions are premature given the limitations of current evidence. At present, the levels of lipids and blood pressure which are best associated with survival in PD patients are not well-defined.

Association of oral sodium phosphate purgative use with acute kidney injury.

Oral sodium phosphate (OSP) is a commonly used purgative before colonoscopy. There have been numerous reports of acute phosphate nephropathy attributed to the use of OSP. This study evaluated the association between the use of OSP and acute kidney injury (AKI) in an observational, retrospective, cohort study. Of 9799 patients who underwent colonoscopy and had serum creatinine values recorded within 365 days before and after the procedure, AKI, defined as > or =50% increase in baseline serum creatinine, was identified in 114 (1.16%). After adjustment for significant covariates in a multiple logistic regression model, the use of OSP was associated with increased risk for AKI (odds ratio 2.35; 95% confidence interval 1.51 to 3.66; P < 0.001) with an adjusted number need to harm of 81. Age was also independently associated with AKI in this cohort; therefore, until larger, prospective studies define the population at risk for acute phosphate nephropathy, the use of polyethylene glycol-based purgatives should be considered for older patients and possibly for those with comorbid medical conditions.