An Inflammation-Associated Prognosis Model for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Based on Adenylate Uridylate- (AU-) Rich Element Genes.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a typical inflammation-driven cancer and ranks sixth in the incidence rate worldwide. The role of adenylate uridylate- (AU-) rich element genes (AREGs) in HCC remains unclear. HCC-related datasets were acquired from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Differentially expressed AREGs (DE-AREGs) between HCC samples and healthy controls were identified. The univariate Cox and LASSO analyses were performed to determine the prognostic genes. Furthermore, a signature and corresponding nomogram were configured for the clinical prediction of HCC. The potential signature-related biological significance was explored using functional and pathway enrichment analysis. Additionally, immune infiltration analysis was also performed. Finally, the expression of prognostic genes was verified using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). A total of 189 DE-AREGs between normal and HCC samples were identified, wherein CENPA, TXNRD1, RABIF, UGT2B15, and SERPINE1 were selected to generate an AREG-related signature. Moreover, the prognostic accuracy of the AREG-related signature was also confirmed. Functional analysis indicated that the high-risk score was related to various functions and pathways. Inflammation and immune-related analyses indicated that the difference of T cell and B cell receptor abundance, microvascular endothelial cells (MVE), lymphatic endothelial cells (lye), pericytes, stromal cells, and the six immune checkpoints was statistically significant between the different risk groups. Similarly, RT-qPCR outcomes of these signature genes were also significant. In conclusion, an inflammation-associated signature based on five DE-AREGs was constructed, which could act as a prognostic indicator of patients with HCC.

Can Melatonin Improve the Osteopenia of Perimenopausal and Postmenopausal Women? A Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness and safety of melatonin for perimenopausal and postmenopausal women with osteopenia. METHODS: In this meta-analysis, data from randomized controlled trials were obtained to assess the effects of melatonin versus placebo or western medicine in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women with osteopenia. The study's registration number is CRD42018086238. The primary outcomes included bone mineral density (BMD) and T-score. RESULT: From 551 articles retrieved, three trials involving 121 patients were included. Due to the high-to-substantial heterogeneity (BMD: I2=96.9%, P=0.000; T-score: I2=74.9%, and P=0.019), the statistical analysis of BMD and T-score was abandoned. A systematic review was undergone for the two outcomes. Compared with the control group, melatonin may increase osteocalcin (WMD 4.97; 95% CI 3.14, 6.79; P < 0.00001). CONCLUSION: Based on current evidence, melatonin might be used as a safe nutritional supplement to improve bone density in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women, but its efficacy needs to be further affirmed.