Changes in scleral exposure following modified Le Fort III osteotomy.

OBJECTIVE: The Kufner modified Le Fort III osteotomy (LFIII) can be used to address midface deficiency, which is often accompanied by excessive scleral exposure. The purpose of this project is to analyze the changes in scleral exposure after a LFIII. METHODS: Thirteen patients with midface hypoplasia were treated with LFIII. Scleral surface area (SSA) was determined by pixel count and the distance from the inferior eyelid margin to the center of the pupil (MED) was measured pre- and postoperatively. Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated to assess measurement reliability and repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) were determined to assess systematic difference among the replicates. RESULTS: The interquartile range for change in SSA ranged from -31% to -7%, median 20% (P = .002) and the interquartile range for change in MED ranged from -21% to -12%, median -18% (P = .0002). CONCLUSIONS: SSA and MED can be reliably determined using the aforementioned method. The LFIII decreases scleral exposure.

Changes over time in the prevalence of caries experience or periodontal pathology on third molars in young adults.

PURPOSE: To assess the prevalence of caries experience and periodontal pathology on third molar teeth compared with first and second molars and teeth more anterior from subjects who had data collected over time in a longitudinal clinical study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Healthy subjects with 4 asymptomatic third molars and data for at least 4 years after enrollment were included in these analyses. The presence or absence of caries experience on the occlusal surface of the third molars and any surface of the first or second molars was assessed using a visual-tactile caries examination. Full mouth periodontal probing, 6 sites per tooth, was conducted as a measure of clinical periodontal status. The primary outcome measures were at least 1 periodontal probing depth of at least 4 mm versus none, and caries experience versus no caries experience. The prevalence of caries experience and periodontal pathologic findings at follow-up and the relationship of the occurrence between the third molars and teeth more anterior in the mouth were examined using McNemar's statistics. RESULTS: The follow-up was a median of 6.9 years (interquartile range 4.6 to 7.7 years) for 179 subjects, with a mean age of 29 years. More subjects were female (54%) and white (80%). At follow-up, 85% of the subjects had caries experience detected on the first or second molars, and only 50% had a third molar affected. In contrast, at follow-up, the presence of at least 1 periodontal probing depth of at least 4 mm was marginally more prevalent on the third molars than on the first or second molars (56% and 50%, respectively). Fewer subjects had third molars free of caries experience and periodontal pathology at follow-up compared with at enrollment (28% versus 38%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of both third molar caries experience and third molar periodontal pathology increased from baseline to the follow-up examination. At follow-up, the prevalence of caries experience was greater on the first or second molars than on the third molars, and periodontal pathology were greater on the third molars than on the more anterior teeth.

Prevalence of third molars with caries experience or periodontal pathology in young adults.

PURPOSE: We assessed the prevalence of caries experience and periodontal pathology on asymptomatic third molars in young adults. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Healthy subjects with 4 asymptomatic third molars were enrolled in an institutional review board-approved study during a 5-year period. Full mouth periodontal probing, 6 sites per tooth, was the measure of clinical periodontal status. The presence or absence of occlusal caries experience (carious lesions or restorations, including sealants) on third molars and on any surface of the first and second molars were assessed using a visual-tactile examination and panoramic radiographs. The primary outcome measures were at least 1 periodontal probing depth of at least 4 mm versus none and caries experience versus no caries experience. RESULTS: The data were analyzed from 409 subjects, who averaged 25 years old. More subjects were female (53%) and white (76%). More subjects had at least 1 periodontal probing depth of 4 mm or deeper on a third molar (55%) than on the distal of a second molar (46%). These findings were more likely to be detected around a third molar in subjects with all third molars at the occlusal plane (72%) than in subjects with at least one third molar below (33%). Overall, fewer subjects were affected by third molar caries experience than first or second molars (24% vs 73%, respectively). Of the subset of subjects with all four third molars at the occlusal plane, 26% were affected by both third molar periodontal pathology and caries experience and 16% were caries and periodontal pathology free. CONCLUSIONS: In these cross-sectional analyses, periodontal pathology was detected more frequently on third molars than on first and second molars and caries experience was detected more frequently on first and second molars than on third molars.

Prevalence of visible third molars with caries experience or periodontal pathology in middle-aged and older Americans.

PURPOSE: To assess the prevalence of periodontal pathology and caries experience in visible third molars, as well as the relationship of these findings to periodontal pathology and caries experience in teeth more anterior in the mouth. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were from 6,793 Dental Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities participants who underwent a clinical examination for periodontal disease and coronal caries experience and who retained at least 1 visible third molar. Outcome variables were the detection of periodontal pathology or coronal caries experience on visible third molars and on teeth more anterior in the mouth (non-third molars). Periodontal probing depths at least 4 mm (PD4+) and clinical attachment levels at least 3 mm (CAL3+) were indicator variables for periodontal pathology. At least 1 carious/decayed coronal surface or filled coronal surface was an indicator variable for caries experience. Outcomes for third molar and non-third molar teeth were compared by descriptive statistics and χ(2) tests with statistical significance set at P < .05. RESULTS: A third of the 6,793 Dental Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities subjects, who averaged 62 years of age, had at least 1 visible third molar. Subjects were more likely to have at least 1 third molar CAL3+ as compared with at least 1 third molar PD4+: 78% versus 61%. PD4+ and CAL3+ were significantly more prevalent among non-third molars as compared with third molars (P < .01). Most subjects, 73%, had restorations on visible third molars and non-third molars, and over two-thirds of subjects had a visible third molar with caries experience and periodontal pathology. Fewer than 2% of subjects had third molars free of caries experience or periodontal pathology. CONCLUSIONS: Most subjects had clinical evidence of caries experience or periodontal pathology on visible third molars; few subjects had visible third molars that were disease free. Subjects with periodontal pathology or caries experience on third molars were significantly more likely to have these findings detected on teeth more anterior in the mouth.