Indication for Computed Tomography Scan in Shoulder Instability: Sensitivity and Specificity of Standard Radiographs to Predict Bone Defects After Traumatic Anterior Glenohumeral Instability.

BACKGROUND: Quantifying glenohumeral bone loss is key in preoperative surgical planning for a successful Bankart repair. HYPOTHESIS: Simple radiographs can accurately measure bone defects in cases of recurrent shoulder instability. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: A true anteroposterior (AP) view, alone and in combination with an axillary view, was used to evaluate the diagnostic properties of radiographs compared with computed tomography (CT) scan, the current gold standard, to predict significant bone defects in 70 patients. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were evaluated and compared. RESULTS: Detection of glenoid bone loss on plain film radiographs, with and without axillary view, had a sensitivity of 86% for both views and a specificity of 73% and 64% with and without the axillary view, respectively. For detection of humeral bone loss, the sensitivity was 8% and 17% and the specificity was 98% and 91% with and without the axillary view, respectively. Regular radiographs would have missed 1 instance of significant bone loss on the glenoid side and 20 on the humeral side. Interobserver reliabilities were moderate for glenoid detection (κ = 0.473-0.503) and poor for the humeral side (κ = 0.278-0.336). CONCLUSION: Regular radiographs showed suboptimal sensitivity, specificity, and reliability. Therefore, CT scan should be considered in the treatment algorithm for accurate quantification of bone loss to prevent high rates of recurrent instability.

Measurement of combined glenoid and Hill-Sachs lesions in anterior shoulder instability.

BACKGROUND: Recurrent glenohumeral anterior instability (RGAI) frequently induces combined glenoid and Hill-Sachs bone lesions and is a risk factor for soft tissue repair failure. This cohort study describes a simple preoperative quantification method for bone loss, the Clock method, the first that combines glenoid and humeral lesions. METHODS: Computed tomography scans of 34 shoulders with RGAI were twice reviewed by three independent observers, who measured bone lesions using the new Clock method and existing validated methods. Intra- and inter-observer reliability of the Clock method was evaluated (intraclass correlation coefficient). Pearson correlation was used to correlate Clock method with existing methods, and with function (Western Ontario Shoulder Instability, Quick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand). RESULTS: Thirty-two patients met the inclusion criteria: three females and 29 males, mean age 28 years. The intra- and inter-observer reliability was excellent, with intraclass correlation coefficient ranging from 0.817 to 0.938 for the novel Clock method. Humeral Clock and Glenoid Clock strongly correlated with Humeral Ratio (r = 0.882, p < 0.001) and Glenoid Surface Area and Glenoid Ratio (r = 0.793 and 0.717, p < 0.001), respectively. The classic threshold of 25% of the glenoid diameter with the Glenoid Ratio method corresponds to 4 hours with the Glenoid Clock method. CONCLUSIONS: The Clock method is quick and reliable, with more studies being needed to investigate whether it is correlated with surgical outcomes.