Usefulness of Malachite-Green LAMP for Diagnosis of Plasmodium and Five Human Malaria Species in a Nonendemic Setting.

Molecular methods are necessary to detect low-density malaria infections. The purpose of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of six malachite-green loop-mediated amplification method (MG-LAMP) assays (MG-LAMP-Pf, MG-LAMP-Pv, MG-LAMP-Po, MG-LAMP-Pm, MG-LAMP-Pk, and MG-LAMP-Pspp) for the species-specific detection of each human Plasmodium, including P. knowlesi, and the Plasmodium genus compared with the nested-multiplex malaria polymerase chain reaction (NM-PCR), using 161 malaria-positive and 274 malaria-negative samples. MG-LAMP-Pspp assay detected the five human Plasmodium species and each species-specific MG-LAMP assay detected only its corresponding species. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of MG-LAMP assays, compared with NM-PCR, were > 90%, except in the case of the MG-LAMP-Pm assay, which dropped to 47%. Limit of detection for MG-LAMP-Pspp assay ranged from 0.1 parasites/µL for P. falciparum to 16.9 parasites/µL for P. malariae samples, and it was similar for the rest of MG-LAMP assays except for the MG-LAMP-Pm assay. Turnaround time was estimated to be 2 hours and 35 minutes for one MG-LAMP assay and 4 hours and 15 minutes if all species-specific MG-LAMP is set up, whereas for the NM-PCR, turnaround time was ∼6 hours and 15 minutes. Costs per determination ranged from 1 to 6 euros for MG-LAMP assays and 5 euros for NM-PCR. Therefore, MG-LAMP assays appear to have good concordance compared with the reference method, except for the MG-LAMP-Pm assay. They can detect low parasitemia and identify malaria species, with lower costs and shorter time to obtain results, and they are suitable tools to be used in endemic and non-endemic countries for malaria detection.

Assessment of Commercial Real-Time PCR Assays for Detection of Malaria Infection in a Non-Endemic Setting.

Malaria control and elimination require prompt diagnosis and accurate treatment. Conventional methods such as rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) and microscopy lack the characteristics to detect low parasitemias, commonly found in asymptomatic parasitemias and/or submicroscopic malaria carriers. On the contrary, molecular methods have higher sensitivity and specificity. This study evaluated the performance of two commercial real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays, RealStar® Malaria PCR (RealStar-genus) and RealStar Malaria Screen&Type PCR (RealStar-species), compared with the reference Nested Multiplex Malaria PCR, for the detection of the main five Plasmodium species affecting humans. A total of 121 samples were evaluated. Values of sensitivity (98.9% and 97.8%) and specificity (100% and 96.7%) of the RealStar-genus and the RealStar-species assays, respectively, were very good. The limit of detection (LoD) for the RealStar-genus assay showed a mean value of 0.28 parasites/µL with Plasmodium falciparum samples; while, the LoD of the RealStar-species assay ranged from 0.09 parasites/µL for P. vivax to two parasites/µL for P. ovale. The time to complete a diagnosis was established in 4 hours. Our findings showed a very good concordance of both assays compared with the reference method, with a very good analytical sensitivity. RealStar-species assay was able to correctly characterize double and triple infections. Therefore, these RealStar assays have shown to be useful tools in malaria diagnosis in non-endemic countries and even endemic countries, and for malaria control in general, detecting low parasitemias with sensitivity similar to the most sensitive methods as nested PCR, but with lower time to get the results.