Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicentric, phase IIA clinical trial for evaluating the safety, tolerability, and therapeutic efficacy of daily oral administration of NFX88 to treat neuropathic pain in individuals with spinal cord injury.

STUDY DESIGN: Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group multicentric phase IIA clinical trial. OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and tolerability of oral administration of NFX-88 in subjects with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) and explore its efficacy in pain control. SETTING: A total of 7 spinal cord injury rehabilitation units in Spain. METHODS: A total of 61 adult with traumatic complete or incomplete spinal cord injury (C4-T12 level), were randomised 1:1:1:1 to a placebo, NFX88 1.05 g, 2.1 g, 4.2 g/day for up to 12 weeks. The placebo or NFX-88 was administered as add-on therapy to pre-existing pregabalin (150-300 mg per day). Safety and tolerability were evaluated, and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was the primary measure to explore the efficacy of NFX-88 in pain control. RESULTS: No severe treatment-related adverse effects were reported for any of the four study groups. 44 SCI individuals completed the study and were analysed. The data obtained from the VAS analysis and the PainDETECT Questionnaire (PD-Q) suggested that the combination of NFX88 with pregabalin is more effective than pregabalin with placebo at reducing neuropathic pain (NP) in individuals with SCI and that the dose 2.10 g/day causes the most dramatic pain relief. CONCLUSIONS: NFX88 treatment was found to be highly safe and well tolerated, with the dose of 2.10 g/day being the most effective at causing pain relief. Thus, the promising efficacy of this first-in-class lipid mediator deserves further consideration in future clinical trials.

Preventive treatment with alendronate of loss of bone mineral density in acute traumatic spinal cord injury. Randomized controlled clinical trial.

STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled clinical trial of two parallel groups. OBJECTIVES: Analyse the efficacy of primary prevention with alendronate on the loss of bone mass which occurs during the first year of traumatic SCI, measured by double-energy X-ray bone densitometry (DXA). SETTING: National Hospital for Paraplegics (HNP), Toledo, Spain. METHODS: We included 52 people admitted to the HNP with traumatic SCI Grade A and B on the ASIA Impairment Scale and less than 8 weeks of progression, which were randomized to one of the two treatment groups. Both groups received calcifediol and a calcium-enriched diet for 52 weeks. Only one group was administered alendronate 70 mg weekly. The dose of alendronate was adjusted according to changes in serum ß-CTX. RESULTS: 52 Participants were randomized. Of the 26 assigned to each group, 4 patients were lost in the alendronate group and 3 in the control group. The random distribution of women was asymmetrical, so we analysed the effect of treatment on men. In the total left hip, the mean (SD) decrease in bone mass was -22.791% (10.768) in the control group compared to the mean (SD) decrease of -2.693% (6.283) in the same location in the alendronate group (p < 0.0001). No patient presented related adverse events. CONCLUSION: Alendronate administered for one year in the first 8 weeks after traumatic SCI decreases bone loss in the hip in men. This treatment is well tolerated.

Phase II/III placebo-controlled randomized trial of safety and efficacy of growth hormone treatment in incomplete chronic traumatic spinal cord injury.

STUDY DESIGN: This is a double blind phase II/III placebo-controlled randomized trial of the safety and efficacy of GH treatment in incomplete chronic traumatic spinal cord injury. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the possibility to use exogenous GH administration for motor recovery in chronic traumatic incomplete human SCI. The objectives were to establish safety and efficacy of a combined treatment of subcutaneous GH (or placebo) and rehabilitation in this population. SETTING: Hospital Nacional de Parapléjicos METHODS: The pharmacological treatment was a subcutaneous daily dose of growth hormone (GH, Genotonorm 0.4 mg, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals) or placebo for one year. The pharmacological treatment was performed, during the first six months under hospitalization and supervised rehabilitation. RESULTS: The main findings were that the combined treatment of GH plus rehabilitation treatment is feasible and safe, and that GH but not placebo increases the ISNCSCI motor score. On the other hand, the motor-score increment was marginal (after one-year combined treatment, the mean increment of the motor-score was around 2.5 points). Moreover, we found that intensive and long-lasting rehabilitation program per se increases the functional outcome of SCI individuals (measured using SCIM III and WISCI II). CONCLUSIONS: It is important to highlight that our aim was to propose GH as a possible treatment to improve motor functions in incomplete SCI individuals. At least with the doses we used, we think that the therapeutic effects of this approach are not clinically relevant in most subjects with SCI.