¿Cuáles son los conflictos éticos más frecuentes para los internistas españoles? / Which are the most prevalent ethical conflicts for Spanish internists?

Antecedentes y objetivo Los clínicos se enfrentan en su práctica diaria a multitud de conflictos éticos. No hay estudios sobre los tipos de conflictos éticos que se encuentran con más frecuencia y que preocupan más a los clínicos en España. El objetivo de este estudio es describir los conflictos éticos más frecuentes con los que se encuentran los internistas españoles, así como la importancia que los profesionales atribuyen a cada conflicto. Materiales y métodos Estudio observacional transversal a través de una encuesta voluntaria y anónima, dirigida a médicos internistas españoles y distribuida a través de una plataforma ad hoc de la Sociedad Española de Medicina Interna. Resultados Los problemas éticos más frecuentes y relevantes para los internistas españoles son los relacionados con: el final de la vida (decisiones de limitación del esfuerzo terapéutico, uso de tratamientos paliativos, instauración de órdenes de no reanimación cardiopulmonar); los conflictos que se producen en el seno de la relación clínica, bien con familiares o con pacientes, y la toma de decisiones con pacientes incompetentes. Estos resultados son similares a los de otras series anglosajonas y europeas. Los problemas éticos dificultan más la actividad asistencial a los clínicos que perciben con más frecuencia dichos problemas (50,3%) que los que no los perciben (16%). Conclusiones Los conflictos éticos más frecuentes y relevantes entre los internistas españoles son los relacionados con el manejo del final de la vida, seguidos de los derivados de la relación clínica y el manejo de pacientes incompetentes. Es prioritario diseñar programas de formación que permitan abordar y reconocer mejor dichos problemas (AU)

Background and objective Clinicians face a multitude of ethical conflicts in their daily practice. There have been no studies on the types of ethical conflicts encountered most frequently and that are of most concern to clinicians in Spain. The aim of this study is to report the most common ethical conflicts faced by Spanish internists, as well as the importance that the practitioners attribute to each conflict. Materials and Methods Our observational cross-sectional study employed a voluntary and anonymous survey aimed at Spanish medical internists and distributed through an ad hoc platform of the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine. Results The most common and relevant ethical issues for Spanish internists are related to patients’ end of life (decisions limiting therapeutic effort, use of palliative treatments, the establishment of do-not-resuscitate orders), the conflicts arising within the doctor-patient/family relationship, and making decisions with noncompetent patients. These results are similar to those of other English and European series. The ethical problems further complicate the healthcare activity of clinicians who more often notice these problems (50.3%) than those who do not notice them (16%). Conclusions The most common and relevant ethical conflicts among Spanish internists are related to managing patients’ end of life, followed by those related to the doctor-patient relationship and the management of noncompetent patients. It is essential that training programs be designed to better address and recognise these problems (AU)

Which are the most prevalent ethical conflicts for Spanish internists?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Clinicians face a multitude of ethical conflicts in their daily practice. There have been no studies on the types of ethical conflicts encountered most frequently and that are of most concern to clinicians in Spain. The aim of this study is to report the most common ethical conflicts faced by Spanish internists, as well as the importance that the practitioners attribute to each conflict. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our observational cross-sectional study employed a voluntary and anonymous survey aimed at Spanish medical internists and distributed through an ad hoc platform of the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine. RESULTS: The most common and relevant ethical issues for Spanish internists are related to patients' end of life (decisions limiting therapeutic effort, use of palliative treatments, the establishment of do-not-resuscitate orders), the conflicts arising within the doctor-patient/family relationship, and making decisions with noncompetent patients. These results are similar to those of other English and European series. The ethical problems further complicate the healthcare activity of clinicians who more often notice these problems (50.3%) than those who do not notice them (16%). CONCLUSIONS: The most common and relevant ethical conflicts among Spanish internists are related to managing patients' end of life, followed by those related to the doctor-patient relationship and the management of noncompetent patients. It is essential that training programs be designed to better address and recognise these problems.

Do internists know what limitation of therapeutic effort means?

OBJECTIVES: To ascertain whether internists know what limitation of therapeutic effort (LTE) means and whether training in palliative care affects this understanding. METHODS: A survey was administered to Spanish internists on their knowledge of LTE and training in palliative care. RESULTS: A total of 273 respondents completed the survey (mean age, 42±12 years), 80.2% of whom were associates. Some 23.8% of the respondents identified the complete definition of LTE. The most frequently selected responses were "not starting an active treatment" (85.0%) and "withdrawing an active treatment" (65.9%). Forty-three percent of the respondents lacked training in palliative care, 73.3% considered their level of understanding to be good or very good, 62.3% stated that they became anxious when addressing planning for end-of-life care with a patient, and 81.3% stated that they had experienced some conflict with their LTE decisions. CONCLUSIONS: Only 1 of every 4 internists knew the proper definition of LTE, with no association with the level of training in palliative care.

¿Saben los internistas qué es la limitación del esfuerzo terapéutico? / Do internists know what limitation of therapeutic effort means?

Objetivos Averiguar si los internistas saben qué es la limitación del esfuerzo terapéutico (LET) y si la formación en cuidados paliativos condiciona dicho conocimiento. Métodos Encuesta a los internistas españoles sobre el conocimiento de la LET y la formación en cuidados paliativos. Resultados Se recibieron 273 encuestas; edad media de los que respondieron 42±12 años; el 80,2% eran adjuntos. El 23,8% identificó la definición completa de la LET; las opciones más escogidas fueron «no iniciar un tratamiento activo» (85,0%) y «retirar un tratamiento activo» (65,9%). El 43% carece de formación en cuidados paliativos, el 73,3% considera que su nivel de conocimiento es bueno o muy bueno, al 62,3% le genera ansiedad afrontar la planificación de cuidados al final de la vida con el paciente y el 81,3% ha tenido algún conflicto con sus decisiones de la LET. Conclusiones Solo 1 de cada 4internistas conoce bien la definición de la LET, sin asociación con el grado de formación en cuidados paliativos (AU)

Objectives To ascertain whether internists know what limitation of therapeutic effort (LTE) means and whether training in palliative care affects this understanding. Methods A survey was administered to Spanish internists on their knowledge of LTE and training in palliative care. Results A total of 273 respondents completed the survey (mean age, 42±12 years), 80.2% of whom were associates. Some 23.8% of the respondents identified the complete definition of LTE. The most frecuently selected responses were «not starting an active treatment»(85.0%) and «withdrawing an active treatment» (65.9%). Forty-three percent of the respondents lacked training in palliative care, 73.3% considered their level of understanding to be good or very good, 62.3% stated that they became anxious when addressing planning for end-of-life care with a patient, and 81.3% stated that they had experienced some conflict with their LTE decisions. Conclusions Only 1 of every 4 internists knew the proper definition of LTE, with no association with level of training in palliative care (AU)

Which are the most prevalent ethical conflicts for Spanish internists? / ¿Cuáles son los conflictos éticos más frecuentes para los internistas españoles?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Clinicians face a multitude of ethical conflicts in their daily practice. There have been no studies on the types of ethical conflicts encountered most frequently and that are of most concern to clinicians in Spain. The aim of this study is to report the most common ethical conflicts faced by Spanish internists, as well as the importance that the practitioners attribute to each conflict. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our observational cross-sectional study employed a voluntary and anonymous survey aimed at Spanish medical internists and distributed through an ad hoc platform of the Spanish Society of Internal Medicine. RESULTS: The most common and relevant ethical issues for Spanish internists are related to patients' end of life (decisions limiting therapeutic effort, use of palliative treatments, the establishment of do-not-resuscitate orders), the conflicts arising within the doctor-patient/family relationship, and making decisions with noncompetent patients. These results are similar to those of other English and European series. The ethical problems further complicate the healthcare activity of clinicians who more often notice these problems (50.3%) than those who do not notice them (16%). CONCLUSIONS: The most common and relevant ethical conflicts among Spanish internists are related to managing patients' end of life, followed by those related to the doctor-patient relationship and the management of noncompetent patients. It is essential that training programs be designed to better address and recognise these problems.

Do internists know what limitation of therapeutic effort means? / ¿Saben los internistas qué es la limitación del esfuerzo terapéutico?

OBJECTIVES: To ascertain whether internists know what limitation of therapeutic effort (LTE) means and whether training in palliative care affects this understanding. METHODS: A survey was administered to Spanish internists on their knowledge of LTE and the training in palliative care. RESULTS: A total of 273 respondents completed the survey (mean age, 42±12 years), 80.2% of whom were associates. Some 23.8% of the respondents identified the complete definition of LTE. The most often chosen responses were «not starting an active treatment¼(85.0%) and «withdrawing an active treatment¼ (65.9%). Forty-three percent of the respondents lacked training in palliative care, 73.3% considered their level of understanding to be good or very good, 62.3% stated that they became anxious when addressing the planning for end-of-life care with the patient, and 81.3% stated that they had had some conflict with their LTE decisions. CONCLUSIONS: Only 1 of every 4 internists knew the proper definition for LTE, with no association with the level of training in palliative care.

Limitación del esfuerzo terapéutico en pacientes hospitalizados en servicios de medicina interna / Limitation of therapeutic effort in patients hospitalised in departments of internal medicine

Introducción. Existe escasa información sobre la limitación del esfuerzo terapéutico (LET) en pacientes ingresados en unidades de hospitalización de medicina interna. Objetivos. Describir las pautas de LET indicadas en los servicios de medicina interna y las características de los pacientes que las reciben. Pacientes y métodos. Estudio observacional descriptivo y retrospectivo de 4 hospitales de la Comunidad de Madrid. Se recogieron datos demográficos, de comorbilidad y las órdenes de LET pautadas en todos los pacientes fallecidos en un periodo de 6 meses. Resultados. Se incluyeron 382 pacientes cuya edad media fue de 85±10 años; 204 eran mujeres (53,4%) y 222 (58,1%) procedían de su domicilio. El 51,1% eran enfermos terminales, el 43,2% tenían demencia moderada/grave y el 95,5% presentaban comorbilidad al menos moderada. En 318 pacientes (83,7%) se realizó algún tipo de LET, siendo las más frecuentes las órdenes de «no reanimación cardiopulmonar» (292 enfermos, 76,4%; IC 95%: 72,1-80,8), «no usar medidas agresivas» (113 pacientes, 16,4%; IC 95%: 13,7-19,4) y «no ingresar en unidad de cuidados intensivos» (102 casos, 14,8%; IC 95%: 12,3-17,7). Conclusiones. La LET es muy frecuente en los pacientes que fallecen en medicina interna. Las pautas más utilizadas son «no reanimación cardiopulmonar» y la expresión poco concreta de «no usar medidas agresivas». Los pacientes son de edad avanzada, con importante comorbilidad, enfermedad terminal y demencia avanzada (AU)

Introduction. There is little information on the limitation of therapeutic effort (LTE) in patients admitted to hospital internal medicine units. Objectives. To describe the indicated LTE regimens in the departments of internal medicine and the characteristics of the patients who undergo them. Patients and methods. An observational, descriptive retrospective study was conducted on 4 hospitals of the Community of Madrid. The study collected demographic and comorbidity data and the LTE orders prescribed for all patients who died during a period of 6 months. Results. The study included 382 patients with a mean age of 85±10 years; 204 were women (53.4%) and 222 (58.1%) came from their homes. Some 51.1% of the patients were terminal, 43.2% had moderate to severe dementia, and 95.5% presented at least moderate comorbidity. Some type of LTE was performed in 318 patients (83.7%); the most common orders were «No cardiopulmonary resuscitation» (292 patients, 76.4%; 95% CI 72.1-80.8), «Do not use aggressive measures» (113 patients, 16.4%; 95% CI 13.7-19.4) and «Do not transfer to an intensive care unit» (102 cases, 14.8%, 95% CI 12.3-17.7). Some type of LTE was performed in 318 patients (83.7%); the most common orders were «No cardiopulmonary resuscitation» (292 patients, 76.4%; 95% CI 72.1-80.8), «Do not use aggressive measures» (113 patients, 16.4%; 95% CI 13.7-19.4) and «Do not transfer to an intensive care unit» (102 cases, 14.8%, 95% CI 12.3-17.7). Conclusions. LTE is common among patients who die in Internal Medicine. The most widely used regimens were «No CPR» and the unspecific statement «Do not use aggressive measures». The patients were elderly and had significant comorbidity, terminal illness and advanced dementia (AU)

Limitation of therapeutic effort in patients hospitalised in departments of internal medicine. / Limitación del esfuerzo terapéutico en pacientes hospitalizados en servicios de medicina interna.

INTRODUCTION: There is little information on the limitation of therapeutic effort (LTE) in patients admitted to hospital internal medicine units. OBJECTIVES: To describe the indicated LTE regimens in the departments of internal medicine and the characteristics of the patients who undergo them. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An observational, descriptive retrospective study was conducted on 4 hospitals of the Community of Madrid. The study collected demographic and comorbidity data and the LTE orders prescribed for all patients who died during a period of 6 months. RESULTS: The study included 382 patients with a mean age of 85±10 years; 204 were women (53.4%) and 222 (58.1%) came from their homes. Some 51.1% of the patients were terminal, 43.2% had moderate to severe dementia, and 95.5% presented at least moderate comorbidity. Some type of LTE was performed in 318 patients (83.7%); the most common orders were "No cardiopulmonary resuscitation" (292 patients, 76.4%; 95% CI 72.1-80.8), "Do not use aggressive measures" (113 patients, 16.4%; 95% CI 13.7-19.4) and "Do not transfer to an intensive care unit" (102 cases, 14.8%, 95% CI 12.3-17.7). Some type of LTE was performed in 318 patients (83.7%); the most common orders were "No cardiopulmonary resuscitation" (292 patients, 76.4%; 95% CI 72.1-80.8), "Do not use aggressive measures" (113 patients, 16.4%; 95% CI 13.7-19.4) and "Do not transfer to an intensive care unit" (102 cases, 14.8%, 95% CI 12.3-17.7). CONCLUSIONS: LTE is common among patients who die in Internal Medicine. The most widely used regimens were "No CPR" and the unspecific statement "Do not use aggressive measures". The patients were elderly and had significant comorbidity, terminal illness and advanced dementia.

Limitación del esfuerzo terapéutico en pacientes hospitalizados en el Servicio de Medicina Interna / Withholding and withdrawing treatment in patients admitted in an Internal Medicine ward

Introducción. Muchos pacientes ingresados en Medicina Interna presentan mala calidad de vida y/o mal pronóstico vital, por lo que son potenciales candidatos a limitación del esfuerzo terapéutico (LET). El objetivo primario consiste en describir qué medidas de LET se realizan en los pacientes fallecidos en un servicio de Medicina Interna de un hospital de Madrid. El secundario, la descripción del tipo de paciente en el que se realiza LET. Material y métodos. Estudio observacional durante 6 meses de 2011 y 2012. Se incluyeron todos los pacientes fallecidos en Medicina Interna. Resultados. Ingresaron 2.007 pacientes y fallecieron 211 (10,5%). Edad media 85 ± 9 años, el 57% (121) mujeres. Peso medio de los fallecidos 3,4. Ciento tres de los fallecidos (48,8%) provenía de residencia y 105 (49,8%) fueron considerados enfermos terminales. En 182 (86,3%; IC 95%: 81,4-91,1) se estableció durante el ingreso alguna orden de LET, en 99 (46,9%; IC 95%: 39,9-53,9) 2, y en 31 (14,7%; IC 95%: 9,6-19,7) 3 o más. Órdenes de LET más pautadas: «orden de no reanimación cardiopulmonar (154; 73%), no realización de «maniobras agresivas» (80; 38%), rechazo de antibioterapia (19; 9%), no ingreso en UCI (18; 8,5%) y no realización de cirugía (11; 5,2%). Conclusiones. La LET es una estrategia muy frecuente en los pacientes que fallecen en Medicina Interna. Las más frecuentes son la «orden de no reanimación cardiopulmonar» y la no realización de «medidas agresivas». Dichas órdenes se indican en pacientes de edad avanzada, con importante comorbilidad y alta incidencia de demencia y enfermedad terminal (AU)

Introduction. Many of the patients admitted to a general medical ward have a compromised quality of life, or short life expectancy, so they are potential candidates for withhold/withdraw (WH/WD) treatment. The first objectif was to describe which measures were WH/WD among patients who died during their admission in a general medical ward from a tertiary hospital in Madrid. Secondly, to define the clinical characteristics of this population. Material and methods. A cross-sectional descriptive study during 6 months from 2011 and 2012 of all the patients dead while their admission in the Internal Medicine Department. Results. 2007 patients were admitted, 211 died (10.5%). 121 (57%) were female, with 85 ± 9 years of mean age. 103 (48.8%) came from a residential facility and 105 fulfilled terminality criteria (49.8%). One decision to WH/WD treatment was made in 182 patients (86.3%, CI 95%: 81.4-91.1), two in 99 cases (46.9%, CI 95%: 39.9-53.9) and 3 or more in 31 subjects (14.7%, CI 95%: 9.6-19.7). The most frequent decisions involved do-not-resuscitate orders (154, 73.0%), rejection of «aggressive treatment measures» (80, 38.0%), use of antibiotics (19, 9.0%), admission in ICU (18, 8.5%), and/or surgical treatment (11, 5.2%). Conclusions. WH/WD treatment is very frequent among patients who died in a general medical ward. The most frequent involved do-not-resuscitate orders and rejection of «aggressive treatment measures». WH/WD decisions are adopted in an elderly population, with extensive comorbidity and an elevated prevalence of advanced dementia and/or terminal disease (AU)

[Withholding and withdrawing treatment in patients admitted in an Internal Medicine ward]. / Limitación del esfuerzo terapéutico en pacientes hospitalizados en el Servicio de Medicina Interna.

INTRODUCTION: Many of the patients admitted to a general medical ward have a compromised quality of life, or short life expectancy, so they are potential candidates for withhold/withdraw (WH/WD) treatment. The first objectif was to describe which measures were WH/WD among patients who died during their admission in a general medical ward from a tertiary hospital in Madrid. Secondly, to define the clinical characteristics of this population. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional descriptive study during 6 months from 2011 and 2012 of all the patients dead while their admission in the Internal Medicine Department. RESULTS: 2007 patients were admitted, 211 died (10.5%). 121 (57%) were female, with 85±9 years of mean age. 103 (48.8%) came from a residential facility and 105 fulfilled terminality criteria (49.8%). One decision to WH/WD treatment was made in 182 patients (86.3%, CI 95%: 81.4-91.1), two in 99 cases (46.9%, CI 95%: 39.9-53.9) and 3 or more in 31 subjects (14.7%, CI 95%: 9.6-19.7). The most frequent decisions involved do-not-resuscitate orders (154, 73.0%), rejection of «aggressive treatment measures¼ (80, 38.0%), use of antibiotics (19, 9.0%), admission in ICU (18, 8.5%), and/or surgical treatment (11, 5.2%). CONCLUSIONS: WH/WD treatment is very frequent among patients who died in a general medical ward. The most frequent involved do-not-resuscitate orders and rejection of «aggressive treatment measures¼. WH/WD decisions are adopted in an elderly population, with extensive comorbidity and an elevated prevalence of advanced dementia and/or terminal disease.

[Correlation between positive skin tests to molds, total IgE, and specific IgE using ELISA and mold cultures from the environment of the pediatric allergy patient]. / Correlación entre pruebas cutáneas positivas a hongos, IgE total, e IgE específica por ELISA y cultivos de hongos en el medio ambiente del paciente pediátrico alérgico.

The aim of this study was to made a correlation between allergic symptoms, positive skin prick test to fungi, total and specific IgE and mold culture in the patient's environmental. There were included 35 children (3-16 years), with skin prick test positive to fungi. The most frequent were: Rhizopus, Aspergillus, Cladosporium and Candida. Total and specific IgE were measured with ELISA, with titers high in 77.2% and 31.4% respectively. Fungal cultures were collected from dwellings and schools. The most frequently isolated mold genera were Cladosporium, Alternaria and Penicillium in the same proportion in both places: dwellings and schools. We concluded fungi are commonly found in children's environment.

[Levocabastine versus cetirizine for perennial allergic rhinitis in children]. / Levocabastina contra cetirizina en niños con rinitis alérgica perenne.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of levocabastine nasal spray asid cetirizine oral for the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis in children. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this randomized, prospective experimental, open clinical trial. We studied 30 children with ages between 6 and 16 years with perennial allergic rhinitis. Group 1, 17 subjects (7 female, 10 male) received cetirizine once daily, 5 mg children weientig less dian 30 k asid 10 mg in children weighing more trw' 30 k during 15 days. Group 2, 13 subjects (7 male, 6 female) received levocabastine 2 puffs BID on each nostril during tbe same time. A nasal symptoms score, nasal peal: flow vid eosinophils in a nasal smear were performed before and after treatment. RESULTS: There were no statistical differences in age, weight, height and arid duration of symptoms. Both groups showed improvement of symptoms via nasal peak flow with no differences between them (intergroup); nasal eosinophils remained unchanged. We for third statistical differences pre vid postreatment in each group (intragroup): Group 1, nasal congestion p = 0.002, ocular itch p = 0.01, sneezing p = 0.007, nasal secretion p = 0.01, nasal itch O = 0.009, total points O = 0.0005. Group 2, nasal congestion O = 0.02, ocular itch p = 0.05, sneezing p = 0.01, nasal secretion p = 0.01, nasal itch p = 0.04, total points p = 0.005. Significant differences were found in nasal peal' flow in Group 1 (p = 0.01) but no differences in eosinophils between file two groups. Side effects: 3 subjects in Group 1 (drowsiness, 1 appetite increase said 1 rhinorrea with epistaxis) vide 1 in Group 2 sensation of facial edema. CONCLUSION: Bofil drugs are effective the clinical relief of symptoms of perennial allergic rhinitis in children vied levocabastine has less side effects.

[Arterial oxygen saturation versus peak expiratory flow as predictive values in the course of asthmatic crises in children]. / Saturación arterial de oxígeno contra flujo espiratorio máximo como valores predictivos en la evolución de la crisis asmática en niños.

Asthmatic crisis is one of the most frequent urgencies in children. One of the most difficult decision for a physician is to determine what patient requires only ambulatory treatment and what patient needs hospital treatment. Many investigators have developed predictive scores, but to date conclusions are confusing. The purpose of the present study was to compare the value of arterial oxygen saturation versus peak expiratory flow rate measurements as predictors of the outcome of the asthmatic crisis in children. We performed a prospective, longitudinal, observational, comparative study in 50 children (30 males, 20 female), with ages between 6 and 18 years old, with the presence of a moderate asthmatic crisis. We measured arterial oxygen saturation and peak expiratory flow rate at the moment of their arrival to urgencies and at 30 minutes, 2, 4 and 24 hours after the administration of nebulized albuterol (100 mcg/k/dose). We found significant differences on baseline arterial oxygen saturation and the registrations taken at 2, 4, and 24 hours posttreatment (0.01), and we could only find significant differences between baseline peak expiratory flow rate and the registrations taken at 24 hours pretreatment. In conclusion arterial oxygen saturation is a better predictor than peak expiratory flow rate in the evolution of the asthmatic crisis in children.

[Early identification of respiratory viruses in asthmatic children]. / Identificación temprana de virus respiratorios en niños asmáticos.

The role of viral infections as a part of the environmental factors that triggered asthma in atopic subjects, their age specific pattern, as well as many risk factors for the development of subsequent wheezing are described. Some pathogenic mechanisms and their importance in the induction of airway inflammation are mentioned and early identification by laboratory tests in outlined for preventive approach and early antiinflammatory treatment.