Características de los pacientes con neoplasias hematológicas y con tumores sólidos atendidos por un equipo de soporte paliativo hospitalario / Characteristics of patients with hematological and solid tumors malignancies attended by a hospital palliative care service

Antecedentes y objetivo: El interés por la atención paliativa en pacientes con neoplasias hematológicas está aumentando. Nuestro objetivo es describir las características de pacientes oncológicos valorados por un equipo de soporte paliativo en un hospital terciario y analizar las diferencias entre pacientes hematológicos y con tumores sólidos. Método: Estudio observacional descriptivo longitudinal retrospectivo con una cohorte de pacientes hospitalizados con enfermedad oncológica (hematológica o tumor sólido) valorados por equipo de soporte paliativo hospitalario. Comparamos variables clínicas, asistenciales y de supervivencia. El análisis de datos se realizó con la versión 15 del programa SPSS. Resultados: De enero de 2015 a diciembre de 2018 se valoraron 1025 pacientes oncológicos (10,8 % hematológicos, 89,2 % sólidos). No se encontraron diferencias en situación funcional medida por la Palliative Performance Scale, presentación de síntoma principal, porcentaje de pacientes con dolor, tiempo de seguimiento ni en porcentaje de fallecidos en el ingreso en que fueron valorados. El paciente hematológico, comparado con el oncológico, tiene menos tratamiento opioide pautado (43 vs. 53 %; p = 0,035), es seguido con más frecuencia por recurso paliativo hospitalario que domiciliario (46,55 vs. 29,44 % el primero; 15,5 vs. 33,06 % el segundo; p = 0,001 en distribución) y fallece más en hospital (82,9 vs. 65,5 %; p = 0,024). Conclusiones: Los pacientes con neoplasia hematológica presentan una carga sintomática similar a los pacientes con tumor sólido. Es importante identificar mejor sus necesidades para que puedan beneficiarse, como se ha demostrado con los pacientes oncológicos, de la atención integrada junto a los servicios de hematología con modelos de intervención acordes a sus necesidades y las trayectorias específicas de las enfermedades hematológicas. (AU)

Background and objective: Interest in palliative care for patients with hematologic malignancies is increasing. Our goal is to describe the features of cancer patients evaluated by a supportive and palliative care service in a tertiary referral hospital, and to analyze the differences between patients with hematological malignancies and solid tumors. Method: A retrospective longitudinal descriptive observational study was carried out in a cohort of hospitalized patients with oncological diseases (hematological or solid tumor) evaluated by a palliative care service. We compared clinical, healthcare and survival variables between both groups. The analysis was performed using the SPSS v.15 package. Results: From January 2015 to December 2018, 1025 cancer patients were evaluated (10.8 % hematological tumor, 89.2 % solid tumors). No differences were found in functional status as measured by the Palliative Performance Scale, presentation of main symptom, percentage of patients with pain, time of follow-up, or percentage of deaths on admission to the evaluation. The hematological patient, compared to the oncological one, has less prescribed opioid treatment (43 % vs 53 %, p = 0.035), received greater hospital palliative care rather than home-based care (46.55 % vs 29.44 % the former and 15.5 % vs 33.06 % the latter, p = 0.001), and dies more frequently in a hospital (82.9 % vs. 65.5 %, p = 0.024). Conclusions: Patients with hematological malignancies present a symptomatic burden similar to that of those with solid tumors. It is important to better identify their needs so that they can benefit, as has been demonstrated with cancer patients, from integrated care together with hematology services using intervention models according to their needs and specific disease trajectories. (AU)

Los deseos de información en pacientes con cáncer avanzado / The desire for information in patients with advanced cancer

Objetivo: Comprobar los deseos de información, y las variables asociadas a ello, en los pacientes con cáncer avanzado atendidos por un Equipo de Soporte Hospitalario de Cuidados Paliativos. Método: Noventa pacientes con cáncer avanzado, fueron evaluados, mediante una entrevista estructurada sobre si tenían información sobre su enfermedad de los siguientes tipos: diagnóstico, curación, gravedad, objetivos del tratamiento y final de vida, y de su deseo de tener información en cada uno de esto cinco tipos de información. Además, se recogieron los datos sociodemográficos y clínicos, y se administraron: la Escala de Capacidad Funcional, el Índice de Comorbilidad de Charlson, y la Escala de Ansiedad y Depresión Hospitalaria. Resultados. Los resultados muestraron que la mayoría de los pacientes estaban informados del diagnóstico, y de la gravedad, pero no de los objetivos de tratamiento, la curación y el final de vida. De los pacientes no informados el 77,8% (14) deseaban conocer el diagnostico, el 60,0% (11) la gravedad, el 77,8% (35) el objetivo del tratamiento, el 76,7% (24) la curación y un 34,4% (10) el final de vida. Las variables asociadas al deseo de: a) información diagnóstica fueron: tener un cuidador principal más joven (p=,023); con pareja (p=,018), no religiosos (p=,025) y mayor número de visitas a urgencias (p=,004); b) información sobre gravedad fueron: ser joven (p=,009); con pareja (p=,04), y mejor estado ánimo (p=,009); c). Información sobre objetivos del tratamiento: ser joven (p=,001), Con pareja (p=,04), mejor estado ánimo (p=,001). d) información sobre curación: ser hombre (p=,018), con pareja (p=,04), no religiosos (p=,023). En el caso de información sobre el tiempo de vida no se encontró ninguna diferencia significativa

Objective: to study the desire for information in patients with avanzado cancer, and the variables associated with it. Method: Ninety patients with avanzado cancer were evaluated through a structured interview about the information of their disease of the following types: Diagnosis, cure, severity, goal of treatment and time for the end of life, and their desire to have information about each of these five types of information. In addition, sociodemographic and clinical data were collected and administered: the Functional Capacity Scale, the Charlson Comorbidity Index and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Results. The results showed that most patients are informed about the diagnosis and its severity, but scarcely about the goals of treatment, cure and end-of-life. Of the uninformed patients, 77.8% (14) wanted to know the diagnosis, 60.0% (11) the severity, 77.8% (35) the treatment goal, 76.7% (24 ) healing and 34.4% (10) end-of-life. The variables associated with the desire for: a) diagnostic information were: having a younger primary caregiver (p=.023); with a partner (p=.018), non-religious (p=.025) and a greater number of visits to the emergency room (p=.004); b) severity information were: being young (p=.009); with a partner (p=.04), and low depression (p=.009); C). Information about the goals of treatment: being young (p=.001), being in a relationship (p=.04), and low depression (p=.001). d) information about healing: being a man (p=.018), with a partner (p=.04), not religious (p=.023). In the case of lifetime information, no significant difference was found. Conclusions: it is necessary to evaluate the information and desires that patients have about the different types of information, so the creation of a standardized tool in future research is a priority

The Spanish version of the Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale-Short Form: reliability and validity assessment.

BACKGROUND: Only a minority of infants are exclusively breastfed for the recommended 6 months postpartum. Breastfeeding self-efficacy is a mother's confidence in her ability to breastfeed and is highly predictive of breastfeeding behaviors. The Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale-Short Form (BSES-SF) was developed among English-speaking mothers to measure breastfeeding self-efficacy. OBJECTIVES: To translate the BSES-SF into Spanish and assess its psychometric properties. DESIGN: Methodological study. SETTING: One public hospital in Orihuela, Spain. PARTICIPANTS: A convenience sample of 135 in-hospital breastfeeding women was recruited on their second day postpartum. METHODS: The BSES-SF was translated into Spanish using forward translation, back-translation and pilot testing. Internal consistency, construct validity and predictive validity were assessed. A battery of self-report questionnaires was administered on the second day postpartum including: a questionnaire on sociodemographic variables and breastfeeding status, the translated BSES-SF, the Spanish adaptation of the General Self-Efficacy Scale and the Stress Management Self-Efficacy Scale. Also, data on breastfeeding status at three weeks postpartum were collected by telephone interviews. RESULTS: The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for internal consistency was 0.92. The translated BSES-SF presented a unidimensional structure with factor loadings of >0.30. In addition, demographic response patterns and correlations with self-efficacy scales provided further evidence of construct validity. In-hospital BSES-SF scores significantly predicted exclusive breastfeeding at 3 weeks postpartum. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that the Spanish translation of the BSES-SF can be considered a valid and reliable measure of maternal breastfeeding self-efficacy in Spain.