Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Comput Biol Med ; 56: 13-9, 2015 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25464344

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This paper describes use of Prony's method as a filter applied to multifocal visual-evoked-potential (mfVEP) signals. Prony's method can be viewed as an extension of Fourier analysis that allows a signal to be decomposed into a linear combination of functions with different amplitudes, damping factors, frequencies and phase angles. METHOD: By selecting Prony method parameters, a frequency filter has been developed which improves signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Three different criteria were applied to data recorded from control subjects to produce three separate datasets: unfiltered raw data, data filtered using the traditional method (fast Fourier transform: FFT), and data filtered using Prony's method. RESULTS: Filtering using Prony's method improved the signals' original SNR by 44.52%, while the FFT filter improved the SNR by 33.56%. The extent to which signal can be separated from noise was analysed using receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curves. The area under the curve (AUC) was greater in the signals filtered using Prony's method than in the original signals or in those filtered using the FFT. CONCLUSION: filtering using Prony's method improves the quality of mfVEP signal pre-processing when compared with the original signals, or with those filtered using the FFT.


Assuntos
Eletroencefalografia/métodos , Potenciais Evocados Visuais/fisiologia , Processamento de Sinais Assistido por Computador , Adulto , Eletroencefalografia/instrumentação , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino
2.
Stud Health Technol Inform ; 207: 321-9, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25488238

RESUMO

The multifocal visual-evoked-potential (mfVEP) signals are filtered using the Wiener filter combined with a Fast Fourier Transform and their signal-to-noise ratios are compared against those of unfiltered signals (RAW data) and those of signals filtered using the traditional method (FFT data). The Wiener filter improves the original signals' SNR by 37.49%, while the FFT improves the SNR by 20.41%. This gain is achieved by selecting the best channel in each sector of the visual field. In conclusion, filtering using the Wieners method improves the quality of mfVEP signal pre-processing when compared against the original signals, or against filtering using the FFT.


Assuntos
Técnicas de Diagnóstico Oftalmológico , Potenciais Evocados Visuais/fisiologia , Glaucoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Processamento de Sinais Assistido por Computador , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...