Adequate restitution in primary hypothyroidism depending on levothyroxine formulations / Restitución adecuada en hipotiroidismo primario según las presentaciones de levotirotiroxina

Background: The prevalence of primary hypothyroidism (PH) is around 3.8%-4.6% in general population. Out of patients under treatment with levothyroxine, approximately 40% show altered levels of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH). Objective: To determine the prevalence of euthyroid sick syndrome in patients under treatment for PH in two local clinics, considering that the number of formulations of levothyroxine could be a contributing factor to the inadequate restitution. Methods: Descriptive, comparative cohort conducted with PH patients who were treated with a stable dose of levothyroxine for at least six months. Patients treated with mixtures of liothyronine/levothyroxine, with postsurgical hypothyroidism, pregnant, breastfeeding or mentally ill were discarded. Medical clinic 1 was a public center that had only access to levothyroxine of 100 µg, and medical clinic 2 was a private clinic with access to 25, 50, 75 and 100 µg levothyroxine formulations. Results: A total of 350 patients were evaluated. 190 patients were obtained at clinic 1, and 160 patients at clinic 2. At clinic 1, only 63% received the appropriate dose, while at clinic 2, 75% were medicated with the correct dose (p = 0.033). Conclusion: In the public center, 39% of patients did not receive appropriate dose of levothyroxine; however, in the private clinic, which had more drug formulations, the percentage of patients lowered to 25%. Therefore, the number of formulations could be a factor for the risk of inadequate restitution.

Introducción: La prevalencia de hipotiroidismo primario (HP) en la población general oscila entre 3.8 y 4.6%. De los pacientes que están bajo tratamiento con levotiroxina, aproximadamente 40% muestra una hormona estimulante de la tiroides (TSH) anormal. Objetivo: Conocer la prevalencia de eutiroidismo en pacientes tratados por HP en dos clínicas de nuestra localidad, considerando que las presentaciones de levotiroxina pudiesen ser un factor contribuyente. Métodos: Cohorte comparativa de pacientes con HP tratados con levotiroxina en dosis estable por más de seis meses. Se descartaron los pacientes tratados con mezclas de liotironina/levotiroxina, hipotiroidismo postquirúrgico, embarazadas o en lactancia e individuos con enfermedades mentales. La clínica 1 (entidad pública) contó con levotiroxina de 100 µg y la clínica 2 (entidad privada) con pastillas de 25, 50, 75 y 100 µg. Resultados: Evaluamos 350 pacientes. De la clínica 1 se obtuvieron 190 y de la clínica 2 fueron 160. En la clínica 1, el 63% recibió la dosis adecuada, mientras que en la clínica 2, el 75% eran medicados con la dosis correcta (p = 0.033). Conclusiones: En la entidad pública, 39% no recibió la dosis adecuada de levotiroxina; sin embargo, en la entidad privada, con más presentaciones del medicamento, el número disminuye a 25%. Por lo tanto el número de presentaciones podría ser un factor influyente para lograr el eutiroidismo.

Neutral protamine hagedorn/regular insulin in the treatment of inpatient hyperglycemia: Comparison of 3 basal-bolus regimens.

AIM: To compare the safety and efficacy or 3 basal-bolus regimens of neutral protamine hagedorn (NPH)/regular insulin in the management of inpatient hyperglycemia. METHODS: We randomized 105 patients with blood glucose levels between 140 and 400 mg/dL to a basal-bolus regimen of NPH insulin given once (n = 30), twice (n = 40) or three times (n = 35) daily, in addition to pre-meal regular insulin. Major outcomes included were differences in glycemic control, frequency of hypoglycemia and total insulin dose. RESULTS: NPH insulin given in a once-daily regimen was associated with better glycemic control (58.3%) compared to twice daily (42.4%) and three times daily (48.9) regimens (P = 0.031). The frequency of hypoglycemia was similar between the three groups (2.0%, 0.7% and 1.2%, P = 0.21). The mean insulin dose at discharge was 0.48 ± 0.14 U/kg in the once-daily group compared to 0.69 ± 0.28 in the twice-daily, and 0.65 ± 0.20 in the three times daily regimens (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: NPH insulin administered in a once-daily regimen resulted in improvement in glycemic control with similar rates of hypoglycemia compared to a twice-daily and a three times-daily regimen. Further studies are needed to evaluate whether this regimen could be implemented in all hospitalized patients with hyperglycemia.